• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测 2 型糖尿病患者对胰岛素冲击治疗的反应。

Predicting Response to Bolus Insulin Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

机构信息

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Optum Labs, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Nov;17(6):1573-1579. doi: 10.1177/19322968221098057. Epub 2022 May 20.

DOI:10.1177/19322968221098057
PMID:35596567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10658685/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model to classify people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) into expected levels of success upon bolus insulin initiation.

METHODS

Machine learning methods were applied to a large nationally representative insurance claims database from the United States (dNHI database; data from 2007 to 2017). We trained boosted decision tree ensembles (XGBoost) to assign people into Class 0 (never meeting HbA1c goal), Class 1 (meeting but not maintaining HbA1c goal), or Class 2 (meeting and maintaining HbA1c goal) based on the demographic and clinical data available prior to initiating bolus insulin. The primary objective of the study was to develop a model capable of determining at an individual level, whether people with T2D are likely to achieve and maintain HbA1c goals. HbA1c goal was defined at <8.0% or reduction of baseline HbA1c by >1.0%.

RESULTS

Of 15 331 people with T2D (mean age, 53.0 years; SD, 8.7), 7800 (50.9%) people met HbA1c goal but failed to maintain that goal (Class 1), 4510 (29.4%) never attained this goal (Class 0), and 3021 (19.7%) people met and maintained this goal (Class 2). Overall, the model's receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was 0.79 with greater performance on predicting those in Class 2 (ROC = 0.92) than those in Classes 0 and 1 (ROC = 0.71 and 0.62, respectively). The model achieved high area under the precision-recall curves for the individual classes (Class 0, 0.46; Class 1, 0.58; Class 2, 0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

Predictive modeling using routine health care data reasonably accurately classified patients initiating bolus insulin who would achieve and maintain HbA1c goals, but less so for differentiation between patients who never met and who did not maintain goals. Prior HbA1c was a major contributing parameter for the predictions.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在开发一种预测模型,以将 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者分为起始胰岛素冲击治疗后预期达标水平。

方法

应用机器学习方法对来自美国的大型全国性保险理赔数据库(dNHI 数据库;数据来自 2007 年至 2017 年)进行分析。我们利用提升决策树集合(XGBoost)对人群进行分类,0 类(从未达到 HbA1c 目标)、1 类(达到但未维持 HbA1c 目标)或 2 类(达到并维持 HbA1c 目标),分类依据是起始胰岛素冲击治疗前的人口统计学和临床数据。研究的主要目的是开发一种能够确定个体患者是否可能达到和维持 HbA1c 目标的模型。HbA1c 目标定义为<8.0%或较基线 HbA1c 降低>1.0%。

结果

在 15331 例 T2D 患者中(平均年龄 53.0 岁,标准差 8.7),7800 例(50.9%)患者达到 HbA1c 目标但未能维持(1 类),4510 例(29.4%)从未达到此目标(0 类),3021 例(19.7%)患者达到并维持此目标(2 类)。总体而言,模型的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)为 0.79,对预测 2 类患者(ROC=0.92)的性能优于预测 0 类和 1 类患者(ROC=0.71 和 0.62)。模型在预测个体患者类别时,精准度-召回曲线下面积较高(0 类,0.46;1 类,0.58;2 类,0.71)。

结论

利用常规医疗保健数据进行预测建模可以合理准确地对起始胰岛素冲击治疗的患者进行分类,以评估其是否能达到和维持 HbA1c 目标,但对区分从未达标和未能维持目标的患者的预测效果较差。既往 HbA1c 是预测的主要影响因素。

相似文献

1
Predicting Response to Bolus Insulin Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.预测 2 型糖尿病患者对胰岛素冲击治疗的反应。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Nov;17(6):1573-1579. doi: 10.1177/19322968221098057. Epub 2022 May 20.
2
Predicting short- and long-term glycated haemoglobin response after insulin initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using machine-learning algorithms.使用机器学习算法预测 2 型糖尿病患者起始胰岛素治疗后短期和长期糖化血红蛋白的反应。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Dec;21(12):2704-2711. doi: 10.1111/dom.13860. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
3
Is insulin the preferred treatment for HbA1c >9%?对于糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)>9%的患者,胰岛素是首选治疗药物吗?
J Diabetes. 2017 Sep;9(9):814-816. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12575. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
4
Beyond HbA1c.超越糖化血红蛋白。
J Diabetes. 2017 Dec;9(12):1052-1053. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12590. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
5
Randomized, open-label, parallel-group evaluations of basal-bolus therapy versus insulin lispro premixed therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus failing to achieve control with starter insulin treatment and continuing oral antihyperglycemic drugs: a noninferiority intensification substudy of the DURABLE trial.随机、开放标签、平行组评估:对于起始胰岛素治疗控制不佳且继续使用口服降糖药的 2 型糖尿病患者,基础-餐时胰岛素治疗与赖脯胰岛素预混治疗的疗效比较:DURABLE 试验的一项非劣效性强化亚研究。
Clin Ther. 2010 May;32(5):896-908. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.05.001.
6
Clinical and economic outcomes among injection-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes initiating dulaglutide compared with basal insulin in a US real-world setting: the DISPEL Study.在真实世界环境中,与基础胰岛素相比,初治 2 型糖尿病患者接受度拉鲁肽治疗的临床和经济结局:DISPEL 研究。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019 Dec 9;7(1):e000884. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000884. eCollection 2019.
7
Glycemic control with diet, sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: progressive requirement for multiple therapies (UKPDS 49). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.2型糖尿病患者通过饮食、磺脲类药物、二甲双胍或胰岛素进行血糖控制:对多种治疗方法的渐进性需求(英国前瞻性糖尿病研究49)。英国前瞻性糖尿病研究(UKPDS)小组
JAMA. 1999 Jun 2;281(21):2005-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.21.2005.
8
Risk Factors for Nocturnal Hypoglycemia in Insulin-treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of Observational Data Derived From an Integrated Clinical Trial Database.2型糖尿病胰岛素治疗患者夜间低血糖的危险因素:来自综合临床试验数据库的观察性数据的二次分析
Clin Ther. 2017 Sep;39(9):1790-1798.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.07.037. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
9
Predictors of responders to insulin therapy at 1 year among adults with type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病成人患者中胰岛素治疗 1 年后应答者的预测因素。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2010 Oct;12(10):865-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01239.x.
10
Individualized HbA Goals, and Patient Awareness and Attainment of Goals in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Real-World Multinational Survey.个体化 HbA1c 目标与 2 型糖尿病患者的知晓和达标情况:一项真实世界的跨国调查。
Adv Ther. 2022 Feb;39(2):1016-1032. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01985-3. Epub 2021 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of People With Type 2 Diabetes Not Achieving HbA1c Target After Initiation of Fast-Acting Insulin Therapy: Using Machine Learning Framework on Clinical Trial Data.速效胰岛素治疗开始后未达到糖化血红蛋白目标的2型糖尿病患者的预测:基于临床试验数据的机器学习框架应用
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Sep 20:19322968241280096. doi: 10.1177/19322968241280096.
2
Review: Machine learning in precision pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes-A promising future or a glimpse of hope?综述:机器学习在2型糖尿病精准药物治疗中的应用——前景光明还是仅一线希望?
Digit Health. 2023 Sep 29;9:20552076231203879. doi: 10.1177/20552076231203879. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: .9. 血糖治疗的药物学方法: 。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S111-S124. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S009.
2
The burden of type 2 diabetes in Europe: Current and future aspects of insulin treatment from patient and healthcare spending perspectives.欧洲 2 型糖尿病负担:从患者和医疗保健支出角度看胰岛素治疗的现状和未来。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 Mar;161:108053. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108053. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
3
Predicting short- and long-term glycated haemoglobin response after insulin initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using machine-learning algorithms.使用机器学习算法预测 2 型糖尿病患者起始胰岛素治疗后短期和长期糖化血红蛋白的反应。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Dec;21(12):2704-2711. doi: 10.1111/dom.13860. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
4
Patterns and trends in insulin initiation and intensification among patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Middle East and North Africa region.在中东和北非地区,2 型糖尿病患者胰岛素起始和强化的模式和趋势。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Mar;149:18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.01.017. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
5
Clinical and economic considerations based on persistency with a novel insulin delivery device versus conventional insulin delivery in patients with type 2 diabetes: A retrospective analysis.基于 2 型糖尿病患者使用新型胰岛素给药装置与传统胰岛素给药装置的持久性的临床和经济考虑:一项回顾性分析。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Sep;15(9):1126-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
6
Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).2018 年美国糖尿病协会(ADA)和欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)共识报告:2 型糖尿病患者高血糖管理。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Dec;41(12):2669-2701. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0033. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
7
Insulin Matters: A Practical Approach to Basal Insulin Management in Type 2 Diabetes.胰岛素至关重要:2型糖尿病基础胰岛素管理的实用方法
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Apr;9(2):501-519. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0375-7. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
8
Strategies for implementing effective mealtime insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病患者实施有效餐时胰岛素治疗的策略
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Jun;34(6):1153-1162. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1440200. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
9
Predictors of HbA1c over 4 years in people with type 2 diabetes starting insulin therapies: The CREDIT study.2型糖尿病患者开始胰岛素治疗后4年糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的预测因素:CREDIT研究
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015 Jun;108(3):432-40. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.02.034. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
10
Glycemic control after initiating basal insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a primary care database analysis.2型糖尿病患者起始基础胰岛素治疗后的血糖控制:一项初级保健数据库分析
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2015 Jan 14;8:45-8. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S76855. eCollection 2015.