• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估预防效果的事件延迟作为附加临床试验结局指标的建议。

A proposal for an additional clinical trial outcome measure assessing preventive effect as delay of events.

机构信息

Department of Medical Sciences, Entrance 40, 5th Floor, Uppsala University Hospital, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;27(12):903-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-012-9752-0. Epub 2012 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1007/s10654-012-9752-0
PMID:23224516
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3539066/
Abstract

Many effect measures used in clinical trials are problematic because they are differentially understood by patients and physicians. The emergence of novel methods such as accelerated failure-time models and quantile regression has shifted the focus of effect measurement from probability measures to time-to-event measures. Such modeling techniques are rapidly evolving, but matching non-parametric descriptive measures are lacking. We propose such a measure, the delay of events, demonstrating treatment effect as a gain in event-free time. We believe this measure to be of value for shared clinical decision-making. The rationale behind the measure is given, and it is conceptually explained using the Kaplan-Meier estimate and the quantile regression framework. A formula for calculation of the delay of events is given. Hypothetical and empirical examples are used to demonstrate the measure. The measure is discussed in relation to other measures highlighting the time effects of preventive treatments. There is a need to further investigate the properties of the measure as well as its role in clinical decision-making.

摘要

许多在临床试验中使用的效应度量方法存在问题,因为它们在患者和医生之间的理解存在差异。新型方法的出现,如加速失效时间模型和分位数回归,已经将效应度量的重点从概率度量转移到了事件时间度量。这些建模技术正在迅速发展,但缺乏匹配的非参数描述性度量。我们提出了一种这样的度量方法,即事件延迟,将治疗效果表示为无事件时间的增加。我们相信,这种度量方法对于共同的临床决策具有价值。本文给出了该度量方法的原理,并使用 Kaplan-Meier 估计和分位数回归框架从概念上进行了解释。给出了计算事件延迟的公式。使用假设和实证示例来说明该度量方法。该度量方法与其他度量方法进行了讨论,突出了预防性治疗的时间效应。需要进一步研究该度量方法的性质及其在临床决策中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1017/3539066/455f39f157c7/10654_2012_9752_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1017/3539066/25cb044e765b/10654_2012_9752_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1017/3539066/16aa0e9d2a61/10654_2012_9752_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1017/3539066/dd43b17369a0/10654_2012_9752_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1017/3539066/455f39f157c7/10654_2012_9752_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1017/3539066/25cb044e765b/10654_2012_9752_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1017/3539066/16aa0e9d2a61/10654_2012_9752_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1017/3539066/dd43b17369a0/10654_2012_9752_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1017/3539066/455f39f157c7/10654_2012_9752_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A proposal for an additional clinical trial outcome measure assessing preventive effect as delay of events.评估预防效果的事件延迟作为附加临床试验结局指标的建议。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;27(12):903-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-012-9752-0. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Overview of the epidemiology methods and applications: strengths and limitations of observational study designs.流行病学方法与应用概述:观察性研究设计的优势与局限性。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2010;50 Suppl 1(s1):10-2. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2010.526838.
4
Augmenting the logrank test in the design of clinical trials in which non-proportional hazards of the treatment effect may be anticipated.在可能预期治疗效果存在非比例风险的临床试验设计中增强对数秩检验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Feb 11;16:16. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0110-x.
5
Bias and precision of methods for estimating the difference in restricted mean survival time from an individual patient data meta-analysis.个体患者数据荟萃分析中估计受限平均生存时间差异的方法的偏倚和精度。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Mar 29;16:37. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0137-z.
6
Empirical power comparison of statistical tests in contemporary phase III randomized controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes in oncology.肿瘤学中以时间为事件的当代 III 期随机对照试验中统计检验的经验功效比较。
Clin Trials. 2020 Dec;17(6):597-606. doi: 10.1177/1740774520940256. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
7
Are non-constant rates and non-proportional treatment effects accounted for in the design and analysis of randomised controlled trials? A review of current practice.随机对照试验的设计和分析中是否考虑了非恒定率和非比例治疗效果?对当前实践的回顾。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 May 16;19(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0749-1.
8
Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中动脉内脑溶栓的试验设计与报告标准。
Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):e109-37. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09. Epub 2003 Jul 17.
9
A novel method for interpreting survival analysis data: description and test on three major clinical trials on cardiovascular prevention.一种解释生存分析数据的新方法:在三项心血管预防临床试验上的描述和检验。
Trials. 2020 Jun 26;21(1):578. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04511-y.
10
The use of continuous data versus binary data in MTC models: a case study in rheumatoid arthritis.在 MTC 模型中使用连续数据与二进制数据:以类风湿性关节炎为例。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Nov 6;12:167. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-167.

引用本文的文献

1
Time Gained to Cardiovascular Disease by Intensive Lipid-Lowering Therapy: Results of Individual Placebo-Controlled Trials and Pooled Effects.降脂治疗获得的心血管获益时间:来自个体化安慰剂对照试验和汇总效应的结果。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2024 Nov;24(6):743-752. doi: 10.1007/s40256-024-00668-y. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
2
Adherence to the Atrial Fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway and the risk of major outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: A post-hoc analysis from the prospective GLORIA-AF Registry.房颤患者遵循房颤更佳治疗(ABC)路径与主要结局风险:来自前瞻性GLORIA-AF注册研究的事后分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Nov 24;55:101757. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101757. eCollection 2023 Jan.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Helping Doctors and Patients Make Sense of Health Statistics.帮助医生和患者理解健康统计数据。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2007 Nov;8(2):53-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2008.00033.x. Epub 2007 Nov 1.
2
Memantine for dementia in adults older than 40 years with Down's syndrome (MEADOWS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.美金刚治疗 40 岁以上唐氏综合征成人痴呆症(MEADOWS):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet. 2012 Feb 11;379(9815):528-36. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61676-0. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
3
Evidence that obesity risk factor potencies are weight dependent, a phenomenon that may explain accelerated weight gain in western societies.
Clinical complexity and impact of the ABC (Atrial fibrillation Better Care) pathway in patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the ESC-EHRA EURObservational Research Programme in AF General Long-Term Registry.
房颤患者 ABC(房颤更好护理)路径的临床复杂性和影响:来自 ESC-EHRA EURObservational Research Programme in AF 一般长期注册研究的报告。
BMC Med. 2022 Sep 2;20(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02526-7.
4
A novel method for interpreting survival analysis data: description and test on three major clinical trials on cardiovascular prevention.一种解释生存分析数据的新方法:在三项心血管预防临床试验上的描述和检验。
Trials. 2020 Jun 26;21(1):578. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04511-y.
5
Postponement of Death by Statin Use: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.他汀类药物使用对死亡的推迟作用:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):1607-1614. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05024-4. Epub 2019 May 9.
6
Length of time periods in treatment effect descriptions and willingness to initiate preventive therapy: a randomised survey experiment.治疗效果描述中时间段的长度和预防性治疗的意愿:一项随机调查实验。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0662-2.
7
Time-based measures of treatment effect: reassessment of ticagrelor and clopidogrel from the PLATO trial.基于时间的治疗效果测量:来自PLATO试验的替卡格雷和氯吡格雷的重新评估
Open Heart. 2017 Jun 1;4(2):e000557. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000557. eCollection 2017.
8
The Rotterdam Study: 2014 objectives and design update.《鹿特丹研究:2014 年目标与设计更新》
Eur J Epidemiol. 2013 Nov;28(11):889-926. doi: 10.1007/s10654-013-9866-z. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
肥胖风险因素效力与体重有关的证据,这一现象可能解释了西方社会体重加速增加的原因。
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027657. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
4
Exploratory quantile regression with many covariates: an application to adverse birth outcomes.带有许多协变量的探索性分位数回归:在不良出生结局中的应用。
Epidemiology. 2011 Nov;22(6):859-66. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31822908b3.
5
A Class of Transformed Mean Residual Life Models With Censored Survival Data.一类带有删失生存数据的变换平均剩余寿命模型。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2009 Jun 1;104(486):803-815. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2009.0130.
6
The effect of alternative summary statistics for communicating risk reduction on decisions about taking statins: a randomized trial.用于传达风险降低信息的替代汇总统计量对他汀类药物使用决策的影响:一项随机试验。
PLoS Med. 2009 Aug;6(8):e1000134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000134. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
7
Estimating cumulative treatment effects in the presence of nonproportional hazards.在存在非比例风险的情况下估计累积治疗效果。
Biometrics. 2008 Sep;64(3):724-732. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00947.x. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
8
Can postponement of an adverse outcome be used to present risk reductions to a lay audience? A population survey.能否通过推迟不良后果的发生来向普通民众说明风险降低情况?一项人口调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007 Mar 29;7:8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-7-8.
9
Number needed to treat: easily understood and intuitively meaningful? Theoretical considerations and a randomized trial.需治疗人数:易于理解且直观有意义?理论思考与一项随机试验。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Sep;55(9):888-92. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00432-8.
10
Primary prevention drug therapy: can it meet patients' requirements for reduced risk?一级预防药物治疗:它能满足患者降低风险的需求吗?
Med Decis Making. 2002 Jul-Aug;22(4):326-39. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0202200411.