Johnson B D, Seow K C, Pegelow D F, Dempsey J A
Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison 53705.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1990 Feb;68(2):802-9. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1990.68.2.802.
We automated the inert gas rebreathe technique for measurement of end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) during heavy exercise. We also assessed the use of two gas tracers (He and N2) vs. a single gas tracer (He) for measurement of this lung volume and compared the two-tracer EELV to changes in the inspiratory capacity (defined with transpulmonary pressure) and shifts in the end-expiratory pressure from rest through heavy exercise. A computer program switched a pneumatic valve when flow crossed zero at end expiration and defined points in the He and N2 traces for calculation of EELV. An inherent delay of the rebreathing valve (50 ms) caused virtually no error at rest and during light exercise and an error of 74 +/- 9 ml in the EELV at peak inspiratory flow rates of 4 l/s. The measurement of EELV by the two gas tracers was closely correlated to the single-gas tracer measurement (r = 0.97) but was consistently higher (120 +/- 10 ml) than when He was used alone. This difference was accentuated with increased work rates (2-5% error in the EELV, rest to heavy exercise) and as rebreathe time increased (2-7% error in the EELV with rebreathe times of 5-20 s for all work loads combined). The double-gas tracer measurement of EELV agreed quite well with the thoracic gas volume at rest (P greater than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
我们将惰性气体再呼吸技术自动化,用于在剧烈运动期间测量呼气末肺容积(EELV)。我们还评估了使用两种气体示踪剂(氦气和氮气)与单一气体示踪剂(氦气)测量该肺容积的情况,并将双示踪剂EELV与吸气容量(用跨肺压定义)的变化以及从静息到剧烈运动期间呼气末压力的变化进行了比较。一个计算机程序在呼气末流量越过零时切换气动阀,并在氦气和氮气曲线上定义点以计算EELV。再呼吸阀的固有延迟(50毫秒)在静息和轻度运动时几乎不会导致误差,而在吸气峰值流速为4升/秒时,EELV的误差为74±9毫升。两种气体示踪剂测量的EELV与单一气体示踪剂测量密切相关(r = 0.97),但始终比单独使用氦气时高(120±10毫升)。随着工作强度增加(EELV误差为2 - 5%,从静息到剧烈运动)以及再呼吸时间增加(所有工作负荷下再呼吸时间为5 - 20秒时,EELV误差为2 - 7%),这种差异更加明显。双气体示踪剂测量的EELV与静息时的胸腔气体容积相当吻合(P>0.05)。(摘要截短为250字)