• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创减重手术中套管部位疝的发生率:多孔与单孔腹腔镜的比较。

The incidence of trocar-site hernia in minimally invasive bariatric surgery: a comparison of multi versus single-port laparoscopy.

机构信息

St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, Institute for Bariatric and Minimally Invasive Surgery, 1111 Amsterdam Avenue, Babcock 4W, New York, NY 10025, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1287-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2597-5. Epub 2012 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-012-2597-5
PMID:23232997
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Single-port laparoscopy (SPL) employs a 1.5- to 2.5-cm incision at the umbilicus for the placement of a single working port. We hypothesized that the longer incision created by SPL compared with multiport laparoscopy may increase the incidence of trocar-site hernias. We examined our experience with SPL in bariatric operations.

METHODS

There were 734 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding procedures performed at our institution between 2001 and 2011. Fifty-eight patients were lost to follow-up or had a short duration of follow-up (<1 month). Of the remaining 676 cases, 163 were performed via SPL. All laparoscopic wounds created by trocar size greater than 12 mm were closed with absorbable suture.

RESULTS

Patient demographics of the SPL group and the multiport group were similar in terms of age, gender, and comorbidities. The average body mass index (BMI) of the SPL group was lower than the multiport group (43.5 ± 5.3 vs. 45.8 ± 7.7, p < 0.01). The mean follow-up for the SPL group was 11 months versus 24 months for the multiport group. There were three trocar-site hernias out of 513 cases in the multiport compared to one hernia out of 163 cases in the SPL group (0.6 vs. 0.6 %, p = 0.967). All trocar-site hernias occurred at the 15-mm port site. The median time to hernia occurrence for the multiport group was 13 months (range, 1-18). In the SPL group, the hernia occurred at 8 months. On multivariate analysis, age, BMI, SPL, procedure type, and the postoperative weight loss were not associated with the development of trocar-site hernias.

CONCLUSIONS

SPL did not increase the rate of trocar-site hernia in this series. A low rate of trocar-site hernia can be achieved with the use of SPL in bariatric surgery.

摘要

简介

单孔腹腔镜(SPL)采用脐部 1.5-2.5cm 的切口置入单一切口工作通道。我们假设与多孔腹腔镜相比,SPL 造成的更长切口可能会增加套管部位疝的发生率。我们检查了我们在减重手术中使用 SPL 的经验。

方法

我们机构在 2001 年至 2011 年间进行了 734 例腹腔镜袖状胃切除术和腹腔镜可调胃束带术。58 例患者失访或随访时间短(<1 个月)。在剩余的 676 例患者中,有 163 例通过 SPL 进行。所有大于 12mm 套管大小的腹腔镜切口均用可吸收缝线缝合。

结果

SPL 组和多孔组患者的人口统计学特征在年龄、性别和合并症方面相似。SPL 组的平均体重指数(BMI)低于多孔组(43.5±5.3 比 45.8±7.7,p<0.01)。SPL 组的平均随访时间为 11 个月,而多孔组为 24 个月。多孔组中有 3 例套管部位疝(513 例),SPL 组中有 1 例(163 例)(0.6%比 0.6%,p=0.967)。所有套管部位疝均发生在 15mm 套管部位。多孔组发生疝的中位时间为 13 个月(范围,1-18 个月)。在 SPL 组,疝发生在 8 个月时。多变量分析显示,年龄、BMI、SPL、手术类型和术后减重与套管部位疝的发生无关。

结论

在本系列中,SPL 并未增加套管部位疝的发生率。在减重手术中使用 SPL 可实现低套管部位疝发生率。

相似文献

1
The incidence of trocar-site hernia in minimally invasive bariatric surgery: a comparison of multi versus single-port laparoscopy.微创减重手术中套管部位疝的发生率:多孔与单孔腹腔镜的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1287-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2597-5. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
2
Trocar Port Hernias After Bariatric Surgery.减重手术后的套管针穿刺孔疝
Obes Surg. 2016 Mar;26(3):546-51. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1779-3.
3
Trocar Site Hernias in Bariatric Surgery-an Underestimated Issue: a Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.减重手术中的套管部位疝:一个被低估的问题:定性系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2019 Mar;29(3):1049-1057. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-03687-2.
4
Trocar site hernia after bariatric surgery: our experience without fascial closure.减重手术后的套管部位疝:我们不进行筋膜关闭的经验。
Int J Surg. 2014;12 Suppl 1:S83-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.047. Epub 2014 May 23.
5
Incidence of port-site incisional hernia after single-incision laparoscopic surgery.单孔腹腔镜手术后切口疝的发生率。
JSLS. 2014 Apr-Jun;18(2):204-10. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422518317.
6
Trocar site hernia development in patients undergoing robotically assisted or standard laparoscopic staging surgery for endometrial cancer.接受机器人辅助或标准腹腔镜分期手术治疗子宫内膜癌患者的套管穿刺部位疝的发生情况。
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Nov;147(2):371-374. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
7
Risk factors and the prevalence of trocar site herniation after laparoscopic fundoplication.腹腔镜胃底折叠术后套管针穿刺部位疝的危险因素及患病率
Surg Endosc. 2001 Jul;15(7):663-6. doi: 10.1007/s004640080146. Epub 2001 May 11.
8
Trocar Site HERnias After Bariatric Laparoscopic Surgery (HERBALS): a Prospective Cohort Study.减重腹腔镜手术后套管部位疝(HERBALS):一项前瞻性队列研究。
Obes Surg. 2020 May;30(5):1820-1826. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04400-y.
9
Incisional and port-site hernias following robotic colorectal surgery.机器人结直肠手术后的切口疝和穿刺孔疝
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3505-10. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4639-2. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
10
Evaluation of port site hernias, chronic pain and recurrence rates after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a monocentric long-term study.腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术后切口疝、慢性疼痛及复发率的评估:一项单中心长期研究
Hernia. 2017 Dec;21(6):917-923. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1663-2. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-incision versus conventional multi-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy for suspected uncomplicated appendicitis.单切口与传统多孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗疑似单纯性阑尾炎的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 5;11(11):CD009022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009022.pub3.
2
Single-Port One Anastomosis Sleeve Gastrectomy with Transit Bipartition: Initial Experience and Technique.单孔双通道吻合套入式胃旁路术:初步经验与技术。
Obes Surg. 2024 Jul;34(7):2739-2743. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07295-1. Epub 2024 May 21.
3
Postoperative ileus after laparoscopic primary and incisional abdominal hernia repair with intraperitoneal mesh (DynaMesh®-IPOM versus Parietex™ Composite): a single institution experience.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review of trocar-site hernia.经皮套管疝的系统评价。
Br J Surg. 2012 Mar;99(3):315-23. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7836. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
2
Single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial.单切口与标准 3 孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Ann Surg. 2011 Oct;254(4):586-90. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823003b5.
3
Single incision versus conventional multi-incision appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis.单切口与传统多切口阑尾切除术治疗疑似阑尾炎的比较。
腹腔镜原发性和切口疝修补术中腹腔内补片(DynaMesh®-IPOM 与 Parietex™ Composite)后术后肠梗阻:单中心经验。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Feb;406(1):209-218. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01898-9. Epub 2020 May 31.
4
Consecutive Versus Selective Primary and Revisional Single Incision Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: Personal Experience in 330 Cases.连续与选择性初次和翻修单切口腹腔镜减重手术:330 例个人经验。
Obes Surg. 2020 Apr;30(4):1515-1526. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04356-8.
5
Single Incision Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery: From Myth to Reality a Case Series.单切口儿科内镜手术:从神话到现实——病例系列。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Sep 7;55(9):574. doi: 10.3390/medicina55090574.
6
Trocar site closure with a novel anchor-based (neoClose) system versus standard suture closure: a prospective randomized controlled trial.新型锚定式(neoClose)系统与标准缝线闭合法在trocar 部位闭合中的对比:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1270-1276. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06891-y. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
7
Impact of Routine 12 mm Epigastric Trocar Site Closure on Incisional Hernia After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Prospective Before/After Study.胃袖状切除术术后常规 12mm 剑突切口部位关闭对切口疝的影响:一项前瞻性前后对照研究。
Obes Surg. 2019 Nov;29(11):3500-3507. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03971-9.
8
Port site hernia after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study of 352 patients.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后切口疝:一项对352例患者的回顾性队列研究。
Updates Surg. 2018 Mar;70(1):91-95. doi: 10.1007/s13304-017-0501-5. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
9
Postoperative complications as an independent risk factor for recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study of 417 patients with long-term follow-up.术后并发症作为腹腔镜腹疝修补术后复发的独立危险因素:一项对417例患者进行长期随访的前瞻性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1469-1477. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5140-2. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
10
Single-incision port-site herniation: meta-analysis vs. nationwide cohort study.单切口端口部位疝:荟萃分析与全国队列研究
Hernia. 2016 Feb;20(1):11-2. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1401-6. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6(7):CD009022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009022.pub2.
4
Laparoscopic surgery performed through a single incision: a systematic review of the current literature.单切口腹腔镜手术:当前文献的系统评价
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jan;212(1):113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.008. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
5
Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy.随机对照临床试验:单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较。
Br J Surg. 2010 Jul;97(7):1007-12. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7087.
6
Long-term study of port-site incisional hernia after laparoscopic procedures.腹腔镜手术后切口疝的长期研究。
JSLS. 2009 Jul-Sep;13(3):346-9.
7
Laparoscopic single-site surgery for placement of adjustable gastric band--a series of 22 cases.腹腔镜单部位手术放置可调胃束带——22 例系列研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 Jan-Feb;6(1):41-5. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2009.03.220. Epub 2009 Apr 16.
8
Mid-term follow-up after sleeve gastrectomy as a final approach for morbid obesity.袖状胃切除术后的中期随访作为病态肥胖的最终治疗方法。
Obes Surg. 2009 May;19(5):544-8. doi: 10.1007/s11695-009-9818-6. Epub 2009 Mar 12.
9
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidents and complications. A retrospective analysis of 9542 consecutive laparoscopic operations.腹腔镜胆囊切除术:术中情况与并发症。对9542例连续腹腔镜手术的回顾性分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2003;5(3):152-8. doi: 10.1080/13651820310015293.
10
Trocar site hernia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后穿刺孔疝
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007 Oct;17(5):600-3. doi: 10.1089/lap.2006.0182.