Im Hee Yeon, Halberda Justin
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Feb;75(2):278-86. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0399-4.
Increasing numbers of studies have explored human observers' ability to rapidly extract statistical descriptions from collections of similar items (e.g., the average size and orientation of a group of tilted Gabor patches). Determining whether these descriptions are generated by mechanisms that are independent from object-based sampling procedures requires that we investigate how internal noise, external noise, and sampling affect subjects' performance. Here we systematically manipulated the external variability of ensembles and used variance summation modeling to estimate both the internal noise and the number of samples that affected the representation of ensemble average size. The results suggest that humans sample many more than one or two items from an array when forming an estimate of the average size, and that the internal noise that affects ensemble processing is lower than the noise that affects the processing of single objects. These results are discussed in light of other recent modeling efforts and suggest that ensemble processing of average size relies on a mechanism that is distinct from segmenting individual items. This ensemble process may be more similar to texture processing.
越来越多的研究探讨了人类观察者从相似项目集合中快速提取统计描述的能力(例如,一组倾斜的伽柏补丁的平均大小和方向)。要确定这些描述是否由独立于基于对象的采样程序的机制生成,就需要我们研究内部噪声、外部噪声和采样如何影响受试者的表现。在这里,我们系统地操纵了集合的外部变异性,并使用方差求和模型来估计影响集合平均大小表示的内部噪声和样本数量。结果表明,人类在形成平均大小估计时,从数组中采样的项目远远超过一两个,并且影响集合处理的内部噪声低于影响单个对象处理的噪声。结合最近的其他建模工作对这些结果进行了讨论,结果表明平均大小的集合处理依赖于一种不同于分割单个项目的机制。这种集合过程可能与纹理处理更为相似。