Post-Graduate Program in Physical Education, Catholic University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil.
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Aug;27(8):2059-66. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827ddf15.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute effect of a half squat exercise performed with different set configurations on jump potentiation. Twelve resistance-trained men were evaluated on 3 occasions separated by 48-96 hours. First, they performed a 5 repetitions maximum (5RM) test. Subsequently, they performed in a randomized order 2 sessions: one session with 5RM until failure and the other with the same workload but with 30-second rest intervals between repetitions (i.e., cluster set [CS]). Countermovement jump performance was examined during the second and third sessions for jump height and force-time parameters using a force platform at the following time intervals: before and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes. Separate comparisons for each variable at the different time intervals were analyzed using analysis of variance, effect size, and qualitative inferences. The majority of the parameters improved independently of the time they occurred, except for peak force and vertical stiffness after a set until failure. For peak power, it appears that the cluster treatment resulted in superior potentiation at 1 minute, whereas the 5RM treatment resulted in greater potentiation at 9 minutes. Effect size analysis and qualitative outcomes revealed an improvement in vertical stiffness and a lowering in the depth of the countermovement in CS. There were significant correlations between participants' 5RM relative performance and various force-time parameters only in CS. It appears that a CS induces greater peak power than a 5RM set at 1 minute, although the reverse occurs at 9 minutes. Delayed potentiation associated with the 5RM may be attributed to greater fatigue versus the CS approach. Therefore, it follows that the optimal method for inducing peak power potentiation is dependent on the available time between heavy half squat exercise and the subsequent jump performance.
本研究旨在评估不同组次设置的半蹲练习对跳跃增强的急性影响。12 名经过抗阻训练的男性在相隔 48-96 小时的 3 次评估中进行了评估。首先,他们进行了 5 次重复最大(5RM)测试。随后,他们以随机顺序进行了 2 次训练:一次是进行 5RM 直至力竭,另一次则是相同的工作量,但重复之间有 30 秒的休息间隔(即集群组 [CS])。在第 2 和第 3 次训练中,使用力台检查了跳跃高度和力时参数的反跳性能,以下是不同时间间隔的测试:在训练前和 1、3、6、9 和 12 分钟时。使用方差分析、效应量和定性推论分别分析了每个变量在不同时间间隔的单独比较。除了一组力竭后的峰值力和垂直刚度外,大多数参数的改善与时间无关。对于峰值功率,似乎集群处理在 1 分钟时产生了更好的增强效果,而 5RM 处理在 9 分钟时产生了更大的增强效果。效应量分析和定性结果表明,CS 会导致垂直刚度增加和反跳深度降低。只有在 CS 中,参与者的 5RM 相对表现与各种力时参数之间才存在显著相关性。似乎 CS 在 1 分钟时比 5RM 组产生更大的峰值功率,但在 9 分钟时则相反。与 5RM 相关的延迟增强可能归因于与 CS 方法相比,5RM 产生了更大的疲劳。因此,很明显,诱导峰值功率增强的最佳方法取决于重半蹲练习和随后跳跃表现之间的可用时间。