Suppr超能文献

加拿大早产儿视网膜病变筛查标准的国家差异:现有指南与实际实践模式。

National variations in retinopathy of prematurity screening criteria in Canada: existent guidelines and actual practice patterns.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.

出版信息

Can J Ophthalmol. 2012 Dec;47(6):473-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.08.012.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To survey the current inclusion criteria used for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening across tertiary level 3 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Clinical directors from 29 level 3 NICUs in Canada.

METHODS

Survey of all 29 level 3 NICUs in Canada in September 2010. The survey inquired about the current ROP screening criteria in use in each centre including which neonates are enrolled in the screening program and the timing of when screening begins. The survey was sent via email to the clinical directors at each site. Nonrespondents were contacted by telephone.

RESULTS

In total, 23 centres replied, representing a 79% response rate with the survey. Seven different ROP screening inclusion criteria were found to be in use, although one of the centres did not have a clear inclusion protocol. The variation between centres was significant, with some using a combination of birth weight and gestational age and others using birth weight or gestational age alone as their criterion. There was also variation in the timing of initial eye examinations, with 8 different criteria currently in use. Discrepancies were also found among treatment patterns at the centres.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the publication of updated Canadian guidelines in 2000, there continues to be significant variation in the actual inclusion criteria being used across the country. Therefore, a need exists for comprehensive, evidence-based Canadian guidelines to optimize the screening inclusion criteria for ROP.

摘要

目的

调查加拿大三级新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)筛查目前使用的纳入标准。

参与者

来自加拿大 29 家三级 NICU 的临床主任。

方法

2010 年 9 月对加拿大所有 29 家三级 NICU 进行调查。该调查询问了每个中心目前使用的 ROP 筛查标准,包括哪些新生儿被纳入筛查计划以及筛查开始的时间。该调查通过电子邮件发送给每个站点的临床主任。对未回复的人员进行电话联系。

结果

共有 23 家中心回复,回复率为 79%。发现有 7 种不同的 ROP 筛查纳入标准正在使用,尽管其中一个中心没有明确的纳入协议。中心之间的差异很大,一些中心同时使用体重和胎龄作为标准,而另一些中心则单独使用体重或胎龄作为标准。初始眼部检查的时间也存在差异,目前有 8 种不同的标准在使用。各中心的治疗模式也存在差异。

结论

尽管加拿大在 2000 年发布了更新的指南,但全国范围内实际使用的纳入标准仍存在显著差异。因此,需要制定全面的、基于证据的加拿大指南,以优化 ROP 的筛查纳入标准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验