Division of Medical Sciences & Graduate Entry Medicine , School of Medicine, University of Nottingham , Derby , UK.
Trent Research Design Services , University of Nottingham , Nottingham , UK.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2014 May 7;2(1):e000021. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2014-000021. eCollection 2014.
This study aims to examine the metabolic effects of intensification or initiation of insulin treatment with biphasic insulin 50/50, and determine the predictors of responders or non-responders to biphasic insulin 50/50.
A cohort of 2183 patients ≥18 years with diabetes, newly treated with biphasic insulin 50/50 between January 2000 and May 2012, were sourced from UK General Practices via The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database. Baseline clinical parameters of 1267 patients with suboptimal glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) >7.5% (>58 mmol/mol) who had received background insulin regimens for at least 6 months preceding biphasic insulin 50/50 were compared against 12-month outcome data. Responders were defined as those with HbA1c <7.5% (58 mmol/mol) and/or HbA1c reduction of ≥1% (10.9 mmol/mol) at 12 months. Comparative analyses were carried out on subgroups of 237 patients initiating insulin therapy with biphasic insulin 50/50, and between users of the Humalog Mix50 (HM50) versus Insuman Comb 50 (IC50). Associations were examined using t tests and multivariate logistic regression techniques.
The overall mean HbA1c reduction at 12 months as a result of intensification and initiation with biphasic insulin 50/50 was 0.5% (5.5 mmol/mol) and 1.6% (17.5 mmol/mol), respectively. Adjusted ORs show obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m(2)), treatment duration for ≥9 months, and baseline HbA1c are independent determinants of responders. In addition, stratified for baseline HbA1c levels, HM50 was associated with better HbA1c outcome compared with IC50.
biphasic insulin 50/50 is effective for achieving glycemic control in suboptimal HbA1c levels, especially among obese patients with insulin-treated diabetes. Stratified for baseline HbA1c, HM50 was associated with improved HbA1c outcome compared with IC50.
本研究旨在观察强化或起始使用双相胰岛素 50/50 治疗对代谢的影响,并确定对双相胰岛素 50/50 有反应或无反应的预测因子。
通过 The Health Improvement Network(THIN)数据库,从英国普通诊所中获取了 2000 年 1 月至 2012 年 5 月期间新接受双相胰岛素 50/50 治疗的 2183 例年龄≥18 岁的糖尿病患者。对 1267 例基线糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)>7.5%(>58mmol/mol)且在接受双相胰岛素 50/50 治疗前至少接受了 6 个月背景胰岛素治疗的患者的基线临床参数进行比较,并对这些患者的 12 个月结果数据进行分析。将 HbA1c<7.5%(58mmol/mol)和/或 12 个月时 HbA1c 降低≥1%(10.9mmol/mol)定义为有反应者。对 237 例新起始使用双相胰岛素 50/50 治疗的患者进行亚组分析,并比较了 Humalog Mix50(HM50)和 Insuman Comb 50(IC50)使用者之间的差异。使用 t 检验和多变量逻辑回归技术进行相关性分析。
强化和起始使用双相胰岛素 50/50 治疗 12 个月后,HbA1c 的总体平均降低幅度分别为 0.5%(5.5mmol/mol)和 1.6%(17.5mmol/mol)。调整后的比值比显示肥胖(体重指数>30kg/m2)、治疗时间≥9 个月和基线 HbA1c 是有反应者的独立决定因素。此外,按基线 HbA1c 水平分层,与 IC50 相比,HM50 与更好的 HbA1c 结果相关。
双相胰岛素 50/50 可有效控制血糖,尤其对肥胖的胰岛素治疗糖尿病患者效果明显。与 IC50 相比,按基线 HbA1c 分层,HM50 与 HbA1c 结果的改善相关。