Suppr超能文献

实施微创妇科手术认证将使妇科医生面临新的法律和伦理问题。

Implementation of minimal invasive gynaecological surgery certification will challenge gynaecologists with new legal and ethical issues.

作者信息

Tanos V, Socolov R, Demetriou P, Kyprianou M, Watrelot A, Van Belle Y, Campo R

机构信息

Aretaeio Hospital and St Georges Medical School, Nicosia University, Nicosia, Cyprus.

University of Medicine and Pharmacy Gr. T. Popa, Iasi, Romania.

出版信息

Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2016 Jun 27;8(2):111-118.

Abstract

The introduction of a certification / diploma program in Minimal Invasive Surgery (MIS) is expected to improve surgical performance, patient's safety and outcome. The Gynaecological Endoscopic Surgical Education and Assessment programme (GESEA) and the ESHRE Certification for Reproductive Endoscopic Surgery (ECRES) provides a structured learning path, recognising different pillars of competence. In order to achieve a high level of competence a two steps validation is necessary: (a) the individual should be certified of having the appropriate theoretical knowledge and (b) the endoscopic psychomotor skills before entering in the diploma programme reflecting the surgical competence. The influence of such an educational and credentialing path could improve safety and offer financial benefits to the hospitals, physicians and healthcare authorities. Moreover the medicolegal consequences can be important when a significant amount of surgeons possess the different diplomas. As the programs are becoming universally accessible, recognised as the best scientific standard, included in the continuous medical education (CME) and continuous professional development (CPD), it is expected that a significant number of surgeons will soon accomplish the diploma path. The co-existence and practice of both non-certified and certified surgeons with different degrees of experience is unavoidable. However, it is expected that national health systems (NHS), hospitals and insurance companies will demand and hire doctors with high and specific proficiency to endoscopic surgery. When medico-legal cases are under investigation, the experts should be aware of the limitations that individual experience provides. The court first of all examines and then judges if there is negligence and decides accordingly. However, lack of certification may be considered as negligence by a surgeon operating a case that eventual faces litigation problems. Patients' safety and objective preoperative counselling are mandatory, directly connected to MIS certification while eliminating any dispute of surgeons' credibility.

摘要

引入微创外科(MIS)认证/文凭项目有望提高手术操作水平、患者安全性及治疗效果。妇科内镜手术教育与评估项目(GESEA)和生殖内镜手术ESHRE认证(ECRES)提供了一条结构化的学习路径,认可不同的能力支柱。为达到高水平的能力,需要进行两步验证:(a)个人应获得拥有适当理论知识的认证,以及(b)在进入反映手术能力的文凭项目之前具备内镜操作心理运动技能。这样一条教育和认证路径的影响能够提高安全性,并为医院、医生和医疗保健当局带来经济利益。此外,当大量外科医生拥有不同文凭时,法医学后果可能很重要。随着这些项目变得普遍可及、被认可为最佳科学标准并纳入继续医学教育(CME)和持续专业发展(CPD),预计大量外科医生将很快完成文凭课程。经验程度不同的未认证和认证外科医生的共存与执业是不可避免的。然而,预计国家卫生系统(NHS)、医院和保险公司将要求并聘用具有高度和特定内镜手术熟练程度的医生。当法医学案件在调查中时,专家应意识到个人经验所带来的局限性。法院首先进行审查,然后判断是否存在过失并据此做出裁决。然而,对于最终面临诉讼问题的手术病例,缺乏认证可能被视为外科医生的过失。患者安全和客观的术前咨询是强制性的,与MIS认证直接相关,同时消除对外科医生可信度的任何争议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验