Suppr超能文献

使用海绵体阻滞联合镇静进行光学尿道切开术的安全性和有效性:一项非随机对照研究

The safety and efficacy of optical urethrotomy using a spongiosum block with sedation: a comparative nonrandomized study.

作者信息

Ather M Hammad, Zehri Ali Akbar, Soomro Kashifuddin, Nazir Irfan

机构信息

Section of Urology, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

J Urol. 2009 May;181(5):2134-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.017. Epub 2009 Mar 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Optical urethrotomy is generally performed with the patient under general or major regional anesthesia. We determined the safety and efficacy of optical urethrotomy using a spongiosum block with sedation for anterior urethral stricture in a comparative, nonrandomized study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 32 patients with anterior urethral stricture optical urethrotomy was performed under general/major regional anesthesia in 16 patients (group 1) or a spongiosum block and sedation in 16 (group 2). In group 2 a total of 2 to 3 ml 1% lidocaine were slowly injected into the glans penis. Standard optical urethrotomy was performed immediately with a cold cut knife.

RESULTS

The 2 groups were matching in terms of patient age, and stricture cause and length. Optical urethrotomy was successfully completed in all patients in group 1 and in 15 of 16 in group 2. In group 2, 15 patients (94%) had no pain or discomfort. One patient reported moderate discomfort and the procedure was abandoned. In group 2 none of the patients required parental analgesia post procedure. The first year recurrence was not significantly different in the 2 groups (p = 0.192). The anesthetic effect lasted for about an hour and was satisfactory without any complications. Pain score on the visual analogue scale was not different in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Optical urethrotomy using a spongiosum block with sedation is as safe and effective as using regional or general anesthesia, particularly in patients who are more ill. The shorter operative time in the local anesthesia group could also make it cost-effective.

摘要

目的

光学尿道切开术通常在全身麻醉或主要区域麻醉下对患者进行。在一项比较性、非随机研究中,我们确定了使用海绵体阻滞加镇静用于前尿道狭窄的光学尿道切开术的安全性和有效性。

材料与方法

32例前尿道狭窄患者中,16例患者(第1组)在全身/主要区域麻醉下进行光学尿道切开术,16例(第2组)在海绵体阻滞加镇静下进行。在第2组中,将总共2至3毫升1%利多卡因缓慢注入阴茎头。立即用冷切刀进行标准的光学尿道切开术。

结果

两组在患者年龄、狭窄原因和长度方面相匹配。第1组所有患者和第2组16例中的15例成功完成了光学尿道切开术。在第2组中,15例患者(94%)无疼痛或不适。1例患者报告有中度不适,手术中止。第2组术后无患者需要静脉镇痛。两组第一年的复发率无显著差异(p = 0.192)。麻醉效果持续约1小时,效果满意,无任何并发症。两组视觉模拟量表的疼痛评分无差异。

结论

使用海绵体阻滞加镇静的光学尿道切开术与使用区域或全身麻醉一样安全有效,尤其是对于病情较重的患者。局部麻醉组较短的手术时间也可能使其具有成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验