• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二进制口腔发育不良分级系统:有效性检验及改进建议。

The binary oral dysplasia grading system: validity testing and suggested improvement.

机构信息

Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Jan;115(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.10.015.

DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2012.10.015
PMID:23217539
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A binary system is reputed to be superior to the World Health Organization (WHO) system in grading oral dysplasia. We aimed to validate its reproducibility and prognostic ability and examine whether it could be improved.

STUDY DESIGN

Three pathologists graded 141 oral epithelial dysplasia biopsies with the use of both systems. Observer variability and prognostic ability were assessed with the use of kappa and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The binary system showed superior agreement to the WHO system (multirater kappa 0.59 vs. 0.49, respectively) but similar prognostic ability (odds ratio [OR] 4.59 [P = .014] vs. OR 2.25 [P = .02], respectively). Adding smoking and alcohol slightly improved the prognostic ability of both systems (OR 5.10 vs. OR 2.42, respectively). Our new binary system with a refined diagnostic threshold demonstrated a slightly greater prognostic ability and improved ability to differentiate between high- and low-risk moderate dysplasia cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The binary system has similar prognostic ability but superior reproducibility compared with the WHO system. Prognostication is improved still further by using a new threshold.

摘要

目的

二进制系统在口腔发育不良分级方面据称优于世界卫生组织(WHO)系统。我们旨在验证其可重复性和预后能力,并研究是否可以改善。

研究设计

三位病理学家使用两种系统对 141 例口腔上皮发育不良活检进行分级。使用kappa 和逻辑回归模型评估观察者的变异性和预后能力。

结果

二进制系统与 WHO 系统相比显示出更高的一致性(多评估者 kappa 值分别为 0.59 和 0.49),但预后能力相似(比值比 [OR] 分别为 4.59 [P =.014] 和 2.25 [P =.02])。添加吸烟和饮酒略微改善了两种系统的预后能力(OR 分别为 5.10 和 2.42)。我们的新二进制系统具有更精细的诊断阈值,显示出稍高的预后能力,并改善了区分高风险和低风险中度发育不良病例的能力。

结论

与 WHO 系统相比,二进制系统具有相似的预后能力,但具有更高的可重复性。使用新阈值进一步改善了预后。

相似文献

1
The binary oral dysplasia grading system: validity testing and suggested improvement.二进制口腔发育不良分级系统:有效性检验及改进建议。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Jan;115(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.10.015.
2
A head-to-head comparison of four grading systems for oral epithelial dysplasia.口腔上皮发育异常四种分级系统的直接比较。
Histopathology. 2025 May;86(6):933-941. doi: 10.1111/his.15400. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
3
Evaluation of a new binary system of grading oral epithelial dysplasia for prediction of malignant transformation.一种用于预测恶变的口腔上皮发育异常新分级二元系统的评估。
Oral Oncol. 2006 Nov;42(10):987-93. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.12.014. Epub 2006 May 30.
4
Inter- and Intra-Observer Variability in Diagnosis of Oral Dysplasia.口腔发育异常诊断中的观察者间和观察者内变异性。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017 Dec 29;18(12):3251-3254. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.12.3251.
5
Malignant transformation of oral epithelial dysplasia: a real-world evaluation of histopathologic grading.口腔上皮发育异常的恶性转化:组织病理学分级的真实世界评估
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014 Mar;117(3):343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2013.09.017. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
6
Grading oral epithelial dysplasia: analysis of individual features.口腔上皮异型增生分级:个别特征分析。
J Oral Pathol Med. 2011 Aug;40(7):533-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2011.01033.x. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
7
Malignant transformation of oral epithelial dysplasia: clinicopathological risk factors and outcome analysis in a retrospective cohort of 138 cases.口腔上皮异型增生恶变:回顾性队列研究 138 例的临床病理危险因素和结果分析。
Histopathology. 2011 Oct;59(4):733-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03938.x. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
8
Understanding interobserver variability of pathologists to improve oral epithelial dysplasia grading.了解病理学家之间的观察者间变异性以改进口腔上皮发育异常分级。
Oral Dis. 2025 Mar;31(3):838-845. doi: 10.1111/odi.15078. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
9
Why oral histopathology suffers inter-observer variability on grading oral epithelial dysplasia: an attempt to understand the sources of variation.为何口腔组织病理学在口腔上皮发育异常分级方面存在观察者间差异:对变异来源的探究。
Oral Oncol. 2007 Mar;43(3):224-31. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2006.03.009. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
10
Reproducibility of grading systems in oral epithelial dysplasia.口腔上皮异型增生分级系统的可重复性。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Nov 1;17(6):e935-42. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17749.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of an artificial intelligence-based pipeline for predicting oral epithelial dysplasia malignant transformation.用于预测口腔上皮异常增生恶性转化的基于人工智能的流程的开发与验证。
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 May 20;5(1):186. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00873-z.
2
Salivary EGF: EGFR ratio as potential early diagnostic biomarker for oral cancer detection in tobacco chewers: a preliminary cross-sectional study.唾液表皮生长因子(EGF)与表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)的比值作为嚼烟者口腔癌检测的潜在早期诊断生物标志物:一项初步横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 29;25(1):663. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05982-8.
3
Artificial intelligence based vision transformer application for grading histopathological images of oral epithelial dysplasia: a step towards AI-driven diagnosis.
基于人工智能的视觉变换器在口腔上皮发育异常组织病理学图像分级中的应用:迈向人工智能驱动诊断的一步。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 25;25(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14193-x.
4
S100A7 as a predictive biomarker in malignant transformation of oral epithelial dysplastic lesions.S100A7作为口腔上皮发育异常病变恶性转化的预测生物标志物。
Discov Oncol. 2025 Apr 25;16(1):610. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02418-1.
5
Diagnostic Criteria for Oral Epithelial Dysplasia: Predicting Malignant Transformation.口腔上皮发育异常的诊断标准:预测恶性转化
Head Neck Pathol. 2025 Feb 7;19(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s12105-025-01754-6.
6
Convolutional neural networks for accurate real-time diagnosis of oral epithelial dysplasia and oral squamous cell carcinoma using high-resolution in vivo confocal microscopy.利用高分辨率体内共聚焦显微镜,通过卷积神经网络实现口腔上皮发育异常和口腔鳞状细胞癌的准确实时诊断。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):2555. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86400-5.
7
A head-to-head comparison of four grading systems for oral epithelial dysplasia.口腔上皮发育异常四种分级系统的直接比较。
Histopathology. 2025 May;86(6):933-941. doi: 10.1111/his.15400. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
8
A novel AI-based score for assessing the prognostic value of intra-epithelial lymphocytes in oral epithelial dysplasia.一种基于人工智能的新型评分系统,用于评估口腔上皮异常增生中上皮内淋巴细胞的预后价值。
Br J Cancer. 2025 Feb;132(2):168-179. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02916-z. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
9
Artificial Intelligence Applications in Oral Cancer and Oral Dysplasia.人工智能在口腔癌和口腔发育异常中的应用。
Tissue Eng Part A. 2024 Oct;30(19-20):640-651. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2024.0096. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
10
Understanding interobserver variability of pathologists to improve oral epithelial dysplasia grading.了解病理学家之间的观察者间变异性以改进口腔上皮发育异常分级。
Oral Dis. 2025 Mar;31(3):838-845. doi: 10.1111/odi.15078. Epub 2024 Jul 22.