• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期照护居民的姑息治疗:对临床结局的影响。

Palliative care for long-term care residents: effect on clinical outcomes.

机构信息

Address correspondence to Jody Comart, Palliative Care, Hebrew Rehabilitation Center, 1200 Centre St., Boston, MA 02131. E-mail:

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2013 Oct;53(5):874-80. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns154. Epub 2012 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1093/geront/gns154
PMID:23220397
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether a palliative care (PC) consult service in a long-term care (LTC) facility would result in a more favorable course of treatment and clinical outcomes for participating residents.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We used a historical control design within a single LTC facility. Outcome data and potential confounding variables were obtained using the Minimum Data Set. (Health Care Financing Administration. (1995). Long term care resident assessment instrument user's manual version 2.0. Rockville, MD: Health Care Financing Administration.) Residents who died during the period of the PC service (2007-2009) were compared with matched residents who died in the year prior (2006, historical controls). The analysis sample included 250 residents (125 PC residents, 125 non-PC historical control residents). Our main analysis focused on a composite outcome based on utilization patterns, depression, and pain and other clinical indicators. We analyzed change on this component score (and the individual outcomes) over a 1-year period.

RESULTS

PC residents experienced a significant reduction in emergency room (ER) visits (p < .001) and depression (p = .031). Change in the composite score indicated a significant difference over time between the 2 groups (p = .013).

IMPLICATIONS

Although limited to 1 facility and drawn from a quasi-experimental design, the results demonstrate the potential for improved quality of care with PC consults. The PC team was effective in reducing ER visits and depression and promoted more appropriate care resulting in more favorable clinical outcomes toward the resident's end of life.

摘要

目的

确定长期护理(LTC)机构中的姑息治疗(PC)咨询服务是否会导致参与居民的治疗过程和临床结果更加有利。

设计和方法

我们在单个 LTC 机构内使用了历史对照设计。使用最低数据集(医疗保健融资管理局。(1995 年)。长期护理居民评估工具用户手册版本 2.0. 罗克维尔,MD:医疗保健融资管理局。)获得了结果数据和潜在的混杂变量。在 PC 服务期间(2007-2009 年)死亡的居民与同年(2006 年,历史对照)死亡的匹配居民进行了比较。分析样本包括 250 名居民(125 名 PC 居民,125 名非 PC 历史对照居民)。我们的主要分析集中在基于利用模式、抑郁和疼痛以及其他临床指标的综合结果上。我们分析了 1 年内该综合评分(和个别结果)的变化。

结果

PC 居民急诊室(ER)就诊次数显著减少(p <.001),抑郁发生率降低(p =.031)。两组之间在复合评分上的变化随时间显著不同(p =.013)。

意义

尽管仅限于 1 个机构,并且来自准实验设计,但结果表明 PC 咨询可能会提高护理质量。PC 团队在减少急诊室就诊和抑郁方面非常有效,并促进了更适当的护理,从而使居民临终时的临床结果更加有利。

相似文献

1
Palliative care for long-term care residents: effect on clinical outcomes.长期照护居民的姑息治疗:对临床结局的影响。
Gerontologist. 2013 Oct;53(5):874-80. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns154. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
2
Does using the interRAI Palliative Care instrument reduce the needs and symptoms of nursing home residents receiving palliative care?使用 interRAI 姑息治疗工具是否能减少接受姑息治疗的养老院居民的需求和症状?
Palliat Support Care. 2018 Feb;16(1):32-40. doi: 10.1017/S1478951517000153. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
3
Palliative Care Consults in U.S. Nursing Homes: Not Just for the Dying.美国养老院的姑息治疗咨询:不只是为临终患者。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;21(2):188-193. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0099. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
4
When do people with dementia die peacefully? An analysis of data collected prospectively in long-term care settings.痴呆症患者何时能安详离世?对长期护理机构前瞻性收集数据的分析。
Palliat Med. 2014 Mar;28(3):210-9. doi: 10.1177/0269216313509128. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
5
Perceptions of spirituality and spiritual care among older nursing home residents at the end of life.临终时老年疗养院居民对灵性和灵性关怀的认知
Holist Nurs Pract. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(6):285-9; quiz 290-1. doi: 10.1097/01.HNP.0000298611.02352.46.
6
Rural/urban differences in health care utilization and place of death for persons with respiratory illness in the last year of life.生命最后一年中呼吸系统疾病患者在医疗保健利用和死亡地点方面的城乡差异。
Rural Remote Health. 2010 Apr-Jun;10(2):1349. Epub 2010 Apr 30.
7
Symptom experience of dying long-term care residents.长期护理机构中临终居民的症状体验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Jan;56(1):91-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01388.x. Epub 2007 Aug 28.
8
Physician Visits and Recognition of Residents' Terminal Phase in Long-Term Care Facilities: Findings From the PACE Cross-Sectional Study in 6 EU Countries.长期护理机构中医生访视和识别居民终末期的情况:来自 6 个欧盟国家 PACE 横断面研究的结果。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Jun;20(6):696-702.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.08.015. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
9
The Palliative Care in Assisted Living (PCAL) pilot study: successes, shortfalls, and methodological implications.辅助生活中的姑息治疗(PCAL)试点研究:成功之处、不足之处及方法学意义。
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jan;62(1):199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.05.010. Epub 2005 Jun 28.
10
Quality of care in Icelandic nursing homes measured with Minimum Data Set quality indicators: retrospective analysis of nursing home data over 7 years.冰岛养老院的护理质量用最低数据集质量指标衡量:7 年来养老院数据的回顾性分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Nov;49(11):1342-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Palliative care consultation teams in long-term care: a descriptive retrospective cohort study.长期护理中的姑息治疗咨询团队:一项描述性回顾性队列研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Mar 22;24(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01716-3.
2
Identifying unmet palliative care needs of nursing home residents: A scoping review.识别养老院居民未满足的姑息治疗需求:一项范围综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 25;20(2):e0319403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319403. eCollection 2025.
3
Association Between Modifiable Structural and Process Factors and the Quality Indicator Pain in Nursing Home Residents: A MultiCentre Cross-Sectional Survey.
可改变的结构和过程因素与养老院居民疼痛质量指标之间的关联:一项多中心横断面调查
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Jul;81(7):3879-3893. doi: 10.1111/jan.16567. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
4
The effect of combined training (theoretical-practical) of palliative care on perceived self-efficacy of nursing students.姑息治疗(理论-实践)联合培训对护理学生感知自我效能的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0302938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302938. eCollection 2024.
5
Measuring Potentially Avoidable Acute Care Transfers From Long-Term Care Homes in Quebec: a Cross Sectional Study.衡量魁北克长期护理机构中潜在可避免的急性护理转移:一项横断面研究。
Can Geriatr J. 2023 Sep 1;26(3):339-349. doi: 10.5770/cgj.26.620. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Academic-Clinical Collaborations to Build Undergraduate Nursing Education in Hospice and Palliative Care.学术-临床合作,构建临终关怀本科护理教育。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2023 Jun;49(6):13-18. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20230515-01. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
7
High-Quality Nursing Home and Palliative Care-One and the Same.高质量的养老院和姑息治疗——殊途同归。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Feb;23(2):247-252. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.11.027. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
8
A Systematic Review of Nursing Home Palliative Care Interventions: Characteristics and Outcomes.疗养院姑息治疗干预措施的系统评价:特征与结果
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 May;21(5):583-596.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.11.015. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
9
Conceptualizing and Counting Discretionary Utilization in the Final 100 Days of Life: A Scoping Review.临终前100天内自由裁量医疗利用的概念化与计数:一项范围综述
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Apr;59(4):894-915.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.10.009. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
10
Palliative Care Consults in U.S. Nursing Homes: Not Just for the Dying.美国养老院的姑息治疗咨询:不只是为临终患者。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;21(2):188-193. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0099. Epub 2017 Aug 17.