Bellavia Andrea, Wallentin Lars, Orsini Nicola, James Stefan K, Cannon Christopher P, Himmelmann Anders, Sundström Johan, Renlund Henrik, Lytsy Per
Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Open Heart. 2017 Jun 1;4(2):e000557. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000557. eCollection 2017.
Treatment effects to binary endpoints using time-to-event data in randomised controlled trials are typically summarised by reporting HRs derived with Cox proportional hazard models. Alternative and complementary methods include summarising the between-treatment differences on the metric time scale, quantifying the effect as delay of the event (DoE). The aim of this study was to reassess data from the PLATO study expressing the effects as the time by which the main outcomes are delayed or hastened due to treatment.
PLATO was a randomised controlled double-blind multicentre study (n=18,624), conducted between 2006 and 2008, which demonstrated superiority of the antiplatelet treatment ticagrelor over clopidogrel in reducing risk of several cardiovascular events. In the present study, four of the main PLATO outcomes were reassessed by calculating the time by which an event may be delayed due to the treatment.
The effects of ticagrelor, as compared with clopidogrel, consisted of a substantial delay of the evaluated outcomes, ranging from 83 to 98 days over 400-day follow-up. The Delay of Events Curves showed that the effects progressively increased over time, and the significant findings were concordant with those presented in the original PLATO study.
This study confirmed evidence of a beneficial effect of ticagrelor over clopidogrel, and provided the magnitude of such effects in terms of delayed event time. Investigating time-to-event data with a percentile approach allows presenting treatment effects from randomised controlled studies as absolute measures of the time by which an event may be delayed due to the treatment.
PLATO (www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00391872); Results.
在随机对照试验中,使用事件发生时间数据对二元终点的治疗效果通常通过报告用Cox比例风险模型得出的风险比(HRs)来总结。其他补充方法包括在度量时间尺度上总结治疗组间差异,将效果量化为事件延迟(DoE)。本研究的目的是重新评估来自PLATO研究的数据,将效果表示为由于治疗导致主要结局延迟或提前的时间。
PLATO是一项随机对照双盲多中心研究(n = 18,624),于2006年至2008年进行,该研究证明抗血小板治疗替格瑞洛在降低多种心血管事件风险方面优于氯吡格雷。在本研究中,通过计算由于治疗可能导致事件延迟的时间,对PLATO的四个主要结局进行了重新评估。
与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛的效果包括评估结局的显著延迟,在400天的随访中延迟时间为83至98天。事件延迟曲线显示效果随时间逐渐增加,显著结果与原始PLATO研究中呈现的结果一致。
本研究证实了替格瑞洛优于氯吡格雷的有益效果证据,并以事件延迟时间的形式提供了此类效果的大小。用百分位数方法研究事件发生时间数据,可以将随机对照研究的治疗效果表示为由于治疗导致事件可能延迟的时间的绝对度量。