Suppr超能文献

对于急性冠状动脉综合征患者,我们是否应考虑非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术?

Should we consider off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with acute coronary syndrome?

作者信息

Moscarelli Marco, Harling Leanne, Ashrafian Hutan, Athanasiou Thanos

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Mar;16(3):350-5. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs476. Epub 2012 Nov 25.

Abstract

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting should be considered as an alternative to the conventional on-pump surgery (ONCAB) in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring emergency revascularization. Eighty-two papers were identified by a systematic search, of which nine were judged to best answer the clinical question. Of these, one was a randomized controlled trial and the remaining eight were retrospective observational studies. The author, journal, date, patient group, country of publication, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses were tabulated. In total, these nine studies included 3001 patients (n = 817 OPCAB, 2184 ONCAB) undergoing emergency revascularization in the setting of ACS. The timing between the onset of ACS and operative intervention ranged from 6 to 72 h. All cases were categorized as urgent/emergent according to the National confidential enquiry into patient outcome and death classification of intervention. Six studies included patients with preoperative cardiogenic shock; however the majority of patients were haemodynamically stable at the time of surgery. Three out of nine studies showed an improvement in 30-day mortality with OPCAB although the remaining six reveal no significant mortality benefit. No difference in long-term mortality was observed between the two techniques. OPCAB was associated with significantly fewer grafts per patient (six studies) and less complete revascularization (two studies). We conclude that whilst OPCAB may have a beneficial effect on 30-day mortality in haemodynamically stable patients undergoing emergency revascularization, there is a lack of high-quality data with clearly defined patient demographics. Future studies must ensure adequate preoperative matching between OPCAB and ONCAB groups and clearly categorize haemodynamic status, disease pattern and time to surgery in order to determine the patients in whom OPCAB may confer the greatest benefit.

摘要

根据结构化方案撰写了一篇心脏外科的最佳证据主题。所探讨的问题是,对于患有急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)且需要紧急血运重建的患者,非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCAB)是否应被视为传统体外循环手术(ONCAB)的替代方案。通过系统检索确定了82篇论文,其中9篇被判定为能最佳回答该临床问题。其中,1篇为随机对照试验,其余8篇为回顾性观察研究。将作者、期刊、日期、患者组、发表国家、相关结局、结果及研究不足制成表格。这9项研究总共纳入了3001例在ACS情况下接受紧急血运重建的患者(n = 817例OPCAB,2184例ONCAB)。ACS发作至手术干预的时间间隔为6至72小时。根据国家患者结局保密调查和干预死亡分类,所有病例均被归类为紧急/急诊。6项研究纳入了术前心源性休克患者;然而,大多数患者在手术时血流动力学稳定。9项研究中有3项显示OPCAB可改善30天死亡率,尽管其余6项研究未显示出显著的死亡率获益。两种技术在长期死亡率方面未观察到差异。OPCAB与每位患者的移植血管显著减少(6项研究)和血运重建不完全(2项研究)相关。我们得出结论,虽然OPCAB可能对接受紧急血运重建的血流动力学稳定患者的30天死亡率有有益影响,但缺乏高质量数据且患者人口统计学定义不明确。未来的研究必须确保OPCAB组和ONCAB组术前充分匹配,并明确划分血流动力学状态、疾病模式和手术时间,以确定OPCAB可能带来最大益处的患者。

相似文献

1
Should we consider off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Mar;16(3):350-5. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs476. Epub 2012 Nov 25.
2
Should we consider off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients undergoing coronary endarterectomy?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Aug;19(2):295-301. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu116. Epub 2014 May 2.
3
The effect of off-pump coronary artery bypass on mortality after acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis.
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Nov 20;169(5):339-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
4
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery have a beneficial effect on mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Jun;14(6):856-64. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs067. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
5
Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Focus on Safety and Completeness of Revascularization.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Dec;68(8):679-686. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1677834. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
6
Impact of off-pump to on-pump conversion rate on post-operative results in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Feb;14(2):188-93. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivr071. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
9
Off-pump or on-pump beating heart: which technique offers better outcomes following coronary revascularization?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Apr;20(4):546-9. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu451. Epub 2015 Jan 11.
10
Off-pump versus on-pump revascularization in females: a meta-analysis of observational studies.
Perfusion. 2014 Sep;29(5):385-96. doi: 10.1177/0267659114525985. Epub 2014 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The current status of multi-arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
Surg Today. 2016 Jan;46(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1124-4. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
2
Off-pump coronary surgery: current justifications.
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;62(11):660-70. doi: 10.1007/s11748-014-0470-2. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

本文引用的文献

4
Off-pump coronary artery bypass for emergency myocardial revascularization.
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2009 Apr;17(2):133-8. doi: 10.1177/0218492309103288.
5
Off-pump versus on-pump myocardial revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized trial.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Mar;137(3):650-6; discussion 656-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.11.033.
7
Towards evidence-based medicine in cardiothoracic surgery: best BETS.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2003 Dec;2(4):405-9. doi: 10.1016/S1569-9293(03)00191-9.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验