Menard M-L, Yagoubi F, Drici M, Lavrut T, Askenazy F
Service universitaire de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent, hôpitaux pédiatriques de Nice, CHU Lenval, 57, avenue de la Californie, 06200 Nice, France.
Encephale. 2013 May;39 Suppl 1:S29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.08.007. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
The aim of this paper is to underline the need of a systematic monitoring (1) of atypical antipsychotics and (2) of catatonic symptoms in child psychiatry. We present in this paper the clinical history of a 16-year-old adolescent inpatient needing a prescription of atypical antipsychotic drug. We present the most relevant results of our clinical monitoring over 7 months.
A 16-year-old Caucasian male adolescent, by the name of Paul, was admitted in August 2009 to an Adolescent University Psychiatry Unit for an acute psychotic disorder. On admission, he presented paranoid delusion, auditory hallucinations and impulsive movements. The score on the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) was 17 (the threshold score for the diagnosis of catatonic symptoms is 2). Laboratory tests showed the lack of blood toxic levels, creatine phosphokinase (CPK) level was 684 IU/L. Paul was treated with clonazepam (0.05 mg/kg/d). This particular day was considered to be day #1 of the clinical drug monitoring. Immediately after, regular follow-up of catatonic symptoms was performed. On day #15, the CPK level returned to normal with improvement of clinical catatonia but with still a score of 4 on the BFCRS scale. Auditory hallucinations and delusion persisted. Risperidone treatment was begun (1mg/d and 1.5mg/d after 24 hours), associated with oral clonazepam (0.05 mg/kg/d). On day #17, after 48 hours of improvement of delusion, the catatonic symptoms rapidly worsened. Risperidone was stopped; Paul was transferred to intensive care where he was treated with clonazepam IV (0.1mg/kg/d). The score on BFCRS scale was 20, Paul presented no fever and the CPK level was below 170 IU/L. The diagnosis was a relapse of the catatonic episode, which was caused by the administration of risperidone. On day #24, no improvement in the state of catatonia was obtained. The treatment was changed with the following combination of medicine: clonazepam (0.1mg/kg/d)-lorazepam (5mg/d)-carbamazepine (10mg/kg/d). With this combination, the state of catatonia improved quickly and on day #31, he was transferred to the adolescent psychiatry unit. However, delusion and hallucinations persisted; a treatment with olanzapine was started at 5mg/d and then progressively increased to 20mg/d for 10 days. On day #115, after 3 months with olanzapine, no improvement of the hallucinatory and delusional symptoms was observed; the diagnosis of early-onset refractory schizophrenia was established. The Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) confirmed the good compliance; clozapine was introduced and progressively increased up to 250 mg/d. On day #199, after 3 months under clozapine (250 mg/d), the speech was coherent and delusion was rare. During this period, no relapse of the catatonic state was observed.
In this case, the BFCRS scale was sensitive to catatonic symptom diagnosis. CPK levels vary differently for each atypical antipsychotic and are not a specific complication indicator. In complex cases, the TDM seems useful when choosing atypical antipsychotics.
The association of two benzodiazepines (clonazepam-lorazepam) with carbamazepin allowed the improvement of catatonic symptoms. Plasma levels of atypical antipsychotics helped the practitioner in deciding the type of care required: plasma levels confirmed the patient's treatment adherence and thus reinforced the choice of clozapine.
本文旨在强调在儿童精神病学中对非典型抗精神病药物及紧张症症状进行系统监测的必要性。我们在本文中呈现了一名16岁青少年住院患者的临床病史,该患者需要开具非典型抗精神病药物处方。我们展示了7个月临床监测的最相关结果。
一名16岁的白种男性青少年,名叫保罗,于2009年8月因急性精神障碍入住一所大学青少年精神病科病房。入院时,他有偏执妄想、幻听和冲动行为。布什-弗朗西斯紧张症评定量表(BFCRS)得分是17分(诊断紧张症症状的阈值分数是2分)。实验室检查显示血液中无中毒水平,肌酸磷酸激酶(CPK)水平为684国际单位/升。保罗接受氯硝西泮治疗(0.05毫克/千克/天)。这一天被视为临床药物监测的第#1天。此后,立即对紧张症症状进行定期随访。在第#15天,CPK水平恢复正常,临床紧张症有所改善,但BFCRS量表得分仍为4分。幻听和妄想持续存在。开始使用利培酮治疗(第1天1毫克/天,24小时后1.5毫克/天),联合口服氯硝西泮(0.05毫克/千克/天)。在第#17天,妄想改善48小时后,紧张症症状迅速恶化。停用利培酮;保罗被转至重症监护室,在那里接受静脉注射氯硝西泮治疗(0.1毫克/千克/天)。BFCRS量表得分是20分,保罗没有发烧,CPK水平低于170国际单位/升。诊断为紧张症发作复发,由使用利培酮引起。在第#24天,紧张症状态没有改善。治疗方案改为以下药物组合:氯硝西泮(0.1毫克/千克/天)-劳拉西泮(5毫克/天)-卡马西平(10毫克/千克/天)。使用该组合后,紧张症状态迅速改善,在第#31天,他被转至青少年精神病科病房。然而,妄想和幻听仍然存在;开始使用奥氮平治疗,起始剂量为5毫克/天,然后在10天内逐渐增加至20毫克/天。在第#115天,使用奥氮平3个月后,幻觉和妄想症状没有改善;确诊为早发性难治性精神分裂症。治疗药物监测(TDM)证实患者依从性良好;开始使用氯氮平并逐渐增加剂量至250毫克/天。在第#199天,使用氯氮平(250毫克/天)3个月后,言语连贯,妄想少见。在此期间,未观察到紧张症状态复发。
在本病例中,BFCRS量表对紧张症症状诊断敏感。每种非典型抗精神病药物的CPK水平变化不同,且不是特定的并发症指标。在复杂病例中,TDM在选择非典型抗精神病药物时似乎有用。
两种苯二氮䓬类药物(氯硝西泮-劳拉西泮)与卡马西平联合使用可改善紧张症症状。非典型抗精神病药物的血药浓度有助于医生确定所需的治疗类型:血药浓度证实了患者对治疗的依从性,从而加强了使用氯氮平的选择。