Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Radiology. 2013 Feb;266(2):610-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120670. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
To retrospectively determine the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) in identifying the presence or absence of preoperative Wilms tumor rupture.
The cohort was derived from the AREN03B2 study of the Children's Oncology Group. The study was approved by the institutional review board and was compliant with HIPAA. Written informed consent was obtained before enrollment. The diagnosis of Wilms tumor rupture was established by central review of notes from surgery and/or pathologic examination. Seventy Wilms tumor cases with rupture were matched to 70 Wilms tumor controls without rupture according to age and tumor weight (within 6 months and 50 g, respectively). CT scans were independently reviewed by two radiologists, and the following CT findings were assessed: poorly circumscribed mass, perinephric fat stranding, peritumoral fat planes obscured, retroperitoneal fluid (subcapsular vs extracapsular), ascites beyond the cul-de-sac, peritoneal implants, ipsilateral pleural effusion, and intratumoral hemorrhage. All fluids were classified as hemorrhagic or nonhemorrhagic by using a cutoff of 30 HU. The relationship between CT findings and rupture was assessed with logistic regression models.
The sensitivity and specificity for detecting Wilms tumor rupture were 54% (36 of 67 cases) and 88% (61 of 69 cases), respectively, for reviewer 1 and 70% (47 of 67 cases) and 88% (61 of 69 cases), respectively, for reviewer 2. Interobserver agreement was substantial (ĸ = 0.76). All imaging signs tested, except peritoneal implants, intratumoral hemorrhage, and subcapsular fluid, showed a significant association with rupture (P ≤ .02). The attenuation of ascitic fluid did not have a significant correlation with rupture (P = .9990). Ascites beyond the cul-de-sac was the single best indicator of rupture for both reviewers, followed by perinephric fat stranding and retroperitoneal fluid for reviewers 1 and 2, respectively (P < .01).
CT has moderate specificity but relatively low sensitivity in the detection of preoperative Wilms tumor rupture. Ascites beyond the cul-de-sac, irrespective of attenuation, is most predictive of rupture.
回顾性分析计算机断层扫描(CT)在术前识别Wilms 肿瘤破裂方面的诊断性能。
该队列来自儿童肿瘤学组的 AREN03B2 研究。该研究得到了机构审查委员会的批准,并符合 HIPAA 规定。在入组前获得了书面知情同意。Wilms 肿瘤破裂的诊断是通过对手术和/或病理检查记录的中心审查确定的。根据年龄和肿瘤重量(分别为 6 个月和 50 克以内),将 70 例Wilms 肿瘤破裂病例与 70 例Wilms 肿瘤对照病例相匹配。CT 扫描由两名放射科医生独立进行回顾,评估以下 CT 表现:边界不清的肿块、肾周脂肪条索状、肿瘤周围脂肪平面模糊、腹膜后积液(包膜下与包膜外)、超出子宫直肠窝的腹水、腹膜种植、同侧胸腔积液和肿瘤内出血。所有液体均通过 30HU 的截断值进行分类为出血性或非出血性。使用逻辑回归模型评估 CT 表现与破裂之间的关系。
对于评估破裂的放射科医生 1 而言,检测Wilms 肿瘤破裂的敏感性和特异性分别为 54%(67 例中的 36 例)和 88%(69 例中的 61 例),对于放射科医生 2 而言,敏感性和特异性分别为 70%(67 例中的 47 例)和 88%(69 例中的 61 例)。两位观察者之间的一致性为中等(ĸ=0.76)。除腹膜种植、肿瘤内出血和包膜下积液外,所有测试的影像学征象均与破裂有显著关联(P≤0.02)。腹水的衰减与破裂无显著相关性(P=0.9990)。对于两位观察者而言,超出子宫直肠窝的腹水均是破裂的最佳指示物,其次是肾周脂肪条索状和腹膜后积液,分别是对于放射科医生 1 和 2(P<0.01)。
CT 对术前 Wilms 肿瘤破裂的检测具有中等特异性,但敏感性相对较低。超出子宫直肠窝的腹水,无论衰减如何,是最能预测破裂的。