Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Semin Vasc Surg. 2012 Dec;25(4):232-7. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2012.09.009.
Management of the left subclavian artery (LSA) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) continues to be controversial, despite recent guidelines submitted by the Society for Vascular Surgery recommending routine revascularization of the LSA in most circumstances. Up to one third of patients require coverage of the LSA during TEVAR. The LSA provides extensive circulation to the upper extremity, spinal cord, and brain, consequently, sacrifice of this great vessel might not be physiologically tolerated. Studies supporting routine preoperative revascularization of the LSA note increased rates of spinal cord ischemia, strokes, and upper extremity ischemia when the LSA is sacrificed. Other studies supporting a selective revascularization strategy note no difference in neurologic outcomes and recommend expectant management of upper extremity ischemia. In addition, LSA revascularization has associated complications that are avoided by selective revascularization. The purpose of this article is to review and focus the available data in support of routine versus selective LSA revascularization.
在胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)期间,对左锁骨下动脉(LSA)的处理仍然存在争议,尽管血管外科学会最近提交的指南建议在大多数情况下常规重建 LSA。多达三分之一的 TEVAR 患者需要覆盖 LSA。LSA 为上肢、脊髓和大脑提供广泛的循环,因此,牺牲这条大血管可能无法在生理上耐受。支持常规术前 LSA 血运重建的研究指出,当牺牲 LSA 时,脊髓缺血、中风和上肢缺血的发生率增加。支持选择性血运重建策略的其他研究指出,在神经功能结局方面没有差异,并建议对上肢缺血进行期待性管理。此外,LSA 血运重建存在相关并发症,选择性血运重建可避免这些并发症。本文的目的是回顾和集中现有数据,以支持常规与选择性 LSA 血运重建。