Hematology Branch, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2012;2012:292-300. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2012.1.292.
Advances in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) have improved survival in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) from 10%-20% in the 1960s to 80%-90% today. A matched sibling HSCT is the treatment of choice in younger patients, whereas IST is often used in older patients or in those who lack a histocompatible sibling. Graft rejection, GVHD, and poor immune reconstitution (with associated infectious complications) limit the success of HSCT, whereas lack of response, relapse, and clonal evolution limit the success of IST. The historically high rate of graft rejection in SAA is now less problematic in the matched setting, but with greater rates observed with unrelated and umbilical cord donors. The correlation of increasing age with the risk of GVHD and the significant morbidity and mortality of this transplantation complication continue to affect the decision to pursue HSCT versus IST as initial therapy in adults with SAA. Outcomes with matched unrelated donor HSCT have improved, likely due to better donor selection, supportive care, and improved transplantation protocols. Results with mismatched unrelated donor and umbilical HSCT are not as favorable, with higher rates of graft rejection, GVHD, and infectious complications. Investigation of several upfront alternative IST protocols has not improved outcomes beyond horse antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporine. More recently, the role of alemtuzumab in SAA has been better defined and an oral thrombomimetic, eltrombopag, is showing promising activity in refractory cases. The most recent advances in HSCT and IST in SAA are discussed in this review.
造血干细胞移植 (HSCT) 和免疫抑制疗法 (IST) 的进展提高了重型再生障碍性贫血 (SAA) 的生存率,从 20 世纪 60 年代的 10%-20%提高到今天的 80%-90%。对于年轻患者,匹配的同胞 HSCT 是首选治疗方法,而对于老年患者或缺乏组织相容性同胞的患者,IST 通常被使用。移植物排斥、移植物抗宿主病 (GVHD) 和免疫重建不良(伴有相关感染并发症)限制了 HSCT 的成功,而缺乏反应、复发和克隆进化限制了 IST 的成功。在匹配环境下,SAA 中历史上较高的移植物排斥率现在不再是问题,但在无关和脐带供者中观察到更高的比率。年龄增长与 GVHD 风险的相关性以及这种移植并发症的显著发病率和死亡率继续影响着成人 SAA 患者选择 HSCT 与 IST 作为初始治疗的决策。匹配无关供体 HSCT 的结果已经改善,这可能归因于更好的供体选择、支持性护理和改进的移植方案。不匹配的无关供体和脐带 HSCT 的结果并不理想,移植物排斥、GVHD 和感染并发症的发生率更高。对几种一线替代 IST 方案的研究并没有在马抗胸腺细胞球蛋白和环孢素之外改善结果。最近,阿仑单抗在 SAA 中的作用得到了更好的定义,一种口服血栓模拟物,艾曲波帕,在难治性病例中显示出有希望的活性。本文讨论了 SAA 中 HSCT 和 IST 的最新进展。