• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新诊断糖尿病成人患者接受胰岛素治疗 18 个月后的应答者:哪种胰岛素方案?

Responders to insulin therapy at 18 months in adults with newly diagnosed diabetes: which insulin regimen?

机构信息

School of Graduate Entry Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2013 Mar;30(3):e95-100. doi: 10.1111/dme.12096.

DOI:10.1111/dme.12096
PMID:23215947
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe baseline characteristics of responders to insulin therapy (HbA(1c) targets < 58 mmol/mol, 7.5%) at 18 months among adults with newly diagnosed diabetes.

METHODS

A retrospective UK study derived from 479 general practices electronic dataset. We included all adults (age > 18 years) with newly diagnosed diabetes who required insulin therapy within 6 months of diagnosis. The data comprised insulin regimen (long-acting only; premixed insulin only; basal bolus insulin regimen), gender, Townsend quintile, baseline and an 18-month measurement of clinical and biochemical variables. Multiple imputations were undertaken and logistic regression used to assess the effect of covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 1492 patients (aged 19-93 years) were analysed. Means (SD) baseline HbA(1c) and BMI were 10.3% (2.6%) and 29.6 (7.0%), respectively. Following multiple imputation for missing data, logistic regression analysis indicated important covariates to achieve HbA(1c) targets were baseline HbA(1c), lipid lowering therapy, gender and age. Including all covariates, those treated with premixed insulin were 47% more likely to achieve target HbA(1c) at 18 months than those treated with a basal-bolus regimes (adjusted OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.12-1.92, P = 0.006)) and 32% more likely than those treated with long-acting insulin was (adjusted OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.01-1.74, P = 0.044). Those with a higher baseline HbA(1c) level, on lipid-lowering therapy, women and younger patients had a lower response rate. Mean weight gain (SD) was 2.4 kg (8.5 kg) and was not influenced by treatment regimen.

CONCLUSION

The use of premixed insulin regimen among newly diagnosed patients with diabetes appears to be most effective in reaching HbA(1c) target values, independent of other confounders. The appropriate choice of insulin regimen at initiation should therefore take into account various metabolic and psychosocial factors.

摘要

目的

描述新诊断糖尿病患者接受胰岛素治疗 18 个月后(HbA1c 目标<58mmol/mol,7.5%)应答者的基线特征。

方法

这是一项来自英国 479 家普通诊所电子数据库的回顾性研究。我们纳入了所有在诊断后 6 个月内需要胰岛素治疗的新诊断糖尿病成人(年龄>18 岁)。数据包括胰岛素方案(仅长效;仅预混胰岛素;基础-餐时胰岛素方案)、性别、汤森德五分位数、基线和 18 个月的临床和生化变量测量值。采用多重插补法进行缺失数据的处理,并使用逻辑回归评估协变量的影响。

结果

共分析了 1492 例患者(年龄 19-93 岁)。HbA1c 和 BMI 的平均值(标准差)分别为 10.3%(2.6%)和 29.6(7.0%)。在对缺失数据进行多重插补后,逻辑回归分析表明,实现 HbA1c 目标的重要协变量是基线 HbA1c、降脂治疗、性别和年龄。将所有协变量纳入后,与接受基础-餐时胰岛素治疗的患者相比,接受预混胰岛素治疗的患者在 18 个月时达到 HbA1c 目标的可能性高 47%(校正比值比 1.47;95%置信区间 1.12-1.92,P=0.006),而与接受长效胰岛素治疗的患者相比,达到目标的可能性高 32%(校正比值比 1.32;95%置信区间 1.01-1.74,P=0.044)。基线 HbA1c 水平较高、正在接受降脂治疗、女性和年轻患者的应答率较低。平均体重增加(标准差)为 2.4kg(8.5kg),与治疗方案无关。

结论

在新诊断的糖尿病患者中,使用预混胰岛素方案似乎是达到 HbA1c 目标值最有效的方法,独立于其他混杂因素。因此,在开始时选择合适的胰岛素方案时,应考虑各种代谢和心理社会因素。

相似文献

1
Responders to insulin therapy at 18 months in adults with newly diagnosed diabetes: which insulin regimen?新诊断糖尿病成人患者接受胰岛素治疗 18 个月后的应答者:哪种胰岛素方案?
Diabet Med. 2013 Mar;30(3):e95-100. doi: 10.1111/dme.12096.
2
Optimization of insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: beyond basal insulin.2 型糖尿病患者胰岛素治疗的优化:超越基础胰岛素。
Diabet Med. 2012 Jul;29(7):e13-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03586.x.
3
Clinical effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30:70 versus biphasic human insulin 30 in UK general clinical practice: a retrospective database study.在英国常规临床实践中,双相门冬胰岛素 30/70 与双相人胰岛素 30 的临床疗效比较:一项回顾性数据库研究。
Clin Ther. 2011 Jan;33(1):27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.01.023.
4
Long-term efficacy of insulin glargine after switching from NPH insulin as intensive replacement of basal insulin in Japanese diabetes mellitus. Comparison of efficacy between type 1 and type 2 diabetes (JUN-LAN Study 1.2).在日本糖尿病患者中,从NPH胰岛素转换为甘精胰岛素作为基础胰岛素强化替代治疗后的长期疗效。1型和2型糖尿病疗效比较(JUN-LAN研究1.2)
Endocr J. 2007 Dec;54(6):975-83. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.k07e-035. Epub 2007 Nov 14.
5
Predictors of glycaemic control in patients with Type 1 diabetes commencing continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy.1 型糖尿病患者起始持续皮下胰岛素输注治疗的血糖控制预测因素。
Diabet Med. 2010 Mar;27(3):339-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02925.x.
6
Glycemic control with insulin glargine plus insulin glulisine versus premixed insulin analogues in real-world practices: a cost-effectiveness study with a randomized pragmatic trial design.在真实实践中使用甘精胰岛素加谷赖胰岛素与预混胰岛素类似物控制血糖:一项具有随机实用试验设计的成本效益研究。
Clin Ther. 2011 Jul;33(7):841-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.05.091. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
7
Comparison of biphasic insulin aspart 30 given three times daily or twice daily in combination with metformin versus oral antidiabetic drugs alone in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: a 16-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial conducted in russia.在俄罗斯进行的一项为期16周的随机、开放标签、平行组试验:比较每日三次或每日两次给予门冬胰岛素30联合二甲双胍与单用口服抗糖尿病药物治疗2型糖尿病控制不佳患者的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2007 Nov;29(11):2374-84. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.11.017.
8
Mealtime 50/50 basal + prandial insulin analogue mixture with a basal insulin analogue, both plus metformin, in the achievement of target HbA1c and pre- and postprandial blood glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: a multinational, 24-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparison.在2型糖尿病患者中,使用基础胰岛素类似物的餐时50/50基础胰岛素与餐时胰岛素类似物混合制剂,并联合二甲双胍,以实现糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)目标值以及餐前和餐后血糖水平:一项多国、24周、随机、开放标签、平行组对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 Nov;29(11):2349-64. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.11.016.
9
Benefits of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in children with type 1 diabetes.持续皮下胰岛素输注对1型糖尿病儿童的益处。
J Pediatr. 2003 Dec;143(6):796-801. doi: 10.1067/S0022-3476(03)00579-1.
10
Antidiabetic prescriptions and glycemic control in German patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective database study.德国2型糖尿病患者的抗糖尿病处方与血糖控制:一项回顾性数据库研究
Clin Ther. 2007 Feb;29(2):316-25. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Medications and medical costs for diabetes patients with or without chronic respiratory disease in Beijing, China: A retrospective study.中国北京的糖尿病患者伴或不伴慢性呼吸系统疾病的药物治疗和医疗费用:一项回顾性研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 26;13:980982. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.980982. eCollection 2022.
2
Determinants of weight change in patients on basal insulin treatment: an analysis of the DIVE registry.基础胰岛素治疗患者体重变化的决定因素:DIVE注册研究分析
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017 Jan 25;5(1):e000301. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000301. eCollection 2017.
3
Obesity independently predicts responders to biphasic insulin 50/50 (Humalog Mix50 and Insuman Comb 50) following conversion from other insulin regimens: a retrospective cohort study.
肥胖症独立预测了接受其他胰岛素方案转换后的双相胰岛素 50/50(优泌乐 50 和优泌林 50)治疗的应答者:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2014 May 7;2(1):e000021. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2014-000021. eCollection 2014.