Carolina Global Breastfeeding Institute, Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7445, USA.
Breastfeed Med. 2012 Dec;7(6):397-402. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2012.9975.
There has been a significant increase in the number of published peer-reviewed articles on breastfeeding over the last two decades. However, in part because of the lack of clear or consistent definitions used in these publications, generalization and comparison of findings have been difficult, and interpretation of findings is often limited. This study was undertaken to examine this issue by assessing if and what definitions of breastfeeding have been used in a variety of relevant journals and the source of those definitions.
An iterative systematic approach was used to select articles for review from major breastfeeding and health-related journals. Articles were reviewed for use of breastfeeding terminology, descriptors (e.g., exclusive, partial), and full definitions. Descriptive analysis was carried out using Excel (Microsoft(®), Redmond, WA). A flow chart was developed to examine sources of definitions in use.
Descriptors are seen 68% of the time, and full definitions are only offered in slightly more than a quarter (28%) of the articles. Among those journals that are primarily dedicated to breastfeeding research, 43-64% included descriptors, and 20-29% included definition of the descriptor. The pediatric journal included a high percentage with descriptors (77%), but only 18% were defined further. Among the other journals, there was a wide range (0-60%) with descriptors but fewer providing definitions. Only 26 articles offered a definition, and of these, 21 articles included a citation. Most derived from the Interagency Group for Action on Breastfeeding and World Health Organization definitional schemas.
There remains a need by journals for increased requirement of inclusion of breastfeeding definitions and by researchers of attention to their use. For this to occur, there must first be the reconfirmation and/or development of a set of consistently utilized definitions that are applicable for the study of behaviors, support interventions, and health outcomes for both the mother and of the child. Therefore, an inclusionary international Working Group Process Approach is recommended, similar to that used in 1988, with confirmation and dissemination by all major organizations and agencies.
在过去的二十年中,发表的有关母乳喂养的同行评审文章数量显著增加。然而,部分原因是这些出版物中使用的定义不明确或不一致,因此难以进行概括和比较研究结果,并且对研究结果的解释通常也受到限制。本研究通过评估各种相关期刊中使用的母乳喂养定义以及这些定义的来源,来检查这个问题。
采用迭代系统方法从主要的母乳喂养和健康相关期刊中选择要审查的文章。对文章中使用的母乳喂养术语、描述符(例如,纯母乳喂养、部分母乳喂养)和完整定义进行了审查。使用 Excel(Microsoft(®),雷德蒙德,华盛顿州)进行描述性分析。制定了流程图以检查使用中的定义来源。
描述符出现的频率为 68%,完整定义仅在略多于四分之一(28%)的文章中提供。在主要致力于母乳喂养研究的期刊中,43-64%的期刊包含描述符,20-29%的期刊包含描述符的定义。儿科期刊包含的描述符比例较高(77%),但进一步定义的比例仅为 18%。在其他期刊中,描述符的比例差异较大(0-60%),但提供定义的期刊较少。只有 26 篇文章提供了定义,其中 21 篇文章引用了来源。这些定义大多来自母乳喂养行动机构间小组和世界卫生组织的定义方案。
期刊需要增加对纳入母乳喂养定义的要求,研究人员也需要注意定义的使用。为了实现这一目标,首先必须重新确认和/或制定一套一致使用的定义,这些定义适用于对母亲和儿童的行为、支持干预和健康结果进行研究。因此,建议采用类似于 1988 年使用的纳入性国际工作组方法,由所有主要组织和机构进行确认和传播。