• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对口吃儿童:现象学分析。

Coping with a child who stutters: a phenomenological analysis.

机构信息

Auburn University, United States.

出版信息

J Fluency Disord. 2012 Dec;37(4):275-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.06.002
PMID:23218211
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Qualitative methods were used in the form of a phenomenological analysis to explore how families cope with having a child who stutters. Twelve participants, 2 men and 10 women, who have children who stutter participated in this study. The participants were asked to consider their experiences with being the parent of a child who stutters. Analysis of these data resulted in 3 primary categories. The results indicate that parents experience and cope with stresses associated with being the parent of a child who stutters. The participants described feelings of uncertainty and concern as well as the desire to do what is best for their children. Results highlight the importance of providing information and avenues of support that will help parents more effectively cope with having a child who stutters.

EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES

The reader will be able to: (a) describe, from the perspective of a parent of a child who stutters, the themes associated with the process of coping with a child who stutters, (b) describe types of coping resources, (c) describe the factors that influence the choice to use emotion-focused and problem-focused coping strategies, and (d) describe four specific areas to consider when providing resources for families of children who stutter.

摘要

未加标签

采用现象学分析的定性方法来探讨有口吃儿童的家庭如何应对。本研究共有 12 名参与者,包括 2 名男性和 10 名女性,他们的孩子有口吃问题。要求参与者考虑作为口吃儿童的父母的经历。对这些数据的分析得出了 3 个主要类别。结果表明,父母会经历并应对与口吃儿童的父母有关的压力。参与者描述了不确定性和担忧的感觉,以及为孩子做最好的事情的愿望。结果强调了提供信息和支持途径的重要性,这将有助于父母更有效地应对有口吃儿童的问题。

教育目标

读者将能够:(a) 从口吃儿童的父母的角度描述与应对口吃儿童过程相关的主题,(b) 描述应对资源的类型,(c) 描述影响选择使用情绪聚焦和问题聚焦应对策略的因素,以及 (d) 描述为口吃儿童的家庭提供资源时需要考虑的四个具体方面。

相似文献

1
Coping with a child who stutters: a phenomenological analysis.应对口吃儿童:现象学分析。
J Fluency Disord. 2012 Dec;37(4):275-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jun 23.
2
The experiences of living with a sibling who stutters: a preliminary study.与口吃的兄弟姐妹一起生活的经历:一项初步研究。
J Fluency Disord. 2012 Jun;37(2):135-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
3
Coping responses by adults who stutter: part I. Protecting the self and others.口吃成年人的应对反应:第一部分。保护自我与他人。
J Fluency Disord. 2009 Jun;34(2):87-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2009.06.001. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
4
Coping responses by adults who stutter: part II. Approaching the problem and achieving agency.口吃成年人的应对反应:第二部分。解决问题并获得掌控力。
J Fluency Disord. 2009 Jun;34(2):108-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2009.06.003. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
5
Parenting styles and attachment in school-aged children who stutter.口吃学龄儿童的养育方式与依恋关系
J Commun Disord. 2012 Mar-Apr;45(2):98-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.12.002. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
6
The impact of stuttering on adults who stutter and their partners.口吃对成年口吃者及其伴侣的影响。
J Fluency Disord. 2013 Mar;38(1):14-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.12.001. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
7
The Stammering Information Programme: a Delphi study.口吃信息计划:德尔菲研究。
J Fluency Disord. 2011 Sep;36(3):206-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.02.007. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
8
Self-help conferences for people who stutter: a qualitative investigation.口吃者自助会议:一项定性研究。
J Fluency Disord. 2011 Dec;36(4):290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
9
Client perceptions of effective and ineffective therapeutic alliances during treatment for stuttering.患者对言语治疗中有效和无效治疗联盟的看法。
J Fluency Disord. 2010 Dec;35(4):333-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
10
Parents' reactions to children's stuttering and style of coping with stress.父母对孩子口吃的反应及应对压力的方式。
J Fluency Disord. 2016 Sep;49:51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and Sociodemographic Predictors of Parental Perceptions and Confidence in Managing Child Stuttering: a Cross-Sectional Study.父母对儿童口吃管理的认知和信心的临床及社会人口学预测因素:一项横断面研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Dec;76(6):5434-5442. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04998-w. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
2
Parental communication dynamics with children who stutter: A scoping review.父母与口吃儿童的沟通动态:范围综述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jan-Feb;60(1):e13129. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13129. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
3
Effects of behavior inhibition on stuttering severity and adverse consequences of stuttering in 3-6-year-old children who stutter.
行为抑制对 3-6 岁口吃儿童口吃严重程度和口吃不良后果的影响。
J Commun Disord. 2023 Jul-Aug;104:106332. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2023.106332. Epub 2023 May 11.
4
Improving Clinical Competence Through Simulated Training in Evidence-Based Practice for Stuttering: A Pilot Study.通过基于证据的实践模拟训练提高口吃临床能力:一项试点研究。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Nov 16;31(6):2770-2788. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00116. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
5
The influence of active listening on parents' perceptions of clinical empathy in a stuttering assessment: A preliminary study.主动倾听对父母在口吃评估中对临床同理心感知的影响:一项初步研究。
J Commun Disord. 2022 Nov-Dec;100:106274. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106274. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
6
Evaluating Palin Stammering Therapy for School Children (Palin STSC 8-14): protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial comparing Palin STSC(8-14) with usual treatment.评估针对学龄儿童的佩林口吃疗法(佩林STSC 8 - 14):一项将佩林STSC(8 - 14)与常规治疗进行比较的可行性随机对照试验方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Sep 16;8(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01158-1.
7
Selecting Treatments and Monitoring Outcomes: The Circle of Evidence-Based Practice and Client-Centered Care in Treating a Preschool Child Who Stutters.选择治疗方法与监测结果:治疗一名学龄前口吃儿童时基于证据的实践与以客户为中心的护理循环
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018 Jan 9;49(1):13-22. doi: 10.1044/2017_LSHSS-17-0015.