Research Centre for Health Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Cult Health Sex. 2013;15(2):175-90. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2012.746396. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
There are currently few studies exploring doctors' personal perspectives on integrating sexuality into medical consultations. This study focuses on the views of gynaecologists on introducing, or not introducing, sexuality into their work. A total of 30 semi-structured interviews were conducted with gynaecologists in the French-speaking part of Switzerland. The thematic content analysis and computer-assisted lexical analysis (Alceste) on the interview transcripts highlighted four categories: perceptions and description of sexuality, patient's sexological history, training in sexology and perceived difficulties. It is observed that, above all, the 'medical dimension' characterises gynaecologists' perceptions. Of greater interest is our observation of disparities in gynaecologists' discussion of their practice, which is often the product of lay knowledge based on common sense and/or personal experience. Finally, the decision to integrate questions relating to sexuality seems to depend on non-medical factors such as the personal experience, interest or gender of the doctor.
目前，很少有研究探讨医生个人对将性行为纳入医学咨询的看法。本研究重点关注妇科医生对在工作中引入或不引入性行为的看法。对瑞士法语区的 30 名妇科医生进行了半结构化访谈。对访谈记录的主题内容分析和计算机辅助词汇分析（Alceste）突出了四个类别：对性行为的看法和描述、患者的性学史、性学培训和感知到的困难。观察到，首先，“医学维度”是妇科医生看法的特征。更有趣的是，我们观察到妇科医生对其实践的讨论存在差异，这通常是基于常识和/或个人经验的常识性知识的产物。最后，决定纳入与性行为相关的问题似乎取决于非医学因素，如医生的个人经验、兴趣或性别。
