Suppr超能文献

选择治疗方法与监测结果:治疗一名学龄前口吃儿童时基于证据的实践与以客户为中心的护理循环

Selecting Treatments and Monitoring Outcomes: The Circle of Evidence-Based Practice and Client-Centered Care in Treating a Preschool Child Who Stutters.

作者信息

Bernstein Ratner Nan

机构信息

Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park.

出版信息

Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018 Jan 9;49(1):13-22. doi: 10.1044/2017_LSHSS-17-0015.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present clinical forum is to compare how 2 clinicians might select among therapy options for a preschool-aged child who presents with stuttering close to onset.

METHOD

I discuss approaches to full evaluation of the child's profile, advisement of evidence-based practice options open to the family, the need for monitoring of the child's response, and selection of other approaches, if the child appears nonresponsive to the 1st-line approach.

RESULTS

Although some researchers and clinicians appear to favor endorsement of a single recommended treatment for early stuttering, I do not find this approach helpful or consistent with newer mandates for patient-centered care. I am also most comfortable recommending RESTART demands and capacities model as the 1st treatment approach, with parent consent, because its mechanism of action appears transparent and well-documented.

CONCLUSIONS

There are numerous well-supported intervention options for treating preschool children who stutter. No single therapy can possibly work for all clients. I discuss available options that I feel have sufficient evidence-based support for use with young children who stutter. I emphasize the need to consider more, not fewer, acceptable therapy options for children who do not respond positively to a selected treatment approach within a reasonable time frame.

摘要

目的

本次临床论坛的目的是比较两位临床医生如何为一名初发口吃的学龄前儿童选择治疗方案。

方法

我将讨论对儿童情况进行全面评估的方法、向家庭建议基于证据的可行治疗方案、监测儿童反应的必要性,以及如果儿童对一线治疗方法无反应时选择其他方法的问题。

结果

尽管一些研究人员和临床医生似乎倾向于认可一种针对早期口吃的推荐治疗方法,但我认为这种方法并无帮助,也不符合以患者为中心的护理新要求。我也最愿意在获得家长同意的情况下,推荐“重启需求与能力模型”作为首选治疗方法,因为其作用机制似乎清晰且有充分记录。

结论

对于治疗口吃的学龄前儿童,有许多得到充分支持的干预方案。没有一种疗法能适用于所有患者。我将讨论我认为有足够循证支持可用于口吃幼儿的现有方案。我强调,对于在合理时间内对所选治疗方法没有积极反应的儿童,需要考虑更多而非更少的可接受治疗方案。

相似文献

2
Palin Parent-Child Interaction Therapy: The Bigger Picture.佩林父母-儿童互动治疗:更大的图景。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Oct 19;27(3S):1211-1223. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-ODC11-17-0199.
3
Stuttering in Preschool Children: Direct Versus Indirect Treatment.学龄前儿童的口吃:直接治疗与间接治疗
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018 Jan 9;49(1):4-12. doi: 10.1044/2017_LSHSS-17-0066.
4
What Are the Options for the Treatment of Stuttering in Preschool Children?学龄前儿童口吃的治疗方法有哪些?
Semin Speech Lang. 2018 Sep;39(4):313-323. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667160. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
6
Is parent-child interaction therapy effective in reducing stuttering?亲子互动疗法在减少口吃方面有效吗?
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Jun;51(3):636-50. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/046).
9
Decision making in the treatment of school-age children who stutter.口吃学龄儿童的治疗决策
J Commun Disord. 1995 Jun;28(2):107-24. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(95)00005-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Caregiver Predictions of Their 3- to 6-Year-Old Child Who Stutters' Communication Attitude.照顾者对其 3 至 6 岁口吃儿童沟通态度的预测。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Jul 9;67(7):2086-2105. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00662. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
6
Inhibitory Control of Lexical Selection in Adults who Stutter.口吃成人的词汇选择的抑制控制。
J Fluency Disord. 2020 Dec;66:105780. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2020.105780. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
7
Clinical Characteristics Associated With Stuttering Persistence: A Meta-Analysis.与口吃持续相关的临床特征:一项荟萃分析。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Sep 15;63(9):2995-3018. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00096. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

5
Childhood Stuttering: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?儿童口吃:我们现状如何,又将走向何方?
Semin Speech Lang. 2016 Nov;37(4):291-297. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1587703. Epub 2016 Oct 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验