• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

类别推理作为关联结构、类别可辨别性和可用线索数量的函数。

Category inference as a function of correlational structure, category discriminability, and number of available cues.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2013 Apr;41(3):339-53. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0271-8.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-012-0271-8
PMID:23192309
Abstract

Two experiments investigated category inference when categories were composed of correlated or uncorrelated dimensions and the categories overlapped minimally or moderately. When the categories minimally overlapped, the dimensions were strongly correlated with the category label. Following a classification learning phase, subsequent transfer required the selection of either a category label or a feature when one, two, or three features were missing. Experiments 1 and 2 differed primarily in the number of learning blocks prior to transfer. In each experiment, the inference of the category label or category feature was influenced by both dimensional and category correlations, as well as their interaction. The number of cues available at test impacted performance more when the dimensional correlations were zero and category overlap was high. However, a minimal number of cues were sufficient to produce high levels of inference when the dimensions were highly correlated; additional cues had a positive but reduced impact, even when overlap was high. Subjects were generally more accurate in inferring the category label than a category feature regardless of dimensional correlation, category overlap, or number of cues available at test. Whether the category label functioned as a special feature or not was critically dependent upon these embedded correlations, with feature inference driven more strongly by dimensional correlations.

摘要

两个实验研究了当类别由相关或不相关的维度组成,且类别最小或中度重叠时的类别推理。当类别最小重叠时,维度与类别标签强烈相关。在分类学习阶段之后,在一个、两个或三个特征缺失的情况下,后续的转移需要选择类别标签或特征。实验 1 和 2 主要在转移前的学习块数量上有所不同。在每个实验中,类别标签或类别特征的推断都受到维度和类别相关性以及它们的相互作用的影响。当维度相关性为零时且类别重叠较高时,测试时可用线索的数量对性能的影响更大。然而,当维度高度相关时,只需少量线索就足以产生高水平的推断;即使重叠很高,额外的线索也有积极但降低的影响。无论维度相关性、类别重叠或测试时可用线索的数量如何,受试者在推断类别标签时通常比推断类别特征更准确。类别标签是否作为特殊特征起作用取决于这些嵌入的相关性,特征推断更多地受维度相关性的驱动。

相似文献

1
Category inference as a function of correlational structure, category discriminability, and number of available cues.类别推理作为关联结构、类别可辨别性和可用线索数量的函数。
Mem Cognit. 2013 Apr;41(3):339-53. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0271-8.
2
Feature-to-Feature Inference Under Conditions of Cue Restriction and Dimensional Correlation.
Am J Psychol. 2017;130(1):35-45. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.130.1.0035.
3
Learning about the internal structure of categories through classification and feature inference.通过分类和特征推理了解类别的内部结构。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(9):1786-807. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.871567. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
4
More than one kind of inference: re-examining what's learned in feature inference and classification.不止一种推理方式:重新审视在特征推理和分类中学到的内容。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Aug;63(8):1568-89. doi: 10.1080/17470210903438547. Epub 2010 Apr 6.
5
Category dimensionality and feature knowledge: when more features are learned as easily as fewer.类别维度与特征知识:何时学习更多特征与学习更少特征一样容易。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Mar;32(2):301-315. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.301.
6
Classification versus inference learning contrasted with real-world categories.分类学习与推理学习对比与真实世界的类别。
Mem Cognit. 2011 Jul;39(5):764-77. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0058-8.
7
Why interleaving enhances inductive learning: the roles of discrimination and retrieval.为什么交错增强了归纳学习:辨别和检索的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2013 Apr;41(3):392-402. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0272-7.
8
Relational discovery in category learning.范畴学习中的关系发现。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Jan;147(1):1-35. doi: 10.1037/xge0000387.
9
Prior knowledge enhances the category dimensionality effect.先验知识增强了类别维度效应。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Mar;36(2):256-70. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.2.256.
10
The indirect modification of categorical knowledge.分类知识的间接修改。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Feb;22(1):219-27. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0662-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological Science Can Improve Diagnostic Decisions.心理科学可以改善诊断决策。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2000 May;1(1):1-26. doi: 10.1111/1529-1006.001. Epub 2000 May 1.
2
Induction and category coherence.诱导与范畴连贯性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Mar;3(1):95-9. doi: 10.3758/BF03210747.
3
Carrot eaters or moving heads: inductive inference is better supported by salient features than by category labels.吃胡萝卜的人还是摇头的人:显著特征比类别标签更能支持归纳推理。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Feb;23(2):178-86. doi: 10.1177/0956797611429133. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
4
Classification versus inference learning contrasted with real-world categories.分类学习与推理学习对比与真实世界的类别。
Mem Cognit. 2011 Jul;39(5):764-77. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0058-8.
5
Learning and retention through predictive inference and classification.通过预测推理和分类进行学习和保持。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2010 Dec;16(4):361-77. doi: 10.1037/a0021610.
6
Category vs. Object Knowledge in Category-based Induction.基于类别的归纳中类别知识与客体知识的比较
J Mem Lang. 2010 Jul 1;63(1):1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.12.002.
7
Five-year-olds' beliefs about the discreteness of category boundaries for animals and artifacts.五岁儿童对动物和人工制品类别边界离散性的信念。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Oct;16(5):920-4. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.920.
8
Classification as diagnostic reasoning.作为诊断推理的分类。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Sep;37(6):715-29. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.6.715.
9
Better learning with more error: probabilistic feedback increases sensitivity to correlated cues in categorization.通过更多错误实现更好的学习:概率反馈提高了对分类中相关线索的敏感性。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jul;35(4):1041-61. doi: 10.1037/a0015902.
10
Early word-learning entails reference, not merely associations.早期的词汇学习需要指代,而不仅仅是联想。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Jun;13(6):258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.03.006. Epub 2009 May 15.