Suppr超能文献

抑郁筛查在治疗前的普及程度:是否存在患者自我选择的模式?

The reach of depression screening preceding treatment: are there patterns of patients' self-selection?

机构信息

Unit for Psychological Medicine, Vuk Vrhovac University Clinic, Merkur Teaching Hospital, Zajčeva 19, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Int J Endocrinol. 2012;2012:148145. doi: 10.1155/2012/148145. Epub 2012 Nov 6.

Abstract

This study evaluated the reach of depression screening followed by treatment programs for subsyndromal depression and explored demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who were reached versus those who were not. A two-item Patient Health Questionnaire-Depression was sent to 4196 type 2 diabetic patients. Positively screened patients were interviewed to assess the severity of depression, and those with subclinical symptoms were invited to treatment groups. The reach of screening procedure was evaluated by the total response rate, proportion of positive depression screenings, and proportion of eligible patients entering treatment programs. Predictors of responsiveness to screening and of participation in treatment were determined using logistic regression. Of the 34% of patients who returned the questionnaire (n = 1442), 40% reported depressive symptoms and a need for professional help (n = 581). Age (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.05-1.08), BMI (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.00-1.04), HbA1C (OR = .92, 95% CI = .86-.99), and LDL-cholesterol (OR = .90, 95% CI = .81-1.00) correlated with response to screening. Willingness to accept treatment was predicted by professional status (OR = 3.24, 95% CI = 1.53-6.87), education (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.05-1.38), and BMI (OR = .91, 95% CI = .85-.98). Older patients with better diabetes control were more likely to be reached by postal screening for depressive symptoms. Professionally inactive, better-educated persons and those with lower BMI were more likely to participate in the intervention for subsyndromal depression.

摘要

本研究评估了对亚临床抑郁症进行抑郁筛查和治疗方案的覆盖面,并探讨了被筛查到和未被筛查到的患者的人口统计学和临床特征。对 4196 名 2 型糖尿病患者发送了两个项目的患者健康问卷-抑郁量表。对阳性筛查患者进行访谈以评估抑郁严重程度,对有亚临床症状的患者邀请参加治疗组。通过总响应率、阳性抑郁筛查比例和进入治疗方案的合格患者比例来评估筛查程序的覆盖面。使用逻辑回归确定对筛查的反应性和参与治疗的预测因素。在返回问卷的 34%的患者中(n = 1442),40%报告有抑郁症状和需要专业帮助(n = 581)。年龄(OR = 1.06,95% CI = 1.05-1.08)、BMI(OR = 1.02,95% CI = 1.00-1.04)、HbA1C(OR =.92,95% CI =.86-.99)和 LDL-胆固醇(OR =.90,95% CI =.81-1.00)与对筛查的反应相关。愿意接受治疗由职业状况(OR = 3.24,95% CI = 1.53-6.87)、教育程度(OR = 1.21,95% CI = 1.05-1.38)和 BMI(OR =.91,95% CI =.85-.98)预测。糖尿病控制较好的老年患者更有可能通过邮寄筛查来发现抑郁症状。职业不活跃、受教育程度较高和 BMI 较低的人更有可能参与亚临床抑郁症的干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/904e/3502847/b7a6e01d49c0/IJE2012-148145.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验