Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan,
Int J Clin Oncol. 2014 Feb;19(1):98-105. doi: 10.1007/s10147-012-0505-6. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
Preoperative detection of small peritoneal metastases is difficult, and a convenient method is required to decide the nature of procedures subsequent to initial exploratory surgery. The aim of this study was to validate the Japanese classification of peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer.
This retrospective study analyzes data from a multi-center registry. Factors affecting the extent of peritoneal metastasis, macroscopic radical resection and prognosis were analyzed using data from patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous peritoneal metastasis. Peritoneal metastasis was classified depending on extent into three groups (P1-P3).
Among 60,176 patients with colorectal surgery, 3,075 (5.1 %) had synchronous peritoneal metastasis. Tumor location on the right side (P < 0.0001), histological grade (P = 0.0014) and distant metastasis (P < 0.0001) were associated with the extent of peritoneal metastasis. Gender (P = 0.041), lymph node metastasis (P < 0.0001), distant metastasis (P < 0.0001), extent of peritoneal metastasis according to the present classification (P < 0.0001) and the period when the patient underwent the operation (operative period; P < 0.0001) were independently associated with macroscopic radical resection. Cox proportional hazards model disclosed that gender (P = 0.0046), tumor location (P = 0.032), age (P = 0.048), histological grade (P < 0.0001), lymph node metastasis (P < 0.0001), distant metastasis (P < 0.0001), extent of peritoneal metastasis (P < 0.0001), and macroscopic radical resection (P < 0.0001) were independent prognostic factors.
Macroscopic radical resection was an independent prognostic factor even without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The referral of patients without distant metastasis to centers with experienced peritoneal surgeons might be a potential option if the peritoneal metastasis is unresectable in general hospitals.
术前检测小的腹膜转移较为困难,需要一种便捷的方法来确定初始探查性手术后的手术性质。本研究旨在验证日本结直肠癌腹膜转移分类。
本回顾性研究分析了多中心登记处的数据。使用结直肠癌伴同步腹膜转移患者的数据,分析了影响腹膜转移程度、宏观根治性切除和预后的因素。根据腹膜转移程度将腹膜转移分为三组(P1-P3)。
在 60176 例结直肠手术患者中,3075 例(5.1%)存在同步腹膜转移。肿瘤位置在右侧(P<0.0001)、组织学分级(P=0.0014)和远处转移(P<0.0001)与腹膜转移程度相关。性别(P=0.041)、淋巴结转移(P<0.0001)、远处转移(P<0.0001)、根据本分类的腹膜转移程度(P<0.0001)和患者手术时间(手术期;P<0.0001)与宏观根治性切除独立相关。Cox 比例风险模型显示,性别(P=0.0046)、肿瘤位置(P=0.032)、年龄(P=0.048)、组织学分级(P<0.0001)、淋巴结转移(P<0.0001)、远处转移(P<0.0001)、腹膜转移程度(P<0.0001)和宏观根治性切除(P<0.0001)是独立的预后因素。
即使没有腹腔内热化疗,宏观根治性切除也是独立的预后因素。如果在综合医院普遍认为腹膜转移无法切除,将无远处转移的患者转介给有经验的腹膜外科医生的中心可能是一种潜在选择。