National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia. rosemary.korda@ anu.edu.au
Med J Aust. 2012 Dec 10;197(11):631-6. doi: 10.5694/mja12.11035.
To investigate variation, and quantify socioeconomic inequalities, in the uptake of primary bariatric surgery in an obese population.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective population-based cohort study of 49,364 individuals aged 45-74 years with body mass index (BMI)≥30 kg/m2. Data from questionnaires (distributed from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2008) were linked to hospital and death data to 30 June 2010. The sample was drawn from the 45 and Up Study (approximately 10% of New South Wales population aged 45 included, response rate approximately 18%).
Rates of bariatric surgery and adjusted rate ratios (RRs) in relation to health and sociodemographic characteristics.
Over 111,757 person-years (py) of follow-up, 312 participants had bariatric surgery, a rate of 27.92 per 10,000 py (95% CI, 24.91-31.19). Rates were highest in women, those living in major cities and those with diabetes, and increased significantly with a higher BMI and number of chronic health conditions. Adjusted RRs were 5.27 (95% CI, 3.18-8.73) for those with annual household income≥ $70 000 versus those with household income<$20,000, and 4.01 (95% CI, 2.41-6.67) for those living in areas in the least disadvantaged quintile versus those in the most disadvantaged quintile. Having versus not having private health insurance (age- and sex-adjusted RR, 9.25; 95% CI, 5.70-15.00) partially explained the observed inequalities.
Bariatric surgery has been shown to be cost-effective in treating severe obesity and associated illnesses. While bariatric surgery rates in Australia are higher in those with health problems, large socioeconomic inequalities are apparent. Our findings suggest these procedures are largely available to those who can afford private health insurance and associated out-of-pocket costs, with poor access in populations who are most in need. Continuing inequalities in access are likely to exacerbate existing inequalities in obesity and related health problems.
研究肥胖人群中初级减肥手术的接受情况的变化,并定量评估社会经济不平等现象。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项对 49364 名年龄在 45-74 岁、体重指数(BMI)≥30kg/m2 的人群进行的前瞻性基于人群的队列研究。数据来自于 2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 12 月 31 日期间分发的问卷,并与 2010 年 6 月 30 日的医院和死亡数据相关联。该样本来自 45 岁及以上研究(包括新南威尔士州大约 10%的 45 岁人群,应答率约为 18%)。
与健康和社会人口统计学特征相关的减肥手术率和调整后的比率比(RR)。
在 111757 人年(py)的随访期间,312 名参与者接受了减肥手术,发生率为每 10000py 27.92 例(95%可信区间,24.91-31.19)。女性、居住在主要城市和患有糖尿病的人群发生率最高,且随着 BMI 的增加和慢性健康状况的增加而显著增加。与年收入≥70000 澳元的人群相比,年收入<$20000 澳元的人群的调整后 RR 为 5.27(95%可信区间,3.18-8.73),与居住在最贫困五分位数地区的人群相比,居住在最贫困五分位数地区的人群的调整后 RR 为 4.01(95%可信区间,2.41-6.67)。与没有私人医疗保险相比,有私人医疗保险(年龄和性别调整后的 RR,9.25;95%可信区间,5.70-15.00)部分解释了观察到的不平等现象。
减肥手术已被证明在治疗严重肥胖和相关疾病方面具有成本效益。虽然澳大利亚的减肥手术率在有健康问题的人群中较高,但存在明显的社会经济不平等现象。我们的研究结果表明,这些手术主要提供给那些能够负担得起私人医疗保险和相关自费费用的人群,而那些最需要的人群则无法获得这些手术。持续存在的获得机会不平等可能会加剧肥胖和相关健康问题的现有不平等现象。