Angelini Monica, Calbi Marta, Ferrari Annachiara, Sbriscia-Fioretti Beatrice, Franca Michele, Gallese Vittorio, Umiltà Maria Alessandra
Department of Neuroscience, Unit of Physiology, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy.
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 24;11(3):e0152188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152188. eCollection 2016.
Proactive and reactive inhibition are generally intended as mechanisms allowing the withholding or suppression of overt movements. Nonetheless, inhibition could also play a pivotal role during covert actions (i.e., potential motor acts not overtly performed, despite the activation of the motor system), such as Motor Imagery (MI). In a previous EEG study, we analyzed cerebral activities reactively triggered during two cued Go/NoGo tasks, requiring execution or withholding of overt or covert imagined actions, respectively. This study revealed activation of pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) and right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG), key nodes of the network underpinning reactive inhibition of overt responses in NoGo trials, also during MI enactment, enabling the covert nature of the imagined motor response. Taking into account possible proactive engagement of inhibitory mechanisms by cue signals, for an exhaustive interpretation of these previous findings in the present study we analyzed EEG activities elicited during the preparatory phase of our cued overt and covert Go/NoGo tasks. Our results demonstrate a substantial overlap of cerebral areas activated during proactive recruitment and subsequent reactive implementation of motor inhibition in both overt and covert actions; also, different involvement of pre-SMA and rIFG emerged, in accord with the intended type (covert or overt) of incoming motor responses. During preparation of the overt Go/NoGo task, the cue is encoded in a pragmatic mode, as it primes the possible overt motor response programs in motor and premotor cortex and, through preactivation of a pre-SMA-related decisional mechanism, it triggers a parallel preparation for successful response selection and/or inhibition during the response phase. Conversely, the preparatory strategy for the covert Go/NoGo task is centered on priming of an inhibitory mechanism in rIFG, tuned to the instructed covert modality of motor performance and instantiated during subsequent MI, which allows the imagined response to remain a potential motor act.
主动抑制和反应性抑制通常被视为允许抑制或阻止明显动作的机制。然而,抑制在隐蔽动作(即尽管运动系统被激活,但未明显执行的潜在运动行为)中也可能起关键作用,例如运动想象(MI)。在先前的一项脑电图研究中,我们分析了在两个提示性的“执行/不执行”任务中反应性触发的大脑活动,这两个任务分别要求执行或抑制明显的或隐蔽的想象动作。这项研究揭示了辅助运动前区(pre-SMA)和右侧额下回(rIFG)的激活,这两个区域是在“不执行”试验中支持对明显反应进行反应性抑制的网络的关键节点,在运动想象实施过程中也是如此,从而使想象的运动反应具有隐蔽性。考虑到提示信号可能对抑制机制的主动参与,为了在本研究中对这些先前的发现进行详尽解释,我们分析了在提示性明显和隐蔽“执行/不执行”任务的准备阶段引发的脑电图活动。我们的结果表明,在明显和隐蔽动作中,主动募集和随后运动抑制的反应性实施过程中激活的脑区有大量重叠;此外,根据传入运动反应的预期类型(隐蔽或明显),辅助运动前区和右侧额下回的参与情况也有所不同。在明显“执行/不执行”任务的准备过程中,提示以实用模式进行编码,因为它在运动皮层和运动前皮层中启动了可能的明显运动反应程序,并通过与辅助运动前区相关的决策机制的预激活,在反应阶段触发了对成功反应选择和/或抑制的并行准备。相反,隐蔽“执行/不执行”任务的准备策略集中在右侧额下回抑制机制的启动上,该机制根据指示的隐蔽运动表现模式进行调整,并在随后的运动想象过程中实例化,这使得想象的反应保持为潜在的运动行为。