Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Cortex. 2013 Feb;49(2):423-36. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.09.013. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
Cognitive hypotheses of hypnotic phenomena have proposed that executive attentional systems may be either inhibited or overactivated to produce a selective alteration or disconnection of some mental operations. Recent brain imaging studies have reported changes in activity in both medial (anterior cingulate) and lateral (inferior) prefrontal areas during hypnotically induced paralysis, overlapping with areas associated with attentional control as well as inhibitory processes. To compare motor inhibition mechanisms responsible for paralysis during hypnosis and those recruited by voluntary inhibition, we used electroencephalography (EEG) to record brain activity during a modified bimanual Go-Nogo task, which was performed either in a normal baseline condition or during unilateral paralysis caused by hypnotic suggestion or by simulation (in two groups of participants, each tested once with both hands valid and once with unilateral paralysis). This paradigm allowed us to identify patterns of neural activity specifically associated with hypnotically induced paralysis, relative to voluntary inhibition during simulation or Nogo trials. We used a topographical EEG analysis technique to investigate both the spatial organization and the temporal sequence of neural processes activated in these different conditions, and to localize the underlying anatomical generators through minimum-norm methods. We found that preparatory activations were similar in all conditions, despite left hypnotic paralysis, indicating preserved motor intentions. A large P3-like activity was generated by voluntary inhibition during voluntary inhibition (Nogo), with neural sources in medial prefrontal areas, while hypnotic paralysis was associated with a distinctive topography activity during the same time-range and specific sources in right inferior frontal cortex. These results add support to the view that hypnosis might act by enhancing executive control systems mediated by right prefrontal areas, but does not produce paralysis via direct motor inhibition processes normally used for the voluntary suppression of actions.
催眠现象的认知假说提出,执行注意系统可能被抑制或过度激活,以选择性地改变或断开某些心理操作。最近的脑成像研究报告说,在催眠诱导的瘫痪期间,内侧(前扣带)和外侧(下前额)前额区域的活动都发生了变化,与注意力控制以及抑制过程相关的区域重叠。为了比较催眠引起瘫痪时负责运动抑制的机制和自愿抑制时募集的机制,我们使用脑电图(EEG)记录了在改良的双手 Go-Nogo 任务期间的大脑活动,该任务要么在正常基线条件下进行,要么在催眠暗示或模拟引起的单侧瘫痪下进行(在两组参与者中,每组用双手有效和单侧瘫痪各进行一次测试)。这种范式使我们能够确定与催眠诱导的瘫痪相关的特定神经活动模式,相对于模拟或 Nogo 试验期间的自愿抑制。我们使用地形 EEG 分析技术来研究这些不同条件下激活的神经过程的空间组织和时间顺序,并通过最小范数方法定位潜在的解剖学发生器。我们发现,尽管存在左侧催眠性瘫痪,但在所有条件下,预备激活都是相似的,表明运动意图得到了保留。在自愿抑制(Nogo)期间,自愿抑制会产生类似 P3 的大活动,神经源位于前额叶内侧,而催眠性瘫痪则与同一时间范围内的独特地形活动相关,并且右侧下额叶皮质有特定的源。这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即催眠可能通过增强由右前额区域介导的执行控制系统来起作用,但不会通过通常用于自愿抑制动作的直接运动抑制过程产生瘫痪。