Division of Infectious Diseases, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, Harper University Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2012 Dec;46(12):1587-97. doi: 10.1345/aph.1R211. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
Guidelines recommend that agents other than vancomycin be considered for some types of infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) when the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to vancomycin is 2 μg/mL or more. Alternative therapeutic options include daptomycin and linezolid, 2 relatively new and expensive drugs, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), an old and inexpensive agent.
To compare the clinical efficacy and potential cost savings associated with use of TMP/SMX compared to linezolid and daptomycin.
A retrospective study was conducted at Detroit Medical Center. For calendar year 2009, unique adults (age >18 years) with infections due to MRSA with an MIC to vancomycin of 2 μg/mL were included if they received 2 or more doses of TMP/SMX and/or daptomycin and/or linezolid. Data were abstracted from patient charts and pharmacy records.
There were 328 patients included in the study cohort: 143 received TMP/SMX alone, 89 received daptomycin alone, 75 received linezolid alone, and 21 patients received a combination of 2 or more of these agents. In univariate analysis, patients who received TMP/SMX alone had significantly better outcomes, including in-hospital (p = 0.003) and 90-day mortality (p < 0.001) compared to patients treated with daptomycin or linezolid. Patients receiving TMP/SMX were also younger (p < 0.001), had fewer comorbid conditions (p < 0.001), had less severe acute severity of illness (p < 0.001), and received appropriate therapy more rapidly (p = 0.001). In multivariate models the association between TMP/SMX treatment and mortality was no longer significant. Antimicrobial cost savings associated with using TMP/SMX averaged $2067.40 per patient.
TMP/SMX monotherapy compared favorably to linezolid and daptomycin in terms of treatment efficacy and mortality. Use of TMP/SMX instead of linezolid or daptomycin could potentially significantly reduce antibiotic costs. TMP/SMX should be considered for the treatment of MRSA infection with MIC of 2 μg/mL to vancomycin.
由于耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)为 2μg/mL 或更高,对于某些类型的感染,建议考虑使用万古霉素以外的药物。替代治疗方案包括达托霉素和利奈唑胺,这两种都是相对较新且昂贵的药物,以及甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑(TMP/SMX),这是一种古老且廉价的药物。
比较 TMP/SMX 与利奈唑胺和达托霉素相比,与临床疗效相关的潜在成本节约。
在底特律医疗中心进行了一项回顾性研究。对于 2009 年,患有 MRSA 感染且万古霉素 MIC 为 2μg/mL 的独特成人(年龄>18 岁),如果他们接受了 2 剂或更多剂量的 TMP/SMX 和/或达托霉素和/或利奈唑胺,则将其纳入研究队列。数据从患者图表和药房记录中提取。
研究队列中共有 328 名患者:143 名患者单独接受 TMP/SMX 治疗,89 名患者单独接受达托霉素治疗,75 名患者单独接受利奈唑胺治疗,21 名患者接受了 2 种或多种药物联合治疗。在单变量分析中,与接受达托霉素或利奈唑胺治疗的患者相比,单独接受 TMP/SMX 治疗的患者的结果有显著改善,包括住院期间(p=0.003)和 90 天死亡率(p<0.001)。接受 TMP/SMX 治疗的患者也更年轻(p<0.001),合并症更少(p<0.001),急性严重程度较轻(p<0.001),并且更快接受了适当的治疗(p=0.001)。在多变量模型中,TMP/SMX 治疗与死亡率之间的关联不再具有统计学意义。使用 TMP/SMX 可节省的抗生素相关成本平均为每位患者 2067.40 美元。
TMP/SMX 单药治疗在疗效和死亡率方面优于利奈唑胺和达托霉素。使用 TMP/SMX 替代利奈唑胺或达托霉素可能会显著降低抗生素成本。对于 MIC 为 2μg/mL 的万古霉素的 MRSA 感染,应考虑使用 TMP/SMX 进行治疗。