• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术后并发症作为腹腔镜腹疝修补术后复发的独立危险因素:一项对417例患者进行长期随访的前瞻性研究。

Postoperative complications as an independent risk factor for recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study of 417 patients with long-term follow-up.

作者信息

Mercoli Henry, Tzedakis Stylianos, D'Urso Antonio, Nedelcu Marius, Memeo Riccardo, Meyer Nicolas, Vix Michel, Perretta Silvana, Mutter Didier

机构信息

Digestive and Endocrine Surgery Department, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg University Hospital, Institut de Recherche contre les Cancers de l'Appareil Digestif (IRCAD), Institute of Image-Guided Surgery (IHU Mix-Surg), 1 place de l'Hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France.

Biostatistics and Public Health Department, Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1469-1477. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5140-2. Epub 2016 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-016-5140-2
PMID:27495336
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) has become widely used. This study evaluates outcomes of LVHR, with particular reference to complications, seromas, and long-term recurrence.

METHODS

A review of a prospective database of consecutive patients undergoing LVHR with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) was performed at a single institution. Patient's characteristics, surgical procedures, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed and related to long-term recurrence.

RESULTS

From 2005 to 2014, 417 patients underwent LVHR. Mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 54 years and 31 kg/m. Mesh fixation was carried out with transfascial sutures, completed with absorbable tacks (72 %), metal tacks (24 %), or intraperitoneal sutures (4 %). Intraoperative complications occurred in three patients. Overall morbidity included 8.25 % of minor complications and 2.5 % of major complications without mortality. The overall recurrence rate was 9.8 %. Median time for recurrence was 15.3 months (3-72) and median follow-up was 31.6 months (8-119). In a multivariate analysis, previous interventions (OR 1.44; CI 1.15-1.79; p = 0.01), postoperative complications (OR 2.57; CI 1.09-6.03; p = 0.03), and Clavien-Dindo score >2 (OR 1.43; CI 1.031-1.876; p = 0.02) appeared as independent prognostic factors of recurrence. Minor complications were associated with 14.7 % of recurrence and major complications with 30 % of recurrence. Emergency LVHR (6 %) did not increase the rate of complications. Overall seroma rate was 18.7 %, with 1.4 % of persisting or complicated seroma. BMI (OR 1.05; CI 1.01-1.08; p = 0.026) and vascular surgery history (OR 5.74; CI 2.11-15.58; p < 0.001) were independent predictive factors for seroma. Recurrence did not appear to be related to seroma.

CONCLUSION

LVHR combines the benefits of laparoscopy with those of mesh repair. Seroma formation should no longer be considered as a complication. It is spontaneously regressive in most cases. Postoperative complications and their degree of severity appear to be independent prognostic factors for recurrence, which can be limited with a standardized technique and may make IPOM-LVHR a reference procedure.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜腹疝修补术(LVHR)已得到广泛应用。本研究评估LVHR的疗效,特别关注并发症、血清肿和长期复发情况。

方法

在单一机构对接受腹腔镜腹膜内补片修补术(IPOM)的连续LVHR患者的前瞻性数据库进行回顾。分析患者特征、手术过程和术后结果,并与长期复发情况相关联。

结果

2005年至2014年,417例患者接受了LVHR。平均年龄和体重指数(BMI)分别为54岁和31kg/m²。补片通过经筋膜缝线固定,并用可吸收钉(72%)、金属钉(24%)或腹膜内缝线(4%)完成。3例患者发生术中并发症。总体发病率包括8.25%的轻微并发症和2.5%的严重并发症,无死亡病例。总体复发率为9.8%。复发的中位时间为15.3个月(3 - 72个月),中位随访时间为31.6个月(8 - 119个月)。多因素分析显示,既往干预(OR 1.44;CI 1.15 - 1.79;p = 0.01)、术后并发症(OR 2.57;CI 1.09 - 6.03;p = 0.03)和Clavien - Dindo评分>2(OR 1.43;CI 1.031 - 1.876;p = 0.02)是复发的独立预后因素。轻微并发症与14.7%的复发相关,严重并发症与30%的复发相关。急诊LVHR(6%)并未增加并发症发生率。总体血清肿发生率为18.7%,持续性或复杂性血清肿发生率为1.4%。BMI(OR 1.05;CI 1.01 - 1.08;p = 0.026)和血管手术史(OR 5.74;CI 2.11 - 15.58;p < 0.001)是血清肿的独立预测因素。复发似乎与血清肿无关。

结论

LVHR兼具腹腔镜手术和补片修补的优点。血清肿形成不应再被视为一种并发症。在大多数情况下,它会自行消退。术后并发症及其严重程度似乎是复发的独立预后因素,采用标准化技术可减少复发,这可能使IPOM - LVHR成为一种参考术式。

相似文献

1
Postoperative complications as an independent risk factor for recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study of 417 patients with long-term follow-up.术后并发症作为腹腔镜腹疝修补术后复发的独立危险因素:一项对417例患者进行长期随访的前瞻性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1469-1477. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5140-2. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
2
Comparison of Mesh Fixation Techniques in Elective Laparoscopic Repair of Incisional Hernia-ReliaTack™ v ProTack™ (TACKoMesh) - A double-blind randomised controlled trial.择期腹腔镜切口疝修补术中Mesh固定技术的比较——ReliaTack™与ProTack™(TACKoMesh)——一项双盲随机对照试验。
BMC Surg. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0378-3.
3
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primary fascial closure versus bridged repair: a risk-adjusted comparative study.腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术:一期筋膜闭合与桥接修补的风险调整比较研究
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3231-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4644-5. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
4
Robotic-assisted ventral and incisional hernia repair with hernia defect closure and intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) experience.机器人辅助腹侧和切口疝修补术,包括疝缺损闭合和腹膜内补片植入(IPOM)经验。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Oct;14(5):695-701. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01040-y. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
5
Pain and Surgical Outcomes Reporting After Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair in Relation to Mesh Fixation Technique: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.腹腔镜腹疝修补术后疼痛与手术结局报告与补片固定技术的关系:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Nov;28(11):1298-1315. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0609. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
6
Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) with fascial repair (IPOM-plus) for ventral and incisional hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜腹腔内补片修补术(IPOM)联合筋膜修复术(IPOM-plus)治疗腹疝和切口疝:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Apr;28(2):385-400. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02983-4. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
7
Seroma formation and method of mesh fixation in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair--highlights of a case series.腹腔镜腹疝修补术中血清肿形成和网片固定方法--病例系列的要点。
Scand J Surg. 2010;99(1):24-7. doi: 10.1177/145749691009900106.
8
Primary fascial closure during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair does not reduce 30-day wound complications.腹腔镜腹疝修补术中一期筋膜关闭并不会降低 30 天伤口并发症。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4551-4557. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5515-z. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
9
Long-term outcomes of 1326 laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair with the routine suturing concept: a single institution experience.1326例采用常规缝合理念的腹腔镜切口疝和腹疝修补术的长期疗效:单中心经验
Hernia. 2016 Feb;20(1):101-10. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1397-y. Epub 2015 Jun 21.
10
Mesh fixation techniques in primary ventral or incisional hernia repair.网片固定技术在原发性腹侧或切口疝修补术中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 28;5(5):CD011563. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011563.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Ventral hernia repair with T-line hernia mesh: A multi-institutional experience.使用T型疝修补网片进行腹疝修补术:多机构经验
Surg Pract Sci. 2025 May 12;21:100285. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2025.100285. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Ventral hernia is a chronic disease: a systematic review of long-term outcomes beyond 5 years.腹疝是一种慢性疾病:对5年以上长期结局的系统评价
Hernia. 2025 May 8;29(1):162. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03351-6.
3
Mapping the therapeutic landscape in emergency incisional hernia: a scoping review.绘制急诊切口疝的治疗前景:一项范围综述

本文引用的文献

1
Recurrence rate after absorbable tack fixation of mesh in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair.可吸收钉固定网片在腹腔镜切口疝修补术后的复发率。
Br J Surg. 2015 Apr;102(5):541-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9750. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
2
Retroprosthetic seroma after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: incidence, risk factors and clinical significance.腹腔镜腹疝修补术后假体后血清肿:发生率、危险因素及临床意义
Hernia. 2015 Dec;19(6):943-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1352-y. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
3
Meta-analysis and systematic review of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for elective incisional hernia.
Hernia. 2025 Feb 18;29(1):102. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03278-y.
4
The effect of clinically significant weight loss prior to open ventral hernia repair.临床显著体重减轻对开放性腹疝修补术的影响。
Hernia. 2024 Nov 16;29(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03208-4.
5
A Comparative Study on Outcomes and Quality of Life Changes Following Ventral Transabdominal Preperitoneal (Ventral-TAPP) and Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM)-Plus Repair for Ventral Hernia.经腹腹膜前修补术(Ventral-TAPP)与腹腔镜腹腔内补片植入修补术(IPOM)加修补腹疝后结局及生活质量变化的比较研究
Cureus. 2023 Jul 20;15(7):e42222. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42222. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Comparative long-term effectiveness between ventral hernia repairs with biosynthetic and synthetic mesh.生物合成补片与合成补片在腹疝修补中的长期疗效比较。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6044-6050. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10082-1. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
7
Transversus abdominis release (TAR) procedure: a retrospective analysis of an abdominal wall reconstruction group.腹横肌松解(TAR)术:腹壁重建组的回顾性分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 31;12(1):18325. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22062-x.
8
Predictive factors of recurrence for laparoscopic repair of primary and incisional ventral hernias with single mesh from a multicenter study.多中心研究中单网片腹腔镜修补原发性和切口疝术后复发的预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 10;12(1):4215. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08024-3.
9
Postoperative ileus after laparoscopic primary and incisional abdominal hernia repair with intraperitoneal mesh (DynaMesh®-IPOM versus Parietex™ Composite): a single institution experience.腹腔镜原发性和切口疝修补术中腹腔内补片(DynaMesh®-IPOM 与 Parietex™ Composite)后术后肠梗阻:单中心经验。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Feb;406(1):209-218. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01898-9. Epub 2020 May 31.
10
Peritoneal bridging versus fascial closure in laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay ventral hernia mesh repair: a randomized clinical trial.腹腔镜腹腔内补片修补术治疗腹外疝中腹膜桥接与筋膜闭合的比较:一项随机临床试验。
BJS Open. 2020 Aug;4(4):587-592. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50305. Epub 2020 May 28.
腹腔镜与开放网片修补术治疗择期切口疝的Meta分析和系统评价
Hernia. 2015 Jun;19(3):449-63. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1351-z. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
4
Laparoscopic treatment of incisional and primary ventral hernia in morbidly obese patients with a BMI over 35.对体重指数(BMI)超过35的病态肥胖患者进行腹腔镜下切口疝和原发性腹疝治疗。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Dec;28(12):3310-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3607-6. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
5
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: defining the learning curve.腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术:界定学习曲线
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Dec;24(6):475-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000020.
6
Recurrence and pseudorecurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: predictors and patient-focused outcomes.腹腔镜腹疝修补术后的复发与假性复发:预测因素及以患者为中心的结局
Am Surg. 2014 Feb;80(2):138-48.
7
Retrospective observational study on the incidence of incisional hernias after colorectal carcinoma resection with follow-up CT scan.一项关于结直肠癌切除术后切口疝发生率的回顾性观察研究,并进行了随访CT扫描。
Hernia. 2014;18(6):797-802. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1214-z. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
8
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: is there an optimal mesh fixation technique? A systematic review.腹腔镜腹疝修补术:是否存在最佳的补片固定技术?一项系统评价。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Jan;399(1):55-63. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1126-x.
9
Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)-part 1.腹腔镜治疗腹壁下和切口疝的指南(国际腹内疝学会 (IEHS)-第 1 部分。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):2-29. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3170-6. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
10
Risk factors for umbilical trocar site incisional hernia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective 3-year follow-up study.腹腔镜胆囊切除术脐部套管切口疝的危险因素:前瞻性 3 年随访研究。
Am J Surg. 2014 Jan;207(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.05.010. Epub 2013 Oct 7.