Phelps P D, Wright A
Department of Imaging, Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, London.
Clin Radiol. 1990 Mar;41(3):156-62. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)80958-4.
Acquired cholesteatoma of the middle ear is usually diagnosed by otoscopy and treated by exploratory surgery. The role of imaging for such cases is as controversial now as it was 10 years ago, despite significant improvements in spatial and contrast resolution resulting from computerised sectional imaging. We examined 16 cases of straightforward acquired middle ear cholesteatomas with MR as well as high resolution CT scanning to assess the possibilities for tissue characterisation. Cases of the much rarer but more important congenital cholesteatoma of the petrous pyramid with a normal eardrum were also diagnosed by CT and MRI. Magnetic resonance will distinguish cholesteatoma from granulation tissue, fluid and the cholesterol granuloma in the middle ear but this differentiation is of no practical value. An expansile lesion in the petrous apex is most likely to be a cholesteatoma or cholesterol granuloma and is well shown but not differentiated by CT. The two types have quite different characteristics on MR protocols and this is important for planning surgical procedures.
中耳获得性胆脂瘤通常通过耳镜检查诊断,并通过探查性手术治疗。尽管计算机断层成像在空间和对比度分辨率方面有了显著提高,但目前影像学在这类病例中的作用仍像10年前一样存在争议。我们对16例单纯性获得性中耳胆脂瘤患者进行了磁共振成像(MR)以及高分辨率计算机断层扫描(CT),以评估组织特征分析的可能性。岩尖部极为罕见但更为重要的先天性胆脂瘤伴鼓膜正常的病例也通过CT和MRI得以诊断。磁共振成像能够将胆脂瘤与中耳内的肉芽组织、液体及胆固醇肉芽肿区分开来,但这种区分并无实际价值。岩尖部的膨胀性病变最有可能是胆脂瘤或胆固醇肉芽肿,CT能很好地显示,但无法区分。这两种类型在MR检查方案上具有截然不同的特征,这对于手术方案的规划很重要。