Suppr超能文献

染色体微阵列分析在正常和阳性产前筛查结果妊娠中的获益与风险:一项回顾性研究。

Benefit versus risk of chromosomal microarray analysis performed in pregnancies with normal and positive prenatal screening results: A retrospective study.

机构信息

Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Assuta Medical Centers Affiliated with Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Department of Academy and Research, Assuta Medical Centers Affiliated with Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 26;16(4):e0250734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250734. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most studies on chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and amniocentesis risks have not evaluated pregnancies with low risk for genetic diseases; therefore, the efficacy and safety of CMA and amniocentesis in this population are unclear. This study aimed to examine the benefits and risks of prenatal genetic diagnostic tests in pregnancies having low risk for chromosomal diseases.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

In this retrospective study, we used clinical data from a large database of 30,830 singleton pregnancies at gestational age 16-23 weeks who underwent amniocentesis for karyotyping with or without CMA. We collected socio-demographic, medical and obstetric information, along with prenatal screening, CMA and karyotyping results. Fetal loss events were also analysed. CMA was performed in 5,837 pregnancies with normal karyotype (CMA cohort). In this cohort, 4,174 women had normal prenatal screening results and the risk for identifying genetic abnormalities with >10% risk for intellectual disability by CMA was 1:102, with no significant difference between maternal age groups. The overall post-amniocentesis fetal loss rate was 1:1,401 for the entire cohort (n = 30,830) and 1:1,945 for the CMA cohort (n = 5,837). The main limitation of this study is the relatively short follow-up of 3 weeks, which may not have been sufficient for detecting all fetal loss events.

CONCLUSION

The low risk for post-amniocentesis fetal loss, compared to the rate of severe genetic abnormalities detected by CMA, suggests that even pregnant women with normal prenatal screening results should consider amniocentesis with CMA.

摘要

背景

大多数关于染色体微阵列分析(CMA)和羊膜穿刺术风险的研究并未评估患有遗传性疾病低风险的妊娠,因此,该人群中 CMA 和羊膜穿刺术的疗效和安全性尚不清楚。本研究旨在检查在患有染色体疾病低风险的妊娠中进行产前遗传诊断测试的益处和风险。

方法和发现

在这项回顾性研究中,我们使用了来自一个大型数据库的 30830 例单胎妊娠的临床数据,这些妊娠在妊娠 16-23 周时接受了羊水穿刺术进行核型分析,同时进行或不进行 CMA。我们收集了社会人口统计学、医疗和产科信息,以及产前筛查、CMA 和核型分析结果。还分析了胎儿丢失事件。在正常核型的 5837 例妊娠中进行了 CMA(CMA 队列)。在该队列中,4174 名女性的产前筛查结果正常,通过 CMA 识别具有 >10%智力残疾风险的遗传异常的风险为 1:102,且在不同的母亲年龄组之间无显著差异。整个羊水穿刺术后的胎儿丢失率为 1:1401(整个队列 n=30830)和 1:1945(CMA 队列 n=5837)。本研究的主要局限性是随访时间相对较短(3 周),可能不足以检测到所有胎儿丢失事件。

结论

与 CMA 检测到的严重遗传异常率相比,羊水穿刺术后的胎儿丢失风险较低,这表明即使是产前筛查结果正常的孕妇也应考虑进行 CMA 羊水穿刺术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9860/8075189/818ba07ceb5a/pone.0250734.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验