Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Jul;38(1):72-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23962. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
To evaluate the feasibility of free-breathing three-dimensional (3D) phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) Turbo FLASH late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) magnetic resonance images (MRI) on left ventricular scar in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with clinically established breathhold two-dimensional (2D) PSIR Turbo FLASH images.
In 58 consecutive patients with confirmed CAD, LGE MRI using the two sequences have been acquired. Image quality was graded on a four-point scale according to the image appearance. Qualitative evaluation including the distribution area and the transmural extent of the scar based on the American Heart Association's (AHA's) 17-segment model was performed in both of 2D and 3D images. The scar volumes were compared quantitatively between 2D and 3D images.
A total of 51 individuals were used for final statistical analysis. No differences were noted in image quality (P = 0.80), scar distribution area (P = 0.17), and scar transmural extent (P = 0.20) between 3D and 2D images. There was strong correlation in scar volume between the 3D and 2D results (r = 0.940; P < 0.001; Y = 0.298 + 1.251X, R(2) = 0.876). But the scar volume derived from 3D images was significantly larger than that derived from 2D images (2D versus 3D, 20.08 ± 9.41 cm(3) versus 25.41 ± 12.57 cm(3) , t = -7.60; P < 0.001). The trend toward a larger scar volume identified by 3D method was indicated through Bland-Altman analysis.
Free-breathing 3D PSIR Turbo FLASH imaging is another feasible method to identify left ventricular myocardial scar in patients with CAD and detects more scar volume compared with breathhold 2D PSIR Turbo FLASH imaging.
评估自由呼吸三维(3D)相位敏感反转恢复(PSIR)Turbo FLASH 晚期钆增强(LGE)磁共振成像(MRI)在冠心病(CAD)患者左心室瘢痕中的可行性,与临床公认的屏气二维(2D)PSIR Turbo FLASH 图像进行比较。
在 58 例连续确诊为 CAD 的患者中,获取了两种序列的 LGE MRI。根据图像外观,图像质量按四点量表进行分级。在 2D 和 3D 图像上,根据美国心脏协会(AHA)的 17 节段模型,对瘢痕的分布区域和透壁程度进行定性评估。在 2D 和 3D 图像之间比较瘢痕体积的定量比较。
共有 51 名个体进行了最终的统计分析。在图像质量(P = 0.80)、瘢痕分布区域(P = 0.17)和瘢痕透壁程度(P = 0.20)方面,3D 和 2D 图像之间无差异。3D 和 2D 结果之间的瘢痕体积存在很强的相关性(r = 0.940;P < 0.001;Y = 0.298 + 1.251X,R2 = 0.876)。但是,3D 图像得出的瘢痕体积明显大于 2D 图像得出的瘢痕体积(2D 与 3D,20.08 ± 9.41 cm3 与 25.41 ± 12.57 cm3,t = -7.60;P < 0.001)。通过 Bland-Altman 分析,表明 3D 方法检测到的瘢痕体积较大的趋势。
自由呼吸 3D PSIR Turbo FLASH 成像方法是另一种在 CAD 患者中识别左心室心肌瘢痕的可行方法,与屏气 2D PSIR Turbo FLASH 成像相比,检测到更多的瘢痕体积。