Department of Mental Health, Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí de Sabadell (Barcelona), Institut Universitari Parc Taulí-Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Campus d'Excel·lència Internacional, Bellaterra 08193, Spain.
J Affect Disord. 2013 May;147(1-3):269-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.016. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
To determine the effectiveness over one year of a specific telephone management programme on patients discharged from an emergency department (ED) after a suicide attempt. We hypothesized that the programme will reduce the percentage of patients re-attempting suicide and delay the time between attempts.
A multicentre, case-control, population-based study. The effect of the 1-year intervention on the main outcome measures was evaluated with respect to a 1-year baseline period and a control group.
Two hospitals with distinct catchment areas in Catalonia (Spain).
A total of 991 patients discharged from the ED of either hospital after a suicide attempt during the baseline year and the intervention year.
The intervention was carried out on patients discharged from the ED for attempted suicide (Sabadell). It consisted of a systematic, one-year telephone follow-up programme: after 1 week, thereafter at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12-month intervals, to assess the risk of suicide and increasing adherence to treatment. The population in the control group (Terrassa) received treatment as usual after discharge, without additional telephone management.
Time elapsed between initial suicide attempt and subsequent one, and changes in the annual rate of patients who reattempted suicide in the year of the intervention and the preceding one.
The telephone management programme delayed suicide reattempts in the intervention group compared to the baseline year (mean time in days to first reattempt, year 2008=346.47, sd=4.65; mean time in days to first reattempt, year 2007=316.46, sd=7.18; P<0.0005; χ²=12.1, df=1) and compared to the control population during the same period (mean time in days to first reattempt, treatment period=346.47, sd=4.65; mean time in days to first reattempt, pre-treatment period=300.36, sd=10.67; P<0.0005; χ²=16.8, df=1). The intervention reduced the rate of patients who reattempted suicide in the experimental population compared to the previous year (Intervention 6% (16/296) v Baseline 14% (39/285) difference 8%, 95% confidence interval 2% to 12%) and to the control population (Intervention 6% (16/296) v Control 14% (31/218) difference 8%, -13% to -2%)
One of the main obstacles was the difficulty to contact all patients within the established deadlines. Another limitation of our study was that patients under the age of 18 underwent an intensive intervention in the day hospital, although their number was very small (13/319 in 2008) and did not significantly influence the results. But the main limitation of our study was that it was performed within the EAAD project. This project includes a comprehensive multilevel intervention practically in the same experimental area and aimed at an early diagnosis and treatment of depression, which is the main psychiatric disorder associated with suicide. Moreover, longer-term studies should be encouraged to determine whether such interventions really reduce suicide
A telephone management programme for patients discharged from an ED after a suicide attempted would be a useful strategy in delaying further suicide attempts and in reducing the rate of reattempts, which is known as the highest risk factor for suicide completion.
确定对急诊科出院后自杀未遂患者进行为期一年的特定电话管理计划的有效性。我们假设该计划将降低患者再次自杀的比例,并延迟自杀尝试之间的时间。
一项多中心、病例对照、基于人群的研究。使用一年的基线期和对照组来评估 1 年干预对主要结局测量的影响。
西班牙加泰罗尼亚两个具有不同集水区的医院。
在基线年和干预年期间,共有 991 名从任何一家医院急诊科出院的自杀未遂患者。
对因自杀企图而从 ED 出院的患者(萨瓦德尔)进行了系统的、为期一年的电话随访计划:在第 1 周后,此后在 1、3、6、9 和 12 个月的间隔进行评估,以评估自杀风险和增加治疗依从性。对照组(特拉萨斯)的人群在出院后接受常规治疗,没有额外的电话管理。
首次自杀尝试和随后尝试之间的时间流逝,以及干预年和前一年尝试自杀的患者的年度再尝试率的变化。
与基线年相比(2008 年首次尝试重新尝试的平均天数=346.47,sd=4.65;2007 年首次尝试重新尝试的平均天数=316.46,sd=7.18;P<0.0005;χ²=12.1,df=1),电话管理计划延迟了干预组的自杀再尝试,并且与同期对照组相比(治疗期首次尝试重新尝试的平均天数=346.47,sd=4.65;治疗前首次尝试重新尝试的平均天数=300.36,sd=10.67;P<0.0005;χ²=16.8,df=1)。与前一年相比,干预组尝试自杀的患者比例降低(干预 6%(16/296)与基线 14%(39/285)差异 8%,95%置信区间 2%至 12%)和对照组(干预 6%(16/296)与对照 14%(31/218)差异 8%,-13%至-2%)。
主要障碍之一是在既定截止日期内难以联系所有患者。我们研究的另一个限制是,18 岁以下的患者在日间医院接受了强化干预,尽管他们的人数非常少(2008 年为 13/319),但并没有显著影响结果。但我们研究的主要限制是它是在 EAAD 项目内进行的。该项目包括在同一个实验区域内实施全面的多层次干预措施,旨在早期诊断和治疗抑郁症,这是与自杀相关的主要精神疾病。此外,应鼓励进行更长期的研究,以确定此类干预措施是否真的能降低自杀率。
对急诊科出院后自杀未遂患者进行电话管理计划将是延迟进一步自杀尝试和降低再尝试率的有效策略,因为再尝试率是自杀完成的最高风险因素。