• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Data disclosure for chemical evaluations.化学评估的数据披露。
Environ Health Perspect. 2013 Feb;121(2):145-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1204942. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
2
Assuring access to data for chemical evaluations.确保获取化学品评估数据。
Environ Health Perspect. 2013 Feb;121(2):149-52. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1206101. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
3
Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.美国环保署实施的计算毒理学:为筛选和评估化学暴露、危害和风险提供高通量决策支持工具。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2010 Feb;13(2-4):197-217. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2010.483935.
4
Building a robust 21st century chemical testing program at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: recommendations for strengthening scientific engagement.在美国环境保护局建立一个强大的21世纪化学测试项目:加强科学参与的建议。
Environ Health Perspect. 2015 Jan;123(1):1-5. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1408601. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
5
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Mixture toxicity, cumulative risk, and environmental justice in United States federal policy, 1980-2016 : Why, with much known, was little done?1980-2016 年美国联邦政策中的混合物毒性、累积风险和环境公正:为什么已经了解很多,却做得很少?
Environ Health. 2021 Sep 17;20(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12940-021-00764-5.
8
VCCEP pilot: progress on evaluating children's risks and data needs.VCCEP试点项目:儿童风险评估及数据需求进展情况
Risk Anal. 2006 Jun;26(3):781-801. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00766.x.
9
Mortality and Morbidity Effects of Long-Term Exposure to Low-Level PM, BC, NO, and O: An Analysis of European Cohorts in the ELAPSE Project.长期暴露于低水平 PM、BC、NO 和 O 对死亡率和发病率的影响:ELAPSE 项目中欧洲队列的分析。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2021 Sep;2021(208):1-127.
10
U.S. EPA trims the public's right to know.美国环境保护局削减了公众的知情权。
Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Mar 15;41(6):1806-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Rapid hazard characterization of environmental chemicals using a compendium of human cell lines from different organs.利用来自不同器官的人类细胞系汇编对环境化学品进行快速危害特征描述。
ALTEX. 2020 Jun 8;37(4):623-638. doi: 10.14573/altex.2002291.
2
Access to chemical data: Lutter et al. respond.获取化学数据:卢特等人作出回应。
Environ Health Perspect. 2013 Apr;121(4):A112. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1206438R.
3
Access to chemical data used in regulatory decision making.获取监管决策中使用的化学数据。
Environ Health Perspect. 2013 Apr;121(4):A111-2. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1206438.

本文引用的文献

1
Data replication & reproducibility. Again, and again, and again .... Introduction.数据复制与可重复性。一而再,再而三,再三地……引言。
Science. 2011 Dec 2;334(6060):1225. doi: 10.1126/science.334.6060.1225.
2
Hypothesis-driven weight of evidence framework for evaluating data within the US EPA's Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program.基于假设的证据权重框架,用于评估美国环保署内分泌干扰物筛选计划中的数据。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Nov;61(2):185-91. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.07.007. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
3
Enhancing credibility of chemical safety studies: emerging consensus on key assessment criteria.提高化学品安全研究的可信度:关键评估标准的新共识。
Environ Health Perspect. 2011 Jun;119(6):757-64. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002737. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
4
Scientific integrity.科学诚信。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2009 Aug;54(3):213. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.05.012. Epub 2009 May 23.
5
Conflict of interest and public policy.利益冲突与公共政策。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2009 Apr;53(3):159-60. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.02.003. Epub 2009 Feb 21.
6
Scientific and legal perspectives on science generated for regulatory activities.关于为监管活动而开展的科学研究的科学及法律视角。
Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Jan;116(1):136-41. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9978.
7
Uniform administrative requirements for grants and agreements with institutions of higher education, hospitals and other non-profit organizations--OMB. Final revision to OMB circular A-110.
Fed Regist. 1993 Nov 29;58(227):62992-3005.

化学评估的数据披露。

Data disclosure for chemical evaluations.

机构信息

Independent Consultant, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 2013 Feb;121(2):145-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1204942. Epub 2012 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1289/ehp.1204942
PMID:23228957
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3569678/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Public disclosure of scientific data used by the government to make regulatory decisions for chemicals is a practical step that can enhance public confidence in the scientific basis of such decisions.

OBJECTIVES

We reviewed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) current practices regarding disclosure of data underlying regulatory and policy decisions involving chemicals, including pesticides. We sought to identify additional opportunities for the U.S. EPA to disclose data and, more generally, to promote broad access to data it uses, regardless of origin.

DISCUSSION

We recommend that when the U.S. EPA proposes a regulatory determination or other policy decision that relies on scientific research, it should provide sufficient underlying raw data and information about methods to enable reanalysis and attempts to independently reproduce the work, including the sensitivity of results to alternative analyses. This recommendation applies regardless of who conducted the work. If the U.S. EPA is unable to provide such transparency, it should state whether it had full access to all underlying data and methods. A timely version of submitted data cleared of information about confidential business matters and personal privacy should fully meet the standards of transparency described below, including public access sufficient for others to undertake an independent reanalysis.

CONCLUSION

Reliable chemical evaluation is essential for protecting public health and the environment and for ensuring availability of useful chemicals under appropriate conditions. Permitting qualified researchers to endeavor to independently reproduce the analyses used in regulatory determinations of pesticides and other chemicals would increase confidence in the scientific basis of such determinations.

摘要

背景

公开政府用于制定化学品监管决策的科学数据是一项切实可行的举措,可以增强公众对这些决策科学基础的信心。

目的

我们审查了美国环境保护署(EPA)目前在涉及化学品(包括农药)的监管和政策决策中披露数据的做法。我们试图确定美国环境保护署进一步公开数据的机会,更广泛地促进对其使用的数据的广泛获取,无论数据来源如何。

讨论

我们建议,当美国环境保护署提出依赖科学研究的监管决定或其他政策决定时,应提供足够的基础原始数据和有关方法的信息,以便能够进行重新分析并尝试独立重现工作,包括结果对替代分析的敏感性。这一建议适用于所有开展工作的人。如果美国环境保护署无法提供这种透明度,则应说明其是否完全掌握了所有基础数据和方法。提交的数据应及时清除有关商业机密和个人隐私的信息,以充分满足下文所述的透明度标准,包括为其他人员进行独立重新分析提供足够的公众访问权限。

结论

可靠的化学品评估对于保护公众健康和环境以及确保在适当条件下获得有用的化学品至关重要。允许合格的研究人员努力独立重现用于监管决定中农药和其他化学品的分析,将增加对这些决定科学基础的信心。