• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Healthcare reform from the inside: A neurosurgical clinical quality program.内部医疗改革:一项神经外科临床质量计划。
Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:128. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.102943. Epub 2012 Oct 27.
2
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
3
Quality and Patient Safety Metrics: Developing a Structured Program for Improving Patient Care in the Department of Medicine at The Ottawa Hospital.质量和患者安全指标:为改善渥太华医院内科患者护理而制定的结构化计划。
Acad Med. 2024 Jul 1;99(7):736-740. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005693. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
6
Building a departmental quality program: a patient-based and provider-led approach.建立部门质量计划:以患者为基础和以提供者为导向的方法。
Acad Med. 2011 Mar;86(3):314-20. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318209346e.
7
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
8
Identifying priorities for quality improvement at an emergency Department in Ghana.确定加纳某急诊科质量改进的优先事项。
BMC Emerg Med. 2017 Aug 30;17(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12873-017-0139-0.
9
Improving the quality of workers' compensation health care delivery: the Washington State Occupational Health Services Project.提高工伤赔偿医疗服务质量:华盛顿州职业健康服务项目。
Milbank Q. 2001;79(1):5-33. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00194.
10
Strategies for Developing and Recognizing Faculty Working in Quality Improvement and Patient Safety.发展和识别从事质量改进和患者安全工作的教师的策略。
Acad Med. 2017 Jan;92(1):52-57. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001230.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of a patient education bundle on neurosurgery patient satisfaction.患者教育套餐对神经外科患者满意度的影响。
Surg Neurol Int. 2015 Nov 16;6(Suppl 22):S567-72. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.169538. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating patient satisfaction with the Office of Patient Advocacy.
J Cancer Educ. 2011 Mar;26(1):44-50. doi: 10.1007/s13187-010-0153-3.
2
Underresourced hospital infection control and prevention programs: penny wise, pound foolish?资源不足的医院感染控制与预防项目:贪小便宜吃大亏?
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Jul;28(7):767-73. doi: 10.1086/518518. Epub 2007 May 31.
3
Estimating health care-associated infections and deaths in U.S. hospitals, 2002.2002年美国医院医疗保健相关感染及死亡情况的估算
Public Health Rep. 2007 Mar-Apr;122(2):160-6. doi: 10.1177/003335490712200205.
4
The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.美国为成年人提供的医疗保健质量。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26;348(26):2635-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa022615.
5
Costs of medical injuries in Utah and Colorado.犹他州和科罗拉多州医疗伤害的成本。
Inquiry. 1999 Fall;36(3):255-64.
6
A computer alert system to prevent injury from adverse drug events: development and evaluation in a community teaching hospital.一种预防药物不良事件所致伤害的计算机警报系统:在社区教学医院的开发与评估
JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1317-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1317.
7
Preventable adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a comparative study of intensive care and general care units.住院患者中可预防的药物不良事件:重症监护病房与普通病房的对比研究
Crit Care Med. 1997 Aug;25(8):1289-97. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199708000-00014.
8
The costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Adverse Drug Events Prevention Study Group.住院患者药物不良事件的成本。药物不良事件预防研究组。
JAMA. 1997;277(4):307-11.
9
Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality.住院患者的药物不良事件。住院时间延长、额外费用及可归因死亡率。
JAMA. 1997;277(4):301-6.
10
The incident reporting system does not detect adverse drug events: a problem for quality improvement.事件报告系统无法检测到药物不良事件:这是质量改进中的一个问题。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995 Oct;21(10):541-8. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30180-8.

内部医疗改革:一项神经外科临床质量计划。

Healthcare reform from the inside: A neurosurgical clinical quality program.

作者信息

Afsar-Manesh Nasim, Martin Neil A

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States ; Department of Internal Medicine, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.

出版信息

Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:128. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.102943. Epub 2012 Oct 27.

DOI:10.4103/2152-7806.102943
PMID:23227433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3513849/
Abstract

During the past decade, the U.S. health care system has faced increasing challenges in delivering high quality of care, ensuring patient safety, providing access to care, and maintaining manageable costs. While reform progresses at a national level, health care providers have a responsibility and obligation to advance quality and safety. In 2009, the authors implemented a department-wide Clinical Quality Program. This Program comprised of an inter-disciplinary group of providers and staff working together to ensure the highest quality of patient care. The following methodology was followed to establish the Program: (1) Identifying the Department's quality improvement (QI) and patient safety priorities based on reviewing prior performance data; (2) Aligning the Department's priorities with institutional goals to select mutually significant initiatives; (3) Finalizing the goals for improvement based on departmental priorities, existing expertise and resources; (4) Launching the Program through an inter-disciplinary retreat that emphasizes open dialogue, innovative solutions, and fostering leadership in frontline providers; (5) Sustaining the QI initiatives through proactive performance review and management of barriers; and (6) Celebrating success to empower providers to remain engaged. Several challenges are inherent to the implementation of a clinical quality program, including lack of time and expertise, and the hierarchical nature of medicine, which can create a barrier to teamwork. This Program illustrates that improvement can lead to a sustainable clinical quality program and culture change.

摘要

在过去十年中,美国医疗保健系统在提供高质量护理、确保患者安全、提供医疗服务可及性以及维持可控成本方面面临着越来越多的挑战。尽管全国层面的改革在推进,但医疗保健提供者有责任和义务提高质量与安全性。2009年,作者实施了一项全部门范围的临床质量计划。该计划由一组跨学科的医疗服务提供者和工作人员共同组成,他们携手合作以确保最高质量的患者护理。建立该计划遵循了以下方法:(1)基于对先前绩效数据的审查确定部门的质量改进(QI)和患者安全重点;(2)使部门重点与机构目标保持一致,以选择具有共同重要意义的举措;(3)根据部门重点、现有专业知识和资源确定改进目标;(4)通过一次跨学科务虚会启动该计划,该务虚会强调开放对话、创新解决方案以及培养一线医疗服务提供者的领导力;(5)通过积极的绩效审查和对障碍的管理来维持质量改进举措;以及(6)庆祝成功以激励医疗服务提供者持续参与。临床质量计划的实施存在一些固有挑战,包括时间和专业知识的缺乏,以及医学的层级性质,这可能对团队合作造成障碍。该计划表明,改进能够带来可持续的临床质量计划和文化变革。