Bernstein Ratner Nan
Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018 Jan 9;49(1):13-22. doi: 10.1044/2017_LSHSS-17-0015.
The purpose of the present clinical forum is to compare how 2 clinicians might select among therapy options for a preschool-aged child who presents with stuttering close to onset.
I discuss approaches to full evaluation of the child's profile, advisement of evidence-based practice options open to the family, the need for monitoring of the child's response, and selection of other approaches, if the child appears nonresponsive to the 1st-line approach.
Although some researchers and clinicians appear to favor endorsement of a single recommended treatment for early stuttering, I do not find this approach helpful or consistent with newer mandates for patient-centered care. I am also most comfortable recommending RESTART demands and capacities model as the 1st treatment approach, with parent consent, because its mechanism of action appears transparent and well-documented.
There are numerous well-supported intervention options for treating preschool children who stutter. No single therapy can possibly work for all clients. I discuss available options that I feel have sufficient evidence-based support for use with young children who stutter. I emphasize the need to consider more, not fewer, acceptable therapy options for children who do not respond positively to a selected treatment approach within a reasonable time frame.
本次临床论坛的目的是比较两位临床医生如何为一名初发口吃的学龄前儿童选择治疗方案。
我将讨论对儿童情况进行全面评估的方法、向家庭建议基于证据的可行治疗方案、监测儿童反应的必要性,以及如果儿童对一线治疗方法无反应时选择其他方法的问题。
尽管一些研究人员和临床医生似乎倾向于认可一种针对早期口吃的推荐治疗方法,但我认为这种方法并无帮助,也不符合以患者为中心的护理新要求。我也最愿意在获得家长同意的情况下,推荐“重启需求与能力模型”作为首选治疗方法,因为其作用机制似乎清晰且有充分记录。
对于治疗口吃的学龄前儿童,有许多得到充分支持的干预方案。没有一种疗法能适用于所有患者。我将讨论我认为有足够循证支持可用于口吃幼儿的现有方案。我强调,对于在合理时间内对所选治疗方法没有积极反应的儿童,需要考虑更多而非更少的可接受治疗方案。