Department of Neurosurgery, the David Geffen School of Medicine, Neural Systems and Dynamics Laboratory, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Physiol Meas. 2010 May;31(5):679-95. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/31/5/006. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
We investigated whether intracranial pressure (ICP) pulse morphological metrics could be used to realize continuous detection of low cerebral blood flow. Sixty-three acutely brain injured patients with ICP monitoring, daily (133)Xenon cerebral blood flow (CBF) and daily transcranial Doppler (TCD) assessments were studied. Their ICP recordings were time-aligned with the CBF and TCD measurements so that a 1 h ICP segment near the CBF and TCD measurements was obtained. Each of these recordings was processed by the Morphological Cluster and Analysis of Intracranial Pressure (MOCAIP) algorithm to extract pulse morphological metrics. Then the differential evolution algorithm was used to find the optimal combination of the metrics that provided, using the regularized linear discriminant analysis, the largest combined positive predictivity and sensitivity. At a CBF threshold of 20 ml/min/100 g, a sensitivity of 81.8 +/- 0.9% and a specificity of 50.1 +/- 0.2% were obtained using the optimal combination of conventional TCD and blood analysis metrics as input to a regularized linear classifier. However, using the optimal combination of the MOCAIP metrics alone we were able to achieve a sensitivity of 92.5 +/- 0.7% and a specificity of 84.8 +/- 0.8%. Searching the optimal combination of all available metrics, we achieved the best result that was marginally better than those from using MOCAIP alone. This study demonstrated that the potential role of ICP monitoring may be extended to provide an indicator of low global cerebral blood perfusion.
我们研究了颅内压(ICP)脉冲形态学指标是否可用于实现对低脑血流的连续检测。对 63 例接受 ICP 监测、每日(133)氙气脑血流(CBF)和每日经颅多普勒(TCD)评估的急性脑损伤患者进行了研究。他们的 ICP 记录与 CBF 和 TCD 测量时间对齐,以便获得靠近 CBF 和 TCD 测量的 1 小时 ICP 段。使用形态聚类和颅内压分析算法(MOCAIP)对这些记录中的每一个进行处理,以提取脉冲形态学指标。然后使用差分进化算法找到最佳的指标组合,使用正则化线性判别分析,提供最大的联合阳性预测值和敏感性。在 CBF 阈值为 20ml/min/100g 时,使用常规 TCD 和血液分析指标的最佳组合作为正则化线性分类器的输入,获得了 81.8%±0.9%的敏感性和 50.1%±0.2%的特异性。然而,仅使用 MOCAIP 指标的最佳组合,我们就能够达到 92.5%±0.7%的敏感性和 84.8%±0.8%的特异性。搜索所有可用指标的最佳组合,我们获得了略优于仅使用 MOCAIP 的最佳结果。这项研究表明,ICP 监测的潜在作用可能会扩展到提供低全脑灌注的指标。