Department of Engineering, College of Technology and Computer Science, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013 Apr;60(4):1126-33. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2012.2227477. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is an established clinical practice in managing patients with risk of acute ICP elevation although the clinically accepted way of measuring ICP remains invasive. However, the invasive nature of ICP measurement obviates its application in many clinical circumstances such as diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IH). We propose a noninvasive diagnostic tool for IH based on the morphological analysis of cerebral blood flow velocity waveforms. We mainly compare two types of IH detection methods: one based on the traditional supervised learning approach and the other based on the semisupervised learning approach. Our simulation results demonstrate that the predictive accuracy (area under the curve) of the semisupervised IH detection method can be as high as 92% while that of the supervised IH detection method is only around 82%. It should be noted that the predictive accuracy of the pulsatility index (PI)-based IH detection method is as low as 59%. Although the predictive accuracy is a widely used accuracy measurement, it does not consider clinical consequences of necessary and unnecessary treatments. For this reason, we have adopted the decision curve analysis to address this issue. The decision curve analysis results show that the semisupervised IH detection method is not only more accurate, but also clinically more useful than the supervised IH detection method or the PI-based IH detection method.
颅内压 (ICP) 监测是管理有急性 ICP 升高风险患者的一种既定临床实践,尽管测量 ICP 的临床公认方法仍然具有侵入性。然而,ICP 测量的侵入性性质排除了其在许多临床情况下的应用,例如特发性颅内高压 (IH) 的诊断。我们提出了一种基于脑血流速度波形形态分析的 IH 非侵入性诊断工具。我们主要比较了两种 IH 检测方法:一种基于传统的监督学习方法,另一种基于半监督学习方法。我们的模拟结果表明,半监督 IH 检测方法的预测准确性(曲线下面积)可高达 92%,而监督 IH 检测方法的预测准确性仅约为 82%。值得注意的是,基于脉动指数 (PI) 的 IH 检测方法的预测准确性低至 59%。尽管预测准确性是一种广泛使用的准确性衡量标准,但它并未考虑到必要和不必要治疗的临床后果。出于这个原因,我们采用了决策曲线分析来解决这个问题。决策曲线分析结果表明,半监督 IH 检测方法不仅更准确,而且在临床上比监督 IH 检测方法或基于 PI 的 IH 检测方法更有用。