Wang Jian, Xu Jie, Liu Haiyang, Jiang Lizhu
Department of Physical Education, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo, China.
College of Education, Ningde Vocational and Technical College, Ningde, China.
Front Physiol. 2025 Jul 1;16:1521145. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1521145. eCollection 2025.
Blood flow restriction training (BFR training) has gained recognition as a potentially effective intervention; however, its specific effects on upper limb strength and fatigue levels remain inadequately explored. This study aims to systematically assess the impact of BFR training on immediate upper limb strength and fatigue through a meta-analytic approach, with the goal of providing empirical evidence to inform its practical implementation in clinical and athletic settings.
Search PubMed, CNKI, Web of Science and EBSCO databases, collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of BFR training on immediate upper limb strength and fatigue degree. Include and exclude literature through the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Employ Revman5.4 and Stata16.0 software for literature quality assessment and statistical analysis. Utilize sensitivity analysis and funnel plots to evaluate the stability of results and publication bias.
A total of 32 articles and 524 subjects were incorporated. Meta-analysis revealed that upper limb BFR training significantly increased immediate muscle strength [ = 0.36, 95% (0.02, 0.70), = 0.04]. Moreover, BFR training had a significant impact on fatigue degree [ = 1.38, 95% (0.81, 1.94), < 0.00001]. Given the high heterogeneity of the two groups of studies ( = 77%, 88%), subgroup analysis demonstrated that BFR training could significantly enhance bench press strength [ = 0.40, 95% (0.07, 0.74), = 0.02]. When the exercise intensity was 40%-70% of one repetition maximum (1RM) [ = 1.16, 95% (0.83, 1.50), < 0.0001] and the compression intensity was ≥60% AOP [ = 0.64, 95% (0.24, 1.03), = 0.0002], the effects on immediate upper limb strength reached the maximum and were statistically significant respectively. Subgroup analysis of fatigue degree indicated that BFR training could increase the blood lactate value [ = 2.15, 95% (1.06, 3.23), < 0.0001] and subjective fatigue degree (rating of perceived exertion, RPE) [ = 1.11, 95% (0.36, 1.87), = 0.004] of the subjects. Maximal effort [ = 2.61, 95% (2.14, 3.07), < 0.0001] and compressive strength of ≥60% AOP [ = 2.64, 95% (1.35, 4.22), = 0.001] had the greatest and significant effects on fatigue degree.
Upper limb BFR training can significantly enhance bench press strength. BFR training with 40%-70% 1RM and ≥60% AOP is more likely to promote immediate upper limb strength. Compared with resistance training without compression, exhaustive training may have a negative effect on upper limb muscle strength. BFR training combined with maximal effort and ≥60% AOP can increase the blood lactate value and subjective fatigue degree of the subjects.
http://inplasy.com, identifier: INPLASY202430008.
血流限制训练(BFR训练)已被公认为一种潜在有效的干预措施;然而,其对上肢力量和疲劳水平的具体影响仍未得到充分研究。本研究旨在通过荟萃分析系统评估BFR训练对上肢即时力量和疲劳的影响,为其在临床和运动环境中的实际应用提供实证依据。
检索PubMed、CNKI、Web of Science和EBSCO数据库,收集关于BFR训练对上肢即时力量和疲劳程度影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。通过Cochrane偏倚风险工具纳入和排除文献。使用Revman5.4和Stata16.0软件进行文献质量评估和统计分析。利用敏感性分析和漏斗图评估结果的稳定性和发表偏倚。
共纳入32篇文章和524名受试者。荟萃分析显示,上肢BFR训练显著提高了即时肌肉力量[标准化均数差(SMD)=0.36,95%置信区间(CI)(0.02,0.70),P = 0.04]。此外,BFR训练对疲劳程度有显著影响[SMD = 1.38,95%CI(0.81,1.94),P < 0.00001]。鉴于两组研究的异质性较高(I² = 77%,I² = 88%),亚组分析表明,BFR训练可显著提高卧推力量[SMD = 0.40,95%CI(0.07,0.74),P = 0.02]。当运动强度为一次重复最大值(1RM)的40%-70%时[SMD = 1.16,95%CI(0.83,1.50),P < 0.0001],压缩强度≥60%主动脉闭塞压(AOP)时[SMD = 0.64,95%CI(0.24,1.03),P = 0.0002],对上肢即时力量的影响达到最大且具有统计学意义。疲劳程度的亚组分析表明,BFR训练可增加受试者的血乳酸值[SMD = 2.15,95%CI(1.06,3.23),P < 0.0001]和主观疲劳程度(自觉用力程度评分,RPE)[SMD = 1.11,95%CI(0.36,1.87),P = 0.004]。最大努力[SMD = 2.61,95%CI(2.14,3.07),P < 0.0001]和≥60%AOP的压缩强度[SMD = 2.64,95%CI(1.35,4.22),P = 0.001]对疲劳程度的影响最大且具有显著意义。
上肢BFR训练可显著提高卧推力量。40%-70% 1RM且≥60% AOP的BFR训练更有可能促进上肢即时力量。与无压缩的阻力训练相比,力竭训练可能对上肢肌肉力量产生负面影响。BFR训练结合最大努力和≥60% AOP可增加受试者的血乳酸值和主观疲劳程度。