Department of Urology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Urology. 2013 Jan;81(1):204-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.09.020. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
To compare the efficacy and safety of intracorpus spongiosum block (ICSB) over topical anesthesia for performing visual internal urethrotomy (VIU) in a randomized clinical trial.
VIU for urethral stricture can be performed under various types of anesthesia, including topical anesthesia. Although recent studies have shown that ICSB and general anesthesia have comparable efficacy for performing VIU, no studies have compared ICSB with topical anesthesia. Forty consenting patients with single, short, passable anterior urethral stricture were randomized into two groups. Group 1 patients received topical 2% lignocaine jelly and group 2 patients received 1% lignocaine ICSB for undergoing VIU. Pain perception during and after the procedure was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS). The changes in vital parameters during the procedure and procedure-related complications were recorded. Statistical analysis was done using the Mann-Whitney test or t test.
The mean±standard deviation VAS scores intraoperatively (2.85±1.34) and at 1-hour postoperatively (1.17±0.96) were significantly lower (P<01) in group 2 patients than the corresponding scores in group 1 (4.9±1.9 and 2.35±1.34 respectively). The intraoperative rise in pulse rate and in blood pressure were significantly greater (P<.05) in group 1 patients (13±5.1/min and 11.3±6.44 mm Hg) than in group 2 (8.05±5.54/min and 6.35±5.86 mm Hg).
ICSB is safe and more effective than topical anesthesia for providing pain relief during VIU. This should become the local anesthesia technique of choice for performing VIU.
在随机临床试验中比较海绵体腔内阻滞(ICSB)与局部麻醉在经尿道内切开术(VIU)中的疗效和安全性。
VIU 可在多种类型的麻醉下进行,包括局部麻醉。尽管最近的研究表明 ICSB 和全身麻醉在进行 VIU 方面具有相当的疗效,但没有研究比较过 ICSB 与局部麻醉。将 40 名同意进行单处、短段、可通过的前尿道狭窄 VIU 的患者随机分为两组。第 1 组患者接受 2%利多卡因凝胶局部麻醉,第 2 组患者接受 1%利多卡因 ICSB 进行 VIU。通过视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估术中及术后疼痛感知。记录术中生命参数变化及与操作相关的并发症。使用 Mann-Whitney 检验或 t 检验进行统计学分析。
第 2 组患者术中(2.85±1.34)和术后 1 小时(1.17±0.96)的平均±标准差 VAS 评分显著低于第 1 组(分别为 4.9±1.9 和 2.35±1.34)(P<01)。第 1 组患者术中脉搏率和血压升高显著(P<.05)(分别为 13±5.1/min 和 11.3±6.44mmHg),而第 2 组(分别为 8.05±5.54/min 和 6.35±5.86mmHg)则无显著变化。
与局部麻醉相比,ICSB 为 VIU 提供了更有效的镇痛,且安全。这应该成为进行 VIU 的局部麻醉技术选择。