Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Polinski, Dr Smith, Dr Seeger, Dr Choudhry, Dr Connolly, Dr Shrank)
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Polinski, Dr Seeger, Dr Choudhry, Dr Shrank)
Diabetes Educ. 2013 Jan-Feb;39(1):53-65. doi: 10.1177/0145721712467696. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
Treatment guidelines recommend insulin progression (switching from basal to a premixed insulin regimen, adding bolus doses, and/or increasing dosing frequency) to achieve A1C targets as type 2 diabetes progresses, but fewer patients are being progressed than would be indicated based on their disease status. This systematic review proposes 2 questions regarding insulin progression among patients with type 2 diabetes: (1) What are the patient, provider, and health system barriers to insulin progression? (2) Do insulin progression barriers differ between insulin-naive and insulin-experienced patients?
We conducted a systematic review in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases through July 2011.
Of 745 potentially relevant articles, 10 met inclusion criteria: 7 evaluated patient and 2 evaluated provider barriers, and 1 was an intervention to reduce barriers among physicians. Patients with prior insulin experience had fewer barriers arising from injection-related concerns and worries about the burden of insulin progression than did insulin-naive patients. Physician barriers included concerns about patients' ability to follow more complicated regimens as well as physicians' own inexperience with insulin and progression algorithms. The cross-sectional nature, narrow scope, and failure of all studies to examine patient, provider, and health systems barriers concurrently limited both barrier identification and an assessment of their impact on progression.
Patient and physician experience with insulin and diabetes/insulin education were associated with fewer perceived barriers to insulin progression. Future studies should use multilevel longitudinal designs to quantify the relative impact of potential patient, provider, and health system factors on progression and health outcomes.
治疗指南建议随着 2 型糖尿病的进展,通过胰岛素的逐步升级(从基础胰岛素转为预混胰岛素方案、添加餐时胰岛素剂量、和/或增加给药频率)来实现 A1C 目标,但实际上进展治疗的患者比根据疾病状况所应进展的患者要少。本系统综述针对 2 型糖尿病患者的胰岛素逐步升级提出了 2 个问题:(1)患者、医生和医疗体系在胰岛素逐步升级方面存在哪些障碍?(2)胰岛素逐步升级障碍在胰岛素初治和胰岛素经治患者之间是否存在差异?
我们对 MEDLINE、EMBASE、科学引文索引、PsycINFO、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库进行了系统综述,检索时间截至 2011 年 7 月。
在 745 篇可能相关的文章中,有 10 篇符合纳入标准:7 篇评估了患者和 2 篇评估了医生的障碍,1 篇为减少医生障碍的干预研究。与胰岛素初治患者相比,有胰岛素治疗经验的患者在注射相关顾虑和对胰岛素升级负担的担忧方面的障碍较少。医生的障碍包括担心患者难以遵循更复杂的治疗方案,以及医生自身对胰岛素和升级算法缺乏经验。所有研究都局限于横断面研究、研究范围狭窄,且未能同时考察患者、医生和医疗体系障碍,这限制了对障碍的识别和对其对升级影响的评估。
患者和医生对胰岛素和糖尿病/胰岛素教育的经验与对胰岛素逐步升级的认知障碍较少有关。未来的研究应采用多层次纵向设计,量化潜在的患者、医生和医疗体系因素对升级和健康结果的相对影响。