• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口腔解剖学实验室考试在物理治疗项目中。

Oral anatomy laboratory examinations in a physical therapy program.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Mercer University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, USA.

出版信息

Anat Sci Educ. 2013 Jul-Aug;6(4):271-6. doi: 10.1002/ase.1339. Epub 2012 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1002/ase.1339
PMID:23225627
Abstract

The process of creating and administering traditional tagged anatomy laboratory examinations is time consuming for instructors and limits laboratory access for students. Depending on class size and the number of class, sections, creating, administering, and breaking down a tagged laboratory examination may involve one to two eight-hour days. During the time that a tagged examination is being created, student productivity may be reduced as the anatomy laboratory is inaccessible to students. Further, the type of questions that can be asked in a tagged laboratory examination may limit student assessment to lower level cognitive abilities and may limit the instructors' ability to assess the students' understanding of anatomical and clinical concepts. Anatomy is a foundational science in the Physical Therapy curriculum and a thorough understanding of anatomy is necessary to progress through the subsequent clinical courses. Physical therapy curricula have evolved to reflect the changing role of physical therapists to primary caregivers by introducing a greater scope of clinical courses earlier in the curriculum. Physical therapy students must have a thorough understanding of clinical anatomy early in the education process. However, traditional anatomy examination methods may not be reflective of the clinical thought processes required of physical therapy students. Traditional laboratory examination methods also reduce student productivity by limiting access during examination set-up and breakdown. To provide a greater complexity of questions and reduced overall laboratory time required for examinations, the Physical Therapy Program at Mercer University has introduced oral laboratory examinations for the gross anatomy course series.

摘要

创建和管理传统标记解剖实验室考试的过程既耗时又费力,而且限制了学生对实验室的访问。根据班级规模和课程数量的不同,创建、管理和分解标记实验室考试可能需要一到两个八小时的工作日。在创建标记考试的过程中,由于学生无法进入解剖实验室,学生的生产力可能会降低。此外,标记实验室考试中可以提出的问题类型可能会限制学生对较低认知能力的评估,也可能限制教师评估学生对解剖和临床概念的理解能力。解剖学是物理治疗课程的基础科学,要想顺利通过后续的临床课程,学生必须对解剖学有透彻的理解。然而,传统的解剖学考试方法可能无法反映物理治疗学生所需的临床思维过程。传统的实验室考试方法还通过限制考试设置和分解期间的访问来降低学生的生产力。为了提供更复杂的问题和减少考试所需的总体实验室时间,默瑟大学的物理治疗项目为大体解剖课程系列引入了口头实验室考试。

相似文献

1
Oral anatomy laboratory examinations in a physical therapy program.口腔解剖学实验室考试在物理治疗项目中。
Anat Sci Educ. 2013 Jul-Aug;6(4):271-6. doi: 10.1002/ase.1339. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
2
Equivalence of students' scores on timed and untimed anatomy practical examinations.计时和非计时解剖学实践考试中学生分数的等效性。
Anat Sci Educ. 2013 Sep-Oct;6(5):281-5. doi: 10.1002/ase.1357. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
3
Team-based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students' attitudes toward teamwork.在大体解剖实验室中基于团队的学习可提高学业成绩以及学生对团队合作的态度。
Anat Sci Educ. 2015 Mar-Apr;8(2):95-103. doi: 10.1002/ase.1460. Epub 2014 May 2.
4
Assessment outcomes: computerized instruction in a human gross anatomy course.评估结果:人体大体解剖学课程中的计算机化教学
J Allied Health. 2002 Fall;31(3):153-8.
5
Gross anatomy education for South African undergraduate physiotherapy students.南非本科物理治疗学生的大体解剖学教育。
Anat Sci Educ. 2018 Nov;11(6):554-564. doi: 10.1002/ase.1763. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
6
[The physical therapy undergraduate students' responses to the gross human anatomy subjects].[物理治疗专业本科学生对大体人体解剖学课程的反应]
Kaibogaku Zasshi. 2008 Sep;83(3):81-6.
7
Student performance on practical gross anatomy examinations is not affected by assessment modality.学生在大体解剖学实践考试中的表现不受评估方式的影响。
Anat Sci Educ. 2016 Mar-Apr;9(2):111-20. doi: 10.1002/ase.1542. Epub 2015 May 15.
8
The integrated anatomy practical paper: A robust assessment method for anatomy education today.整体解剖学实践考试:当今解剖学教育的一种可靠评估方法。
Anat Sci Educ. 2015 Jan-Feb;8(1):63-73. doi: 10.1002/ase.1454. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
9
A Pilot Study of a Physical Therapy Cadaveric Anatomy Course: Assessing the Impact of Examination Format on the Learning Environment.物理治疗尸体解剖课程的初步研究:评估考试形式对学习环境的影响。
Anat Sci Educ. 2021 May;14(3):352-360. doi: 10.1002/ase.2011. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
10
Use of electronic anatomy practical examinations for remediating "at risk" students.利用电子解剖实践考试来补救“有风险”的学生。
Anat Sci Educ. 2010 Jan-Feb;3(1):46-9. doi: 10.1002/ase.120.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of traditional versus hotspot-driven anatomy practical assessment on student cognitive processes.传统解剖学实践评估与热点驱动解剖学实践评估对学生认知过程的影响。
Anat Sci Educ. 2025 Sep;18(9):985-994. doi: 10.1002/ase.70075. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
2
Exploring perceptions of alternative assessment and grading in graduate anatomy education.探索研究生解剖学教育中对替代性评估和评分的看法。
Anat Sci Educ. 2025 Feb;18(2):172-191. doi: 10.1002/ase.2550. Epub 2024 Dec 31.