• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Thinking in three's: changing surgical patient safety practices in the complex modern operating room.三位一体思维:改变复杂现代手术室中的外科患者安全实践。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec 14;18(46):6712-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i46.6712.
2
Wrong-Site Surgery, Retained Surgical Items, and Surgical Fires : A Systematic Review of Surgical Never Events.错误部位手术、遗留手术器械和手术火灾:手术无预警事件的系统回顾。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Aug;150(8):796-805. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.0301.
3
Effectiveness of the surgical safety checklist in correcting errors: a literature review applying Reason's Swiss cheese model.手术安全核对表在纠正错误方面的有效性:一项应用瑞森瑞士奶酪模型的文献综述
AORN J. 2014 Jul;100(1):65-79.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2013.07.024.
4
Patient safety practices in the operating room: correct-site surgery and nothing left behind.手术室中的患者安全措施:正确部位手术及无异物遗留。
Surg Clin North Am. 2005 Dec;85(6):1307-19, xiii. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2005.09.007.
5
Effectiveness of Surgical Safety Checklists in Improving Patient Safety.手术安全核对表在提高患者安全方面的有效性。
Orthopedics. 2016 Mar-Apr;39(2):e307-10. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160301-02. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
6
A survey of surgical team members' perceptions of near misses and attitudes towards Time Out protocols.一项关于手术团队成员对险些失误的认知以及对暂停程序态度的调查。
BMC Surg. 2013 Oct 9;13:46. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-46.
7
Surgical counts can be risky business!手术清点可能是件风险很大的事!
Can Oper Room Nurs J. 2004 Dec;22(4):6-8, 10, 12.
8
Rates of Serious Surgical Errors in California and Plans to Prevent Recurrence.加利福尼亚州严重手术失误率及预防复发计划。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e217058. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7058.
9
Crew resource management: using aviation techniques to improve operating room safety.机组资源管理:运用航空技术提高手术室安全性。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2012 Apr;83(4):441-4. doi: 10.3357/asem.3149.2012.
10
The Economics of Patient Surgical Safety.患者手术安全的经济学
Surg Clin North Am. 2021 Feb;101(1):135-148. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2020.09.005. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Experience of a Tertiary-Level Urology Center in the Clinical Urological Events of Rare and Very Rare Incidence. I. Surgical Never Events: 3. Urological Electrosurgical Never Events.三级泌尿外科中心关于罕见及极罕见临床泌尿外科事件的经验。I. 手术零失误事件:3. 泌尿外科电外科零失误事件
Curr Urol. 2018 Oct;12(1):33-38. doi: 10.1159/000447228. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
2
Implementation of minimal invasive gynaecological surgery certification will challenge gynaecologists with new legal and ethical issues.实施微创妇科手术认证将使妇科医生面临新的法律和伦理问题。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2016 Jun 27;8(2):111-118.
3
The effect of intraoral suction on oxygen-enriched surgical environments: a mechanism for reducing the risk of surgical fires.口内吸引对富氧手术环境的影响:一种降低手术火灾风险的机制。
Anesth Prog. 2014 Winter;61(4):155-61. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-61.4.155.
4
Position-related injury is uncommon in robotic gynecologic surgery.与体位相关的损伤在机器人妇科手术中并不常见。
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Dec;135(3):534-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.10.016. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
5
Compliance with a time-out procedure intended to prevent wrong surgery in hospitals: results of a national patient safety programme in the Netherlands.遵守旨在防止医院内手术失误的暂停程序:荷兰一项全国患者安全计划的结果。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 3;4(7):e005075. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005075.
6
Factors involved in dental surgery fires: a review of the literature.牙科手术火灾的相关因素:文献综述
Anesth Prog. 2014 Spring;61(1):21-5. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-61.1.21.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of a radiofrequency detection system as an adjunct to manual counting protocols for tracking surgical sponges: a prospective trial of 2,285 patients.射频检测系统作为手动计数协议的辅助手段用于追踪手术海绵的有效性:一项涉及 2285 名患者的前瞻性试验。
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Oct;215(4):524-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
2
Using a data-matrix-coded sponge counting system across a surgical practice: impact after 18 months.在整个外科手术实践中使用数据矩阵编码的海绵计数系统:18个月后的影响。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011 Feb;37(2):51-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(11)37007-9.
3
Learning to live with complexity.学会与复杂性共存。
Harv Bus Rev. 2011 Sep;89(9):68-76, 136.
4
Crisis checklists for the operating room: development and pilot testing.手术室危机核对清单的制定与初步测试
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Aug;213(2):212-217.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.04.031. Epub 2011 Jun 11.
5
Operating room fire safety.手术室消防安全。
Ochsner J. 2011 Spring;11(1):37-42.
6
Retained surgical items and minimally invasive surgery.遗留手术器械与微创手术。
World J Surg. 2011 Jul;35(7):1532-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1060-4.
7
Prevention of 3 "never events" in the operating room: fires, gossypiboma, and wrong-site surgery.
Surg Innov. 2011 Mar;18(1):55-60. doi: 10.1177/1553350610389196. Epub 2010 Dec 27.
8
What does it take to start an oropharyngeal fire? Oxygen requirements to start fires in the operating room.引发口咽起火需要什么条件?手术室起火的氧气需求。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Feb;75(2):227-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.11.005. Epub 2010 Dec 10.
9
What is value in health care?医疗保健中的价值是什么?
N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 23;363(26):2477-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1011024. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
10
New clinical guide to surgical fire prevention. Patients can catch fire--here's how to keep them safer.手术防火新临床指南。患者可能会着火——以下是如何让他们更安全的方法。
Health Devices. 2009 Oct;38(10):314-32.

三位一体思维:改变复杂现代手术室中的外科患者安全实践。

Thinking in three's: changing surgical patient safety practices in the complex modern operating room.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA 94121, USA.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec 14;18(46):6712-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i46.6712.

DOI:10.3748/wjg.v18.i46.6712
PMID:23239908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3520159/
Abstract

The three surgical patient safety events, wrong site surgery, retained surgical items (RSI) and surgical fires are rare occurrences and thus their effects on the complex modern operating room (OR) are difficult to study. The likelihood of occurrence and the magnitude of risk for each of these surgical safety events are undefined. Many providers may never have a personal experience with one of these events and training and education on these topics are sparse. These circumstances lead to faulty thinking that a provider won't ever have an event or if one does occur the provider will intuitively know what to do. Surgeons are not preoccupied with failure and tend to usually consider good outcomes, which leads them to ignore or diminish the importance of implementing and following simple safety practices. These circumstances contribute to the persistent low level occurrence of these three events and to the difficulty in generating sufficient interest to resource solutions. Individual facilities rarely have the time or talent to understand these events and develop lasting solutions. More often than not, even the most well meaning internal review results in a new line to a policy and some rigorous enforcement mandate. This approach routinely fails and is another reason why these problems are so persistent. Vigilance actions alone have been unsuccessful so hospitals now have to take a systematic approach to implementing safer processes and providing the resources for surgeons and other stakeholders to optimize the OR environment. This article discusses standardized processes of care for mitigation of injury or outright prevention of wrong site surgery, RSI and surgical fires in an action-oriented framework illustrating the strategic elements important in each event and focusing on the responsibilities for each of the three major OR agents-anesthesiologists, surgeons and nurses. A Surgical Patient Safety Checklist is discussed that incorporates the necessary elements to bring these team members together and influence the emergence of a safer OR.

摘要

手术患者安全事件中的三个问题,即手术部位错误、手术器械遗留(RSI)和手术火灾,均为罕见事件,因此难以对其在复杂现代手术室(OR)中的影响进行研究。这些手术安全事件发生的可能性及其风险的严重程度均不明确。许多医护人员可能从未亲身经历过这些事件之一,而且针对这些主题的培训和教育也很少。这种情况导致人们错误地认为医护人员不会发生此类事件,或者如果发生了,医护人员凭直觉就知道该怎么做。外科医生不关注失败,而且通常会考虑好的结果,这使他们忽视或低估了实施和遵循简单安全实践的重要性。这种情况导致这三个事件持续低频率发生,并且难以引起足够的兴趣来提供解决方案。个别医疗机构很少有时间或人才去理解这些事件并制定持久的解决方案。通常,即使是最善意的内部审查也只是在政策中增加了一行内容,并规定了严格的执行要求。这种方法经常失败,这也是这些问题持续存在的另一个原因。仅采取警惕行动是不成功的,因此医院现在必须采取系统的方法来实施更安全的流程,并为外科医生和其他利益相关者提供资源,以优化手术室环境。本文讨论了在以行动为导向的框架中,针对减轻伤害或彻底预防手术部位错误、RSI 和手术火灾的护理标准化流程,阐明了每个事件中的重要战略要素,并重点关注手术室中三个主要角色——麻醉师、外科医生和护士的责任。讨论了手术患者安全检查表,该检查表纳入了必要元素,可将这些团队成员聚集在一起,并影响更安全手术室的出现。