Suppr超能文献

前瞻性记忆提取中的差异加搜索过程。

Discrepancy-plus-search processes in prospective memory retrieval.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1125, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2013 Apr;41(3):443-51. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0273-6.

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated the processes underlying prospective memory (PM) retrieval, focusing specifically on two possible spontaneous processes: discrepancy-plus-search and familiarity. Discrepancy was elicited by orthogonally manipulating the processing difficulties of the PM targets and the nontargets. Participants performed a PM task while solving anagrams with two levels of difficulty (easy or difficult). Assuming that the ease of processing easy anagrams would heighten a sense of familiarity, the familiarity view predicted better PM performance with easy anagrams as the PM targets. In contrast, the discrepancy-plus-search view predicted higher PM performance for the PM targets that were anagrams whose difficulty level mismatched that of the surrounding nontargets, as compared to PM targets whose difficulty matched that of the surrounding nontargets. This prediction was based on the idea that mismatching rather than matching difficulty levels would create discrepancy, thereby signaling significance for the target. Participants were more likely to perform the PM task for PM targets that were discrepant, supporting the discrepancy-plus-search view.

摘要

在本研究中,我们调查了前瞻性记忆(PM)检索的过程,特别关注两种可能的自发过程:差异加搜索和熟悉度。差异是通过正交操纵 PM 目标和非目标的处理难度来引发的。参与者在解决字谜游戏时执行 PM 任务,字谜游戏有两个难度级别(简单或困难)。假设处理简单字谜的容易程度会增强熟悉感,因此熟悉度观点预测在 PM 目标是简单字谜时会有更好的 PM 表现。相比之下,差异加搜索观点预测在 PM 目标是与周围非目标的难度级别不匹配的字谜时,PM 表现会更高,而在 PM 目标是与周围非目标的难度级别匹配的字谜时则表现不佳。这种预测是基于这样一种观点,即不匹配而不是匹配难度级别会产生差异,从而为目标信号表示重要性。参与者更有可能为差异较大的 PM 目标执行 PM 任务,这支持了差异加搜索观点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验