Post-graduate Program in Dentistry, Dental School, University of Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
Dent Mater. 2013 Feb;29(2):174-80. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.012. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
(1) To measure the marginal and internal adaptation of different prosthetic crowns infrastructures (IS); (2) to analyze two types of methodologies (replica and weight technique) used to evaluate the adaptation of indirect restorations.
Ceramic IS were fabricated using CAD/CAM technology and slip-casting technique, and metal IS were produced by casting (n=10). For each experimental group, the adaptation was evaluated with the replica (RT) and the weight technique (WT), using an impression material (low viscosity silicon) to simulate the luting agent. Cross-sectional images of the silicon replica were obtained and analyzed with Image J software to measure the low viscosity silicon layer thickness at pre-determined points. The silicon layer was also weighted. Results were statistically analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). Pearson correlation was used to analyze the relation between the two types of evaluation methods.
All IS evaluated showed clinically acceptable internal and marginal adaptation. Metal IS showed the best adaptation, irrespective of the measuring technique (RT and WT). The IS produced by CAD-CAM showed greater gap values at the occlusal area than at other evaluated regions. The IS produced by the dental laboratory technician showed similar gap values at all evaluated regions. There is no correlation between RT and WT (p>0.05).
Different levels of adaptation were found for the different experimental groups and for the different evaluation methods. However, all IS evaluated showed clinically acceptable values of marginal and internal adaptation.
(1)测量不同修复体基底结构(IS)的边缘和内部适应性;(2)分析两种用于评估间接修复体适应性的方法(复制技术和称重技术)。
使用 CAD/CAM 技术和石膏铸造技术制作陶瓷 IS,使用铸造方法制作金属 IS(n=10)。对于每个实验组,使用复制技术(RT)和称重技术(WT)评估适应性,使用低粘度硅印模材料模拟黏结剂。用 Image J 软件获取硅复制件的横截面图像,并在预定点分析以测量低粘度硅层的厚度。硅层也进行称重。使用 ANOVA 和 Tukey 检验(α=0.05)对结果进行统计分析。使用皮尔逊相关分析两种评估方法之间的关系。
所有评估的 IS 均显示出临床可接受的内部和边缘适应性。金属 IS 无论采用哪种测量技术(RT 和 WT),均显示出最佳的适应性。通过 CAD/CAM 制作的 IS 在咬合区域的间隙值大于其他评估区域。由牙科技师制作的 IS 在所有评估区域的间隙值相似。RT 和 WT 之间没有相关性(p>0.05)。
不同实验组和不同评估方法的适应性水平不同。然而,所有评估的 IS 均显示出临床可接受的边缘和内部适应性值。