Suppr超能文献

万古霉素、达托霉素、抗葡萄球菌β-内酰胺类药物以及甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑单药治疗与联合治疗在耐甲氧西林感染管理中的应用:一项网状Meta分析

Vancomycin, Daptomycin, Antistaphylococcal β-Lactam, and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Monotherapy and Combination Therapy in the Management of Methicillin-Resistant : A Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Xu Xiaonan, Lu Ni, Song Pan, Zhou Mingzhen, Li Yuanxiao, Wang Zirui, Gao Xin

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

The Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2022 May 17;13:805966. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.805966. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vancomycin or daptomycin (VAN/DAP), antistaphylococcal β-lactam (ASBL), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), and combination therapy of VAN/DAP + ASBL in the management of methicillin-resistant aureus (MRSA). Databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase database, and google scholar were searched on 1 September 2021. The randomized control trials (RCTs) and comparable clinical studies of VAN/DAP, VAN/DAP + ASBL, ASBL, and TMP-SMX in the management of MRSA were identified. A network meta-analysis was conducted with STATA 14.0. Seven RCTs and two matched cohorts with 1,048 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled results showed that VAN/DAP + ASBL had a significantly lower rate of persistent bacteremia >3 days than VAN/DAP alone [OR:0.46, 95%CI (0.26, 0.81), < 0.001]. No obvious differences were observed in the outcomes of all-cause mortality, relapsed bacteremia, microbiological treatment failure, embolic or metastatic infection, and total adverse events. However, the ranking results showed that VAN/DAP + ASBL had slightly better efficacy (all-cause mortality, persistent bacteremia >3 days, duration of bacteremia, microbiological treatment failure, and relapsed bacteremia) but slightly higher adverse events than VAN/DAP alone. No obvious differences in the comparisons of VAN/DAP vs. ASBL, and VAN/DAP vs TMP-SMX in the analyzed outcomes. The ranking results revealed that ASBL and TMP-SMX did not have better efficacy or lower adverse events compared with the treatment of VAN/DAP. The efficacy of VAN/DAP + ASBL was slightly but not significantly better than VAN/DAP alone in the management of MRSA.

摘要

目的是评估万古霉素或达托霉素(VAN/DAP)、抗葡萄球菌β-内酰胺类药物(ASBL)、甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMX)以及VAN/DAP + ASBL联合疗法在耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)治疗中的疗效和安全性。于2021年9月1日检索了包括PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase数据库和谷歌学术在内的数据库。确定了关于VAN/DAP、VAN/DAP + ASBL、ASBL和TMP-SMX治疗MRSA的随机对照试验(RCT)和可比临床研究。使用STATA 14.0进行网络荟萃分析。分析纳入了7项RCT和2项匹配队列研究,共1048例患者。汇总结果显示,VAN/DAP + ASBL持续菌血症>3天的发生率显著低于单独使用VAN/DAP [比值比(OR):0.46,95%置信区间(CI)(0.26,0.81),P<0.001]。在全因死亡率、复发性菌血症、微生物治疗失败、栓塞或转移性感染以及总不良事件的结局方面未观察到明显差异。然而,排序结果显示,VAN/DAP + ASBL的疗效(全因死亡率、持续菌血症>3天、菌血症持续时间、微生物治疗失败和复发性菌血症)略优于单独使用VAN/DAP,但不良事件略多。在分析的结局中,VAN/DAP与ASBL、VAN/DAP与TMP-SMX的比较无明显差异。排序结果显示,与VAN/DAP治疗相比,ASBL和TMP-SMX的疗效并不更好,不良事件也未更低。在MRSA治疗中,VAN/DAP + ASBL的疗效略优于单独使用VAN/DAP,但差异不显著。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6392/9152223/2335f3955832/fphar-13-805966-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验