• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

父母对儿童口吃管理的认知和信心的临床及社会人口学预测因素:一项横断面研究

Clinical and Sociodemographic Predictors of Parental Perceptions and Confidence in Managing Child Stuttering: a Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Bafrooei Ebrahim Barzegar, Farazi Morteza, Maroufizadeh Saman, Darouie Akbar

机构信息

Department of Speech Therapy, Pediatric Neurorehabilitation Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Health, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

出版信息

Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Dec;76(6):5434-5442. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04998-w. Epub 2024 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1007/s12070-024-04998-w
PMID:39559008
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11569309/
Abstract

The main aim of the current study was to identify and analyze the most significant clinical and sociodemographic predictors of parents' perceptions regarding their child's stuttering. 139 parents, with at least one child who stutters, completed both the Persian version of the Palin Parent Rating Scale (P-Palin PRS) and a sociodemographic and clinical checklist. To investigate the relationships between scores on the Palin PRS factors and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, we conducted univariable analyses using Pearson correlation coefficients, independent t-tests, and one-way ANOVA. The study analyzed the P-Palin PRS factors: Impact of Stuttering on the Child, Severity of Stuttering and Impact on the Parents, and Parent's Knowledge and Confidence in Managing it. Mean scores were 5.37, 3.87, and 5.42, respectively, with correlations ranging from 0.371 to 0.507. Higher stutter severity negatively correlated with Impact on the Child (=-0.364,  < 0.001). History of speech therapy (ST) failure and family history of speech and language disorders (SLDs) showed lower Impact scores ( = 0.053 and  = 0.057). Severity of Stuttering and Impact on the Parents negatively correlated with stutter severity (=-0.546,  < 0.001) and positively with parents' ages. Parent's Knowledge and Confidence correlated negatively with stutter severity (=-0.242,  = 0.004) and was lower in those with family history of SLDs ( = 0.008). The high stutter severity, ST failure, and family history of SLDs were associated with lower scores across all PRS factors. In conclusion current study identified key predictors influencing parents' perceptions of their child's stuttering, including stutter severity, speech therapy history, and family background.

摘要

本研究的主要目的是识别和分析父母对其孩子口吃认知的最重要临床和社会人口学预测因素。139名至少有一个口吃孩子的父母完成了波斯语版的帕林父母评定量表(P-Palin PRS)以及一份社会人口学和临床检查表。为了研究帕林PRS各因素得分与社会人口学和临床特征之间的关系,我们使用Pearson相关系数、独立样本t检验和单因素方差分析进行了单变量分析。该研究分析了P-Palin PRS的因素:口吃对孩子的影响、口吃严重程度及对父母的影响,以及父母在应对口吃方面的知识和信心。平均得分分别为5.37、3.87和5.42,相关性范围为0.371至0.507。较高的口吃严重程度与对口吃孩子的影响呈负相关(=-0.364,<0.001)。言语治疗(ST)失败史和言语及语言障碍(SLD)家族史的影响得分较低(=0.053和=0.057)。口吃严重程度及对父母的影响与口吃严重程度呈负相关(=-0.546,<0.001),与父母年龄呈正相关。父母的知识和信心与口吃严重程度呈负相关(=-0.242,=0.004),在有SLD家族史的父母中得分较低(=0.008)。较高的口吃严重程度、ST失败和SLD家族史与所有PRS因素得分较低相关。总之,本研究确定了影响父母对孩子口吃认知的关键预测因素,包括口吃严重程度、言语治疗史和家庭背景。

相似文献

1
Clinical and Sociodemographic Predictors of Parental Perceptions and Confidence in Managing Child Stuttering: a Cross-Sectional Study.父母对儿童口吃管理的认知和信心的临床及社会人口学预测因素:一项横断面研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Dec;76(6):5434-5442. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04998-w. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
2
Non-pharmacological interventions for stuttering in children six years and younger.针对 6 岁及以下儿童口吃的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 9;9(9):CD013489. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013489.pub2.
3
Parental perceptions and self-efficacy in managing childhood obesity: a cross-sectional study from Türkiye.父母对儿童肥胖管理的认知与自我效能:来自土耳其的一项横断面研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):477. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05830-2.
4
Understanding the Perspectives of School Children Who Stutter: A Rapid Review.了解口吃学童的观点:快速综述
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70075. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70075.
5
The risks, benefits, and resource implications of different diets in gastrostomy-fed children: The YourTube mixed method study.胃造口喂养儿童不同饮食的风险、益处及资源影响:YouTube混合方法研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(25):1-21. doi: 10.3310/RRREF7741.
6
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
7
Non-pharmacological treatments for stuttering in children and adults: a systematic review and evaluation of clinical effectiveness, and exploration of barriers to successful outcomes.儿童和成人口吃的非药物治疗:临床疗效的系统评价与评估以及成功治疗障碍的探索
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Jan;20(2):1-302, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta20020.
8
The Significance of a Higher Prevalence of ADHD and ADHD Symptoms in Children Who Stutter.口吃儿童中注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)及ADHD症状较高患病率的意义
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2025 Jun 5;68(6):2741-2758. doi: 10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00668. Epub 2025 May 14.
9
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
10
Palin Stuttering Therapy for School aged Children and usual treatment: A randomised controlled trial feasibility study.针对学龄儿童的佩林口吃疗法与常规治疗:一项随机对照试验可行性研究。
J Fluency Disord. 2025 Jun;84:106114. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2025.106114. Epub 2025 Mar 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the Persian Version of the Palin Parent Rating Scales.《帕林家长评定量表》波斯语版本的验证
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2025;77(1):35-43. doi: 10.1159/000539119. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
2
Risk of sleep problems in a clinical sample of children who stutter.口吃儿童临床样本中的睡眠问题风险。
J Fluency Disord. 2024 Mar;79:106036. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2023.106036. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
3
A preliminary investigation of the mental health of parents of young children who stutter.对有口吃儿童的父母心理健康的初步调查。
J Commun Disord. 2023 May-Jun;103:106329. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2023.106329. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
4
Predictive factors for persistence and recovery of stuttering in children: A systematic review.儿童口吃持续存在及恢复的预测因素:一项系统综述。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Aug;23(4):359-371. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2020.1812718. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
5
Caregivers' perceptions of stuttering impact in young children: Agreement in mothers', fathers' and teachers' ratings.照顾者对幼儿口吃影响的看法:母亲、父亲和教师评分的一致性。
J Commun Disord. 2020 Jul-Aug;86:106001. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106001. Epub 2020 May 16.
6
Stuttering Impact: A Shared Perception for Parents and Children?口吃影响:父母和孩子的共同感知?
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2020;72(6):478-486. doi: 10.1159/000504221. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
7
Palin Parent-Child Interaction Therapy: The Bigger Picture.佩林父母-儿童互动治疗:更大的图景。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Oct 19;27(3S):1211-1223. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-ODC11-17-0199.
8
Methods in Stuttering Therapy for Desensitizing Parents of Children Who Stutter.口吃治疗方法:让口吃儿童的父母脱敏。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Oct 19;27(3S):1124-1138. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-ODC11-17-0183.
9
Expressed parental concern regarding childhood stuttering and the Test of Childhood Stuttering.表达了家长对儿童口吃及儿童口吃测试的担忧。
J Commun Disord. 2018 Mar-Apr;72:86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
10
Parents' reactions to children's stuttering and style of coping with stress.父母对孩子口吃的反应及应对压力的方式。
J Fluency Disord. 2016 Sep;49:51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 21.