Vasilakis Ioannis, Solomou Ekaterini, Vitsas Vasilis, Fennema Peter, Korovessis Panagiotis, Siamblis Dimitrios K
Radiology Department, General University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Orthopedics. 2012 Dec;35(12):e1684-91. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20121120-10.
The 2 main null hypotheses of this study were: (1) the 4-year surgical trauma-related degeneration within the hip abductor muscles after a minimally invasive approach to total hip arthroplasty would be similar to that following a conventional approach; and (2) no differences in perioperative blood loss or postoperative hip pain would be observed between the minimally invasive and conventional approaches.In 40 consecutive randomly selected adult patients with unilateral primary hip osteoarthritis, a cementless Zweymüller-Plus THA (Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics, Baar, Switzerland) was implanted by a single surgeon in 1 institution during the same period. Twenty patients underwent a minimally invasive approach (group A), and 20 patients underwent a conventional anterolateral approach (group B). Four years postoperatively, the operated and contralateral nonoperated hips of 37 available patients from both groups were examined with magnetic resonance imaging to show any changes in the gluteus medius and tensor fascia latae. Simultaneously, hip abductor power was measured bilaterally in both groups. Anthropometric data, blood loss, Short Form 36 self-assessment questionnaire, visual analog pain score, and walking distance were also analyzed.The reliability of magnetic resonance imaging and hip abductor power measurements was high. No difference was found in hip abductor power on the operated side between the 2 groups, whereas hip abductor power on the nonoperated side was significantly higher in both groups. This study revealed no mechanical and functional benefits in favor of patients undergoing minimally invasive vs conventional total hip arthroplasty.
本研究的2个主要无效假设为:(1)全髋关节置换术微创入路后髋外展肌内4年与手术创伤相关的退变情况与传统入路后的情况相似;(2)微创入路与传统入路在围手术期失血量或术后髋关节疼痛方面无差异。在40例连续随机选取的单侧原发性髋关节骨关节炎成年患者中,同一名外科医生同期在1家机构为其植入了非骨水泥型Zweymüller-Plus全髋关节假体(瑞士巴尔的施乐辉骨科公司)。20例患者接受微创入路(A组),20例患者接受传统前外侧入路(B组)。术后4年,对两组中37例可获得的患者的手术侧髋关节及对侧未手术髋关节进行磁共振成像检查,以显示臀中肌和阔筋膜张肌的任何变化。同时,双侧测量两组患者的髋外展肌力。还分析了人体测量数据、失血量、简短健康调查问卷36项自我评估问卷、视觉模拟疼痛评分和步行距离。磁共振成像和髋外展肌力测量的可靠性较高。两组手术侧髋外展肌力无差异,而两组未手术侧髋外展肌力均显著较高。本研究表明,与传统全髋关节置换术相比,微创全髋关节置换术对患者并无机械和功能方面的优势。