Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VAMC, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Leonard Davis Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Feb;23(2):247-252. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.11.027. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
Many individuals receiving post-acute and long-term care services in nursing homes have unmet palliative and end-of-life care needs. Hospice has been the predominant approach to meeting these needs, although hospice services generally are available only to long-term care residents with a limited prognosis who choose to forego disease-modifying or curative therapies. Two additional approaches to meeting these needs are the provision of palliative care consultation through community- or hospital-based programs and facility-based palliative care services. However, access to this specialized care is limited, services are not clearly defined, and the empirical evidence of these approaches' effectiveness is inadequate. In this article, we review the existing evidence and challenges with each of these 3 approaches. We then describe a model for effective delivery of palliative and end-of-life care in nursing homes, one in which palliative and end-of-life care are seen as integral to high-quality nursing home care. To achieve this vision, we make 4 recommendations: (1) promote internal palliative and end-of-life care capacity through comprehensive training and support; (2) ensure that state and federal payment policies and regulations do not create barriers to delivering high-quality, person-centered palliative and end-of-life care; (3) align nursing home quality measures to include palliative and end-of-life care-sensitive indicators; and (4) support access to and integration of external palliative care services. These recommendations will require changes in the organization, delivery, and reimbursement of care. All nursing homes should provide high-quality palliative and end-of-life care, and this article describes some key strategies to make this goal a reality.
许多在养老院接受康复和长期护理服务的人都有未满足的姑息治疗和临终关怀需求。缓和医疗一直是满足这些需求的主要方法,尽管缓和医疗服务通常只提供给有有限预后且选择放弃疾病治疗或治愈性治疗的长期护理居民。满足这些需求的另外两种方法是通过社区或医院为基础的项目和机构为基础的姑息治疗服务提供姑息治疗咨询。然而,这种专门护理的获得受到限制,服务没有明确定义,这些方法的有效性的实证证据也不足。在本文中,我们回顾了这 3 种方法的现有证据和挑战。然后,我们描述了一种在养老院有效提供姑息治疗和临终关怀的模式,即将姑息治疗和临终关怀视为高质量养老院护理的组成部分。为了实现这一愿景,我们提出了 4 项建议:(1)通过全面的培训和支持来促进内部姑息治疗和临终关怀能力;(2)确保州和联邦的支付政策和法规不会为提供高质量、以患者为中心的姑息治疗和临终关怀制造障碍;(3)调整养老院质量措施,纳入姑息治疗和临终关怀敏感指标;(4)支持外部姑息治疗服务的获得和整合。这些建议将需要在护理的组织、提供和报销方面做出改变。所有养老院都应该提供高质量的姑息治疗和临终关怀,本文描述了实现这一目标的一些关键策略。